HassenderZerhacker

you definitely need to read my other posts! lol!

I'd have to answer: "Wargaming"

there is logic behind this though. then they can ask other questions to people who like the game, and then claim 70% approval by player survey. seems they follow the advice to only trust statistics that they themselves made up. even in Belarus, they gradually reduced approval levels. 95.8% from before was too obviously fake. Now they are at 70% and still call it "overwhelmingly positive".

angry of seeing your free content (aka. F2P players) leave the game?

maybe a future gameplay feature, possibly released together with homing bombs.

"trust" is a positive word, so if I'd trust them, it would be because I think they are focused on giving me the best gaming experience. evaluated on this scale, the result is a score of zero. then "trust" can be interpreted as predictability - then the score is 11 - I trust Wargaming to always follow their self-interest of making more money above all.

it was entirely previsible that the would has become a pile of steaming nonsensical poop. just stay away and don't allow yourself to be used by WG as free content for their premium shoot them up game.

you should be thankful!

I have been dodging the battle button too. WG is right, dodging works 100%

stopped playing. 'nuff said

whatever - the single fact alone that in a mode called "Frontline" defenders are not supposed to camp is nonsense. in the first edition of Frontline, there were much less of such consumables and no wheelies and cover. I have absolutely no interest in "fast paced", "dynamic" battles that resemble counterstrike more than a tactical game.

actually, WG has planes in WoT in the form of consumables in "Frontlines" battle mode. that's BTW, in part what killed that game mode for me. the initial Frontlines was fun, there was cover, bushes, etc. and the battle was pretty tactical. Then they introduced wheeled vehicles and multiplied dumb consumables like air strike, artillery strike, etc. and deleted cover and bushes from the maps. anyway, WoT seems to be going down the drain the same as WoWS, since there are news of WoT introducing "crew 2.0" which is a pure pay to win scam.

I'm glad I'm not there to see this

WG wants you to press "battle". just don't give them that satisfaction!

OP totally has a point, that's also how WoWS gameplay looks (looked) to me. The exception is when playing top tier BB in a relatively DD and CV safe MM, or DD when there are no CV and not too much opposing DD. And if you observe the better players, they are often what remains at the end of a battle because they have been hiding behind islands for the most part of the battle.

yes, think this will happen. WG is making all its games more and more toxic. WoWs has already become unplayable, and WoT is not far from the same state. Everything WG has touched in the past few years, since approx. 2017, has turned into poop because they peddle their ever more powerful premiums and want to cater to players who want faster-paced games, or at least, that's what WG imagines. I think we will never see great games like WoT 2017 and WoWs 2019 again.

I see why you are having a difficult time. You should have read the principat121's release notes. Humor is not implemented in principat121.

maybe for the better...

now you just have to devise a way to make it pay to win, and maybe WG will do it

the article is completely unclear, all I can remember from it is "money laundering involving Wargaming LLC"

more cannonfodder

they probably mean the animals in a stable

I won't even see how they will turn out.

just leave this game, you will feel much better and have more time for things that are more meaningful and maybe even actually fun. I feel much better.

just stop to play this FUBAR game, problem solved. WG wants to increase RNG and random frustrations so it can monetize better. It's less obvious in WoT, but in WoWS, oh my Buddha. Just say no.