HassenderZerhacker

carriers should have some air superiority planes they could send to provide air cover by escorting ships, attacking enemy planes or patrolling a map area for some time.

the fighter wings should be deployable at the same time as attack wings and have some useful duration, for example 3 minutes on mission.

they need to rework the voice, there are some funny things but just mistaking one ship for another isn't that funny and gets old really quick. put more funny stuff in.

price structure adapted to Russian spenders. reminds me of a joke about "new Russians" back in the 90ies A New Russian brags to his colleague: "Look at my new tie. I bought it for 500 dollars in the store over there." "You were conned. You could have paid twice as much for the same one just across the street!"

hefty grinds? no thanks as well...

ah, christmas missions from the premium shop... ok, no thanks

When I play Kongo or König against other battleships, König or New Mexico or whatever - they hit me at range (14 - 16Km) with AP and quite often do heavy damage 4000-8000 damage, even against my angled armor, but when I shoot them I seem to only do 2000 damage every time, even my salvo hits, but I get many over-pens and ricochets. So why do they do more damage to me than me to them ? We both shoot AP and my salvos hit. This happened many times already, I feel discouraged and don't understand why I don't do at least equal damage. Also, aren't German battleships supposed to be well-armored?

I saw those Gorizia missions, but the first one says I need a "Gorizia" ship, I don't have one ??

I think I know... I was battling New York, it has 89mm deck armor (the only tier 5 ship with such armor)

yes, I knew this everything already, but I want an answer to the question, why I do little damage while I get hit for big damage doing practically the same thing as the enemy.

let me take it back on tier 5 - it doesn't hit anything either.

I got as far as the tier 5 one... still didn't upgrade it fully, but it's way better than the tier 4 one. tier 3 is said in the forum to be good, but I couldn't do anything with it, when there are no carriers it's difficult to do any damage because you can't hit anything, and when there are carriers, you are just carrier food, impossible to do anything. enjoyment: below zero tier 4 is the same as tier 3. enjoyment: below zero tier 5 actually hits the target sometimes. enjoyment: average

I got a big popup saying I should collect Santa's gifts or something, then I click and there's nothing to collect? Is there something or... ? it's rather confusing.

thanks! I don't remember a container ship, but now I look for one ;-)

seems there is nothing worthwhile in these containers. I also got 3 black friday containers, 1 2018 and 2 2019, and the contents have been underwhelming. I won't bother anymore with doing missions for containers. Even when I select "more credits" I only get 50.000 credits. Do normal containers have any chance of dropping ships?

worse than playing tier 3 vs. 3 CV ?

There is something I don't understand. Many guns have the same caliber, but damage varies WILDLY. from 1500 to 10000 for 150 - 152 mm guns for example. It doesn't make any sense ? Is that just done for tier "balance", i.e. a tier 8 does huge damage with its 150mm guns while a tier 3 using the same caliber can't really shoot back? what is this nonsense?

yeah, ok, I got a bit carried away there! I just noticed I read some figures wrong, lol.

err... no... every time I told my opinion about fighting with tier 3 ships against CV I got a chatban

I think instead of wargaming censoring chat and distributing chatbans, the easiest solution for them should be to turn off chat for people who complain. problem solved.

triple carrier games...

try 3 CV. when playing tier 3 without AA, I relatively often get into battles with 3 CV.

err, no. there might differences in sales tax (about 5 to 15%), but currencies have nothing to do with it. selling at differences prices is not really a problem, the problem lies in preventing informed customers from other countries to buy at the lower prices. there are similar scams going on for airplane tickets. in Switzerland, there is also a scam regarding household appliances such as washing machines, which are often 50% more expensive in Switzerland than 5Km away in Germany. selling digital goods at different prices depending on the buyer's IP address is simply a scam. the "intrinsic value" thing can be discussed - even many physical goods have very low intrinsic value but are sold for big $$$. here I think about value given by the brand for example. so you think selling digital goods at different prices based on the buyer's IP address is ok. did you ever think about who buys digital goods in India? I live in Thailand. here I see the people who buy digital goods, for example world of tanks premium tanks. most buyers have dozens of premium tanks. and they have good computers to play the game. who do you think they are? farm laborers earning 260 baht /day? or rather members of well-off families owning several cars, several houses with maids? these people's disposable income's buying power is far superior to that of most of the EU's impoverished youth.

I'm with the OP. Regional pricing is just evil. A product's price should be function of production cost and scarcity + a profit margin, not based on what people can pay. The latter is just horrible, it means it's ok for people to get ripped off because they are rich. In the best case it comes down to high price buyers subsidizing the others, which is just wrong on so many levels too.

it's the same in WoT. there will be some tanks that seemingly can't win on some days.