Skyllon

In the light of the past, I'd call 'really, really low expectations' being very, very optimistic.

Don't give them ridiculous ideas. I'm sure they still have plenty of those. Let them fix MM first and then maybe +-2 would become playable on T6 and T8.

Hard to say. I have easily >20 of those upgrades gathering dust. If anything WG should've removed them for the sake of balance, but since balance is long gone, probably it wouldn't make much difference anyway.

Not going to happen. Superupgrades are meant to be rare. And since one can get them not only from Supercontainers, exchange would mean almost free access to any upgrade that you want in large numbers.

Me likey mah sushi. But more then sushi me likey ''BulletProof'' Tone(y)

Nothing's changed in detonations mechanics to my knowledge. Detonations are as s***y as always have been. I'm honestly surprised though, forum hasn't got flooded with 'detonating' topics after introduction of RN HE Spammers...

It is not possible to mount camouflage on rentals. No tab in 'exterior' section. Not sure if I missed something or it is design feature...

As predecessor pointed out it is paper design with sole purpose of filling T9. You also need to take into accout the fact, game is constant 'work in progress' (with new lines coming out every couple of months along game mechanic and balancing changes), so ships that were introduced at one point into the game, might not be best fitting years later.

1. Conqueror APHE, AP, Heal, Concealment, Maneuverability and since MT had been called out, I'm not going to mention excellent AA.

Don't even start. No translators exist, that could possibly handle explanation...

Let's change this thread into "Post your highest count of shot down planes without getting clear sky" table score.

Missions like that are actually nice addition. They make randoms unique and I like diversity. Don't have the problem with weekends every now and then dominated by the ships of certain nation. Makes for interesting gameplay opportunities for all other lines.

I've seen Zao's using torps from second line on targets 10km away going in... ...opposite direction. Even engaging in discussions that 'they might have longer range'... Friant. You can expect it on such a low tier. Kind of. But at higher ones there are no excuses. Good and mendatory introductory set of missions would help I think. It is great we have such a tutorial in game. Oh wait...

Get used to it. It's going to be a while before WG decides to do something about that. Last night had a doubtful pleasure of sailing in KM Crispmark under fire from ConquError, spamming HE from 19 km...

Happens to me too couple of times during gaming session. Courtesy of recent updates...

Nope. Since joke hidden in prefix would then have no sense. Anyhoo. It is my CV, so... But feel free to name yours the way you find most fitting.

I sense the winds of enviousness cavorting in someone's sails... ...but joke aside, some people indeed might feel cheated. As time goes by, I'm more and more inclined to think those are not mistakes on WG part, because I refuse to believe in such incompetence.

Well, since Ranger + Ryujo = 106 planes, then I guess enemy battleships and cruisers launched more then 30 aircrafts. Or you shot down some of them while they were not set as priority AA targets.

USS Exocet (CVF-81) Now. Where is my reward?

It has nothing to do with the Haloween. Rostral Column is just a hidden "Marker". It simply is Dead Space infestation.

I'm all in. Just make CVs more present and nerf its AA to Ishi levels. All you said is more less true, but it doesn't change the fact when you balance ship, you don't give it 5/5 in all categories and I'm pretty sure even if ConqError's AA survivibility is so low, it is not by design but by the (conq)error.

Going to disagree with you. It has by far best midrange AA of all ships. 526dpm / 3.5 km. Monty has 317 / 3.5, Yama 280/3.1, GrossWurst 195/5. And yes, while you lose a lot of it due to enemy fire, thanks to its concealment you can easily drop under the radar, so you won't be perma spotted. And I imagine enemy CV would pick easier targets or less nimble bbs.

Taking into account number of battles played by you, 375k should be rather dispensable amount. Spend it on what you think will give you more fun - Nelson / Yamato. Izumo is not that much fun to play, true, but if I were to spend free XP on it, I'd only upgrade its hull and save the rest of XP. I don't care about getting to OP ships before they get nerfed, I prefer to play those I like not those that are OP. But even if ConqError is your 'holy grail', I'd not skip any of the previous ships since they are OP anyway and easy to grind through. There also will be next Free XP Premiums (probably?) and might turn out won't be as cheap as Nelson, so you might regret spending it on something like skipping ships / boosting advance. (Also with new flags on premium account you can do 15-20k each battle easy). Although I might not be the best to ask. I spent 800k free XP on cap. training (yes training, not retraining). But heaving over 1.3 mil of it and nothing painful to grind, didn't seem to me as much of a problem.

Yeah, but if you take into account its ridiculous heal - which also makes its survivability much better - it suddenly doesn't have such a low HP pool. Because we all know 0 - 30k HP in 20s is... ...Balanced R.

Dang... So late again to such a cunstructive thread... ConqError has short fuse AP, best HE, best heal, best concealment, best maneuverability, second best turning radius, virtually no citadell, excellent AA, which are all balanced by worse dispersion and shitty torpedo protection. Yap. Balanced R. Edit: Oh, oh, and I forgot to add entire concept this line have been designed around is not only flawed but also goes against game core ideas.