Zemeritt

Geburtstagssammelung:

Wird hier wieder der Tod von etwas hinaufbeschworen, bevor es überhaupt irgendwas festes gibt? Seht es so: Sollte der Rework all die "alten" CV-Hasen vertreiben, die Anzahl der CV-Spieler aber verdoppeln, da die Steuerung jetzt "Bob"gerechter ist, ist das aus WGs Sicht garantiert ein Erfolg.

Jup und dann wundert sich WG über die geringe Anzahl der Kreuzer im MM.

Ich mach mir halt nur Sorgen wegen der Kreuzer, da diese auch massiv unter dem IFHE Dakka-Dakka leiden. Und gerade Kreuzer "sollten" der Counter zu DDs sein.

Bei dem sperrt sich doch eh alles sobald er ein TX in der Teamaufstellung sieht. Jetzt wissen wir aber immerhin, was für ein "Teamplayer" RB in Wirklichkeit ist.

Genau, wie die Zeppelin

Nur wirst du bedeutend einfacher einen Panzerprototypen bauen können als einen Schiffsprototypen.

Nur wenn der Gegner nicht genug anwinkelt

Laut @Crysantos im englischen Forum hat jemand bei der Big E den Schalter für die Tarnung zu früh umgelegt, sie sollte eigentlich noch nicht verfügbar sein.

Mit HE kommst du aber ohne IFHE eben nicht durch 25mm durch.

Wenn der Feind angewinkelt ist, bekommst du aber Probleme.

Dir ist aber hoffentlich klar, das man keine Schiffe "einfach mal so" bauen kann wie Panzer? Der Anteil von Planschiffen wird immer recht groß bleiben in diesem Spiel, sobald die größeren Marinen im Spiel sind.

That and the fact that a BB just has to change it's course in order to all torpedos to miss. Then you have to wait for the reload again. Gun boats can put consistent pressure on a BB, if it stays in your area. Pretty much, but WG doesn't care. Cruisers could slot hydro after all I believe they need to rework the AP and HE mechanics, if they want to change stuff. Often it'd be smarter to sail on broadside as a cruiser to let BB-AP overpen instead of trying to evade, which gives the AP enough armour to arm and cripple the ship.

Tja, schätze das hat WG davon, die Meinungen der Spieler zu ignorieren. Dafür ist vielen Spielern ihre Zeit zu schade.

And yet I see cruisers and DDs die to torpedos way more often the any BB. Still I would say torpedos are a rather ineffective anti BB weapon. DWT as they're on Pan-DDs were a mistake. Cruisers should be able to spot them like normal torpedos while BB can't. Yes, but overbuffing them won't solve the problem either.

Torpedos are way more effective against other DDs and Cruisers. BBs, who actually use WASD, usually just take one or two, which, thanks to their HP-Pool is not as bad as DDs, who tend to die instatly or cruisers, who easily can lose half their HP if they're cought in a wrong turn. Well, it's a selfmade problem by WG: By introducing weapons to fight the large BB numbers, they create weapons capable of killing cruisers even faster. (DWT-Torpedos as an example) They're also not "UP" per se, just in a really bad spot at the moment. The question is rather: Isn't it stupid that ships have to take this skill to make damage in the first place? Before IFHE, CLs (Those which were there) depended alot on fire damage, while CAs could do more raw HE damage. Which IFHE the CLs are better at that then CAs. If you Buff the cruiser to deal better with BBs, you will make them even more lethal against eachother. I remember those days in which cruiser could rush a BB headon and torp him to death since the BB couldn't overmatch the bow. Also not Buff cruisers, rather nerf the BBs. While it's true that a cruiser should be better at chasing DDs, I belive the raw stone-> scissors -> paper system has been gone from quite a while now. The BB-AP Bug seems to be a core problem in the AP mechanic itself. They really seem to have big troubles solving that bug. That the AP-Bombs are a st*pid mechanic was pretty obvious from the beginning, the fact that they're more effective against cruisers instead of the main target BB just shows how little WG cares about cruisers. You could citadel BBs, if their citadell wouldn't be a submarine. But since WG has to kiss up with all the poor BB players complaning about getting citadelled to oblivion and therefor camp, the lowered the cits below water. Didn't change anything tho: Those crybabies still camp as hard as ever. You forgot the AP bug, which caused alot of BBs to take citadels again. WG fixed that within days Well, it's russian, what else did you expect from WG? While the BBs laughs at you while healing all that fire "damage" you caused to it? ^^This! The Harugumo is only effective if you let her be effective.

With HE, this certainly is the case. And honestly I don't really see a solution to this.

I won't deny that cruisers are in a bad spot (especially those in the T5-8 bracket), but that is another problem and not really related to this HE and IFHE problem.

Schätze bei den beiden ist es beabsichtig, da das Katapult zwischen den Türmen liegt und somit das Flugzeug "im Weg" stehen würde.

Honestly, that's the least of my concern. Since I play her alot recently, I feel really sorry for the cruisers, who get in my way. The BBs take some time to "melt" away, but the cruisers suffer the most from this. The only HT BB who really suffer are those completly plated in 32mm (Conq and Repu).

Heute @Micander in der Buffalo im Team gehabt auf Hot Spot. Leider wurde er zum Ende von der Misssouri breitseitig erwischt. Etwas später hatte ich dann @Igarigen "im Match". Leider war sein PC abgeschmiert und er wurde von einer Des Moines abgefarmt, bevor er wieder zurück kam.

With 1/5 the ships would still be able to duel with 25mm plated cruisers, since with IFHE the pen goes up to 25mm The problem is: How else you want to the ship work in the current game? With the old 1/6 the need to have IFHE to even pen DDs with HE. As stated above, a 1/5 pen wouldn't save the 25mm cruisers. The Harugumo basicly only has her guns to work with. ( And 12 torpedos all ~3 mins) Otherwise she has enough drawback that balance her. That she overperforms currently is still because she is rather new and the playerbase adapts rather slow.

I'm at 194 atm. If i could keep my mouth shut more often, I properly would have more.

What a bad poll. I'm not fine with the state of the CV at the moment, but I also don't want them to be removed. How else should I feast of all those CV players tears who come to close to my AA-specced cruisers?

Without IFHE the 100mm guns of the IJN can not pen 25mm of T8+ cruisers.