Admiral_H_Nelson

You've got to remember that Communications are not Wargaming's strong point (Along with balancing) The worked example is very poor IMHO. Don't forget that in the original version they used Ryujo, not Zuiho! How I read it is this. You have Hosho and are grinding Zuiho. You have 5,000 ship XP on Zuiho. Zuiho is removed and the 5000 ship XP gets credited to Hosho PLUS you get 9,300 Free XP as a bonus. The XP used on researched modules on Zuiho is credited to you as Free XP. The cost of any purchased modules is credited to you in full. Oustanding questions: 1) Do you get the cost of buying the Zuiho credited back to you? 2) What happens to any upgrades fitted to Zuiho? Are they dismounted for free and placed in the Inventory?

As posted in the other thread on Black Friday deals (before I saw this one). The 2500 doubloons offer is horse excrement. If they are offering compensation to people who buy Atago B and already own the regular Atago, then they should just give the owners 2500 doubloons straight up AND NOT MAKE THEM PLAY 10 GAMES. It almost looks like another Wargaming plan to make people play more

The 2500 doubloons offer is horse excrement. If they are offering compensation to people who buy Atago B and already own the regular Atago, then they should just give the owners 2500 doubloons straight up AND NOT MAKE THEM PLAY 10 GAMES. It almost looks like another Wargaming plan to make people play more

Why have Wargaming removed the carriers? There is no actual need yet. Is it a long-term move because they don't think that the rework carriers will fit in operations? Or is it a subtle way of making operations harder, and using the CV rework as an excuse (he said, cynically).?

matchmaking has gotten WORSE if anything. Tried 5 Tier 8 ships. Bottom tier in all games. In three of them the majority of ships were tier X. Wargaming. Marks out of 10 for effort = 10 marks out of 10 for effectiveness = 0

Too get the full SJW effect you have to call it "Waycist".

+1

And YOU have the hypocrisy to accuse ME of personal attacks. I've had many dealings with you on the forum and the overall taste is bad I'm afraid. Can we make a pact, please? I will refrain from commenting on your posts, and in return you will refrain from commenting on mine? Thank You in advance.

The ones that I know of in the last six months (June-November 2018) = 12 Vanguard Dreadnought Jean Bart Le Terrible Stalingrad T-61 Cossack Nuevo de Julio Boise Haida Salem Massachusetts In the previous six months (December 2017 to May 2018) = 13 Monaghan Kronshtadt Z-39 Duca degli Abruzzi Asashio Varyag Gascogne Aigle Roma Musashi Ashitaka Duke of York Vampire

Rather too frequently in Wargaming's case. I can also refer you to the case of the Aigle - which was sold with a known bug WHICH WAS NOT COMMUNICATED. But what's the point @ColonelPete? You are notorious for defending Wargaming whatever they do. If they demolished your house "by mistake" you would probably still defend them!

BUT NOT BEFORE RELEASING IT! You are supposed to catch errors before you release then to the public. Don't forget, either, the Vanguard thread to which you have contributed. Also a foul-up. They make rather too many to be considered a quality software outfit. Or maybe it's just that my standards are too high - or yours are too low.

Dude - you are way, WAY too trusting about Wargaming's competence. These guys just released a premium ship without noticing that its camo was not being rendered in Port! This is the mindset of a software company that makes changes without checking or announcing them. I've (sadly) worked in such organizations.

"World of Farming" will feature a Tractor Line from France, Germany, Italy, China, USA, Britain ......and 34 from Russia.

Well, technically it is more true to say "would have had", rather than "had".

This appears to be a very good move from Wargaming, so I offer a well deserved salute. The only fly in the ointment is the introduction of the "Thunderstorm Front". I hate these bad weather effects. "Battles featuring the Thunderstorm Front will only be available for ships of Tier VIII, IX and X." Note: I fully accept that I am in the minority here. As the Patch Notes say: "In Operation Hermes, we tested the Thunderstorm Front, a new mechanic that affects events happening within a particular region of the map. The mechanics received a warm welcome from players..."

Great point! I've often wrestled with this question and tried to make sense of it.

Everyone knows that the real Dunkirk operation was carried out by Glorious Soviet Navy, who rescued Capitalists. Leader of Soviet Squadron was famous Russian Admiral Sergei Dunkirkovitch!

"Hen's Teeth" and "Rocking Horse Droppings".

In my last match I dodged a salvo from a Yamato. As the post match report says, none of them hit. Yet the salvo sunk me. I'm not clever enough to understand what went on here. Can any technical whizz explain please? A couple of screenshots to illustrate what I mean.

A few days ago I checked my stats on a well-known website. It shows graphs for several categories - Win Rate, Average Damage, Average Experience and Personal Rating. Since I had not played Random battles from late August to the present day the graphs for the first three categories was flat, but the graph for PR showed an improvement! Graphs Could this be because better players are not playing so much (or leaving) and worse players are playing more (or joining)?

Yeah - noticed something similar...and I'm just a potato. So I'm dying to know what this is. Is it a) A Communications F-up. or b) A Developer F-up.

Sadly no - you don't get them for PvE.

Thanks...but No Thanks. A hearty "Well Done" to all at Wargaming who participated in creating a very good event for Halloween. The designs of the ships was great and in keeping with the Halloween theme. The technical & gameplay challenges were overcome really well to create an experience of submarines, while staying within the overall "Kill Rasputin & the Bad Guys" story. IMHO the best Easter/Halloween novelty event ever, except maybe the Captain's bath Tub. However, I am bored to death with subs by now. I can't see how they can be bought into the main game ( in anything like their current form) without getting stale very quickly.

Many Thanks for all the replies. A near miss causing damage is actually realistic, (Seems a bit extreme to actually sink the ship with one though) I'll add this to the list of frustrations of the game. I'm now up to 1,988,378,341,904,259,337,340,217.

Best point made in the entire thread, IMHO!