Eldarad

I'm not suggesting it's deceptive or even deliberate on the part of Wargaming. I completely understand and am comfortable with the fact that in a free-to-play game the developer has to give players the opportunity to spend real money in order to finance the game's development. But it does look like the text from a different screen has been copy and pasted without considering whether it is clear and appropriate for signals. I also notice from the replies to this thread that the explanations as to how it's not confusing rely on you already knowing the situation regarding the purchase of signals, which rather confirms that it is not intuitive for people who are relying on the tooltip to actually explain what the tickbox does.

I find the new(ish) auto-resupply option for signals confusing - and I think it's because of the wording. I want the game to behave such that it will resupply signals I have in stock, but not to buy signals with doubloons. And I'm never sure if that's actually how the game will behave. I think using the words "in-game currency" isn't helpful as credits and doubloons are both in-game currency, but I want the game to treat them differently since one is mostly obtained with real life money and the other isn't. I get the feeling the devs are aware of this distinction, but somewhere along the line the wording that was used has gotten confused. There's such a lot of potential to upset players by having them inadvertantly spend real money on a signal - hopefully the wording can be clarified for the next update?