Turbeen

Does anybody know when USS Missouri is coming to WoWS ? ... see wiki. I have Steven Seagal captain in my port waiting for Missouri, so any information about her potential release date - thx in advance ! (.. hopefully, if Missouri is premium ship, it won´t cost 150 USD, but some reasonable money .. sorry, but 150 USD price tag would be the very bad joke .. )

1) Tier VII je zlo? No to snad ne ... Ale jako vždy:někdo rád vdolky, jiný zase holky ... 2) Více informací o spoluhráčích na začátku bitvy v hodnocených bitvách ... bych si nepřál proto, aby se spoluhráči hádali, ale aby se komunikace na začátku bitvy co nejvíce urychlila a zjednodušila. Neměl bych totiž vůbec problém rychleji respektovat přání (.. např. pojďme obsadit A, atd. .. ) hráčů vyššího ranku než mám sám - dokázali více než já a jde jim o víc než mě. Docela mě frustruje sledovat rady v chatu od spoluhráče v průběhu bitvy, které se mi nelíbí, abych po prohrané bitvě zjistil, že daný "rádce" je o 4 ranky níže než já. Netvrdím, že hráč vyššího ranku je vždy chytřejší a mnohem zkušenější, ale vědět dopředu "who is who" by přece nebylo na škodu. Do Superligy jsem to bohužel ještě nedotáhl, v této sezóně jsem se dostal jen na rank 5 a výsledně skončil na 7. Ale mohu potvrdit: to, co jsem zažil na ranku 5 bylo zcela jiné kafe než na předchozích úrovních - konkrétně: jak se spoluhráči s DDs starali o nás, co jsme měli větší lodě a neustále nás kryli kouřem, to byla naprostá paráda oproti předchozím úrovním. Takže Superliga musí být naprosto fantastická ... a vlastně: nebyl by nějaký replay ze Superligy na youtube ? Už jdu hledat .. snad se zlepším do příští sezóny natolik, abych se "prokousal" - a to zaslouženě - ještě výš. A všem přeji to samé !

Sorry WG, but your pink colour mechanics for "team killer" doesnt work properly ... If I launch my torps towards the opponent, and after several long seconds some teammate goes directly to the trajectory "me - opponent" = directly to journey of my torps (and dies surprisingly, and starts to insult me verbally in chat), even if he had a lot of other safe directions and had enough time to see me not only on minimap, but directly on the battlescreen ... and thanks to such irracional behaviour of my blind, or selfish, or lazy, or unexperienced teammate it is me who is marked as "team killer" with pink colour ... Sorry WG, your "pink mechanics" work incorrectly just now! Can you do anything about it asap ? Why? Because from now ... I´m not considering (.. and may be I´m not alone ..) "pink" players as bad / dangerous / un-fair players. Pink colour - in many cases - means also ... some player played correctly, but his teammate ignored him completely !! WG, thx in advance for your help !

Omg ... another man lazy to read previous posts. Sorry, but ... in the future I won´t reply to anybody who is lazy to gain information before writing useless post.

Useless post. I explained my lesson learned earlier in one of my previous posts - link. (You were lazy to read and you were rude to me ... what about to send me some dublons as apology, man ?)

Once more ... My teammate had been in the safe position, I launched my torps, my teammate changed direction by cca 90 degrees, and sailed directly to trajectory "me - opponent". He was stopped by rock, and after that was hit by my torp. And my teammate had to see me long time ago, and should know that also my ship could launch torps.

Zathras_Grimm, Thx for your post. My teammate has done 90 degrees turn after I have already launched my torps. And sailed to & was stopped by rock, and only after that was hit by my torp. You know, second line torping - pink colour is ok, but triangle torping (explained above) - I don´t agree with pink colour ... especially if the player launched torps in the heat of the battle before the teammate did bad turn.

Nonsense. ... You are playing only ships without torps, or you havent played enough battles so far. Nonsense. ... In the moment of launching my torps, my teammate was in the safe position. Wrong assumption again. My teammate was a little bit closer to enemy than me, and he had enough speed to go to totally wrong position (between me and our opponent).

So guys, we have: - second line torping ... there is the teammate between player who launches torps and the opponent in the moment when the player launches torps - triangle torping ... player who launches torps, teammate, and opponent form the triangle in the moment when the player launches torps In the first case - launching torps is totally bad act, no question or discussion about it. In the second case - depends on situation: if you are DD+CA against the opponent .. DD wil want to launch torps anyway, CA should be careful, ... if you are 2 DDs against the opponent ... who knows ... .

If the exactly same situation happens again ... no, no torps from my side. As I said in one of my previous posts: based on my experience / on that incident - for me it is better not to help intensively (via shooting AND torps) in the future, because I don´t know how skillfull, experienced, etc. my teammate is. So sorry, I will use only shooting in similar sitaution in the future, and if my teammate is being killed by the opponent - sorry, I had to consider potential "team kill".

Who am I ? May be .. partaker and witness of the incident ?? Exactly the place they wanted to go ... directly to the rocks and to be stop by them? ... Do you want to be stopped when enemy ship with torps is close to you ? I don´t think so ...

Wrong assumption. I had CA, my teammate had much faster DD. So no teleporting ... no mystery.

Read previous comments, pls ... we are not discussing 2nd line torps at all.

Hi stewie, You are 100% right, if we are talking about second line torping. But ... My situation was not like this: me, my teammate, and opponent - we were in the triangle position when I launched torps, so I was not launching my torps from second line at all. I wanted to help my teammate with all means ... so also with my torps. Me and my teammate .. we both launched our torps towards the opponent. I followed to safe direction / avoiding my teammates´ torps, but my teammate ... So, what would you expect from your teammate ... to go directly between me and my opponent ? Even if he could go to any other direction ? Even if he could know that my ship had also torps ?

Once more, moomoo .. if you cant get it: " If I launch my torps towards the opponent, and after several long seconds some teammate goes directly to the trajectory "me - opponent" = directly to journey of my torps (and dies surprisingly, and starts to insult me verbally in chat), even if he had a lot of other safe directions and had enough time to see me not only on minimap, but directly on the battlescreen ... "

Thx guys ... no problem for me anymore. Nice advice "Do not count on intelligence of your allies, ever" will come to my mind next time. I will remain black, and my teammate will be dead - not by me, but by opponent.

Thx for the advice. Next time ... I will let my teammate die ... safer for me. No teamplay anymore.

You havent got my point. Finished.

What a heresy ?? In Europe ... if we are talking about WW2 ships ... pink colour is only for small girls, or extravagant women ... otouto !!

Mám 2 prosby už k další sezóně hodnocených bitev: 1) Uvítal bych, kdyby se do hodnocených bitev dostaly i lodě tieru VII. V této sezóně to byly lodě tierů VI. a VIII. Nicméně, mě vyhovovaly i lodě tieru VII. ... Ano, někdo se mnou nebude souhlasit a bude tvrdit, že hodnocené bitvy by se měly odehrávat na co nejvyšších tierech. Sorry - s tímhle nesouhlasím. 2) Na začátku bitvy bych uvítal více informací o spoluhráčích ve vlastním týmu. Např. na jakém jsou aktuálně ranku a jak jsou (doposud) úspěšní v hodnocených bitvách - přes všechny sezóny a typy lodí (DD, CA, BB,..), v aktuální sezóně a přes všechny typy lodí, v aktuální sezóně s daným typem lodě. Díky předem!

Just some minutes ago ... I have finished my last ARP mission ... ARP Nachi. Last days I had bigger luck ( .. or enough skill ? ) to sunk U.S.S.R opponents, and now I´m glad that the mission for Nachi is over ... purely because the Russian / U.S.S.R ships are not played so often as ships of other nations. I wish good progress and happy finish with this mission to all of you, guys. Nachi is another Myoko clone, but ... light green is much, much better than pink !!

Small update about progress ... IJN - 20/20, US - 20/20, USSR - 8/20 (.. yeah, finally I made some steps towards the quota "20", but still ... there are not many USSR ships in battles ... ), and DKM - 20/20. Other ARP mssions already done (.. Takao looks quite nice actually ..), so .. only ARP Nachi remains to be accomplished. Goodluck to all of you with your missions! Turbeen

Just now ... IJN - 20/20 US - 17/20 USSR - 1/20 (! ... yeah, only one USSR ship eliminated so far ... !) DKM - 16/20 ... so ... it is all about USSR ships. If there are not any USSR ships in opponents´ team ... how to reach the quota "20" ?

Exactly. ... And for me .. condition "destroy 20 U.S.S.R ships" is pure frustration. ... But ok, life is hard sometimes, so if I won´t get ARP Nachi ... who cares.

Grand Fleet of Fog - ARP Nachi ... To destroy 20 IJN, U.S., and German ships with ship tier VIII+ till 1st Jan 2017 should not be a serious issue, but to destroy 20 U.S.S.R ships ... could be a serious issue. I´m playing tier VIII nowadays, and it is very hard to get even one U.S.S.R ship in enemy team ... and what about to kill her, it is another question completely. Would it be useful to change this particular condition, e.g. instead of 20 U.S.S.R ships ... to destroy 20 U.S.S.R OR 20 U.K. ships ? Or to exclude U.S.S.R ships from conditions completely ?? I think that I would not be the only player who has the issue to destroy U.S.S.R ships to get ARP Nachi ... Thx in advance for any adjustment asap ! ( ... no, I´m not complaining, but ... thx for understanding ! ...)