Sauron1978

eben. ich bin sehr zufrieden mit der Enterprise, obwohl CVs eigentlich nicht meine Klasse ist. wenn WG sie verkaufen will, muss sie sich angleichen, oder ein Gimik haben, was sie interessant macht. ansonsten wird sie im Shop verrotten.

naja, wenn sie die Richtung vorgeben, dann müßte die GZ auch stark werden - denn die anderen sind es

eher ein Blutdiamant könnte sein

sehe ich Beides als zu schwach an - ergo bleibt der Geldhahn zu bei so einer Aufteilung.

meinst Du solche: hatte mein Clankollege vorhin im Team - mit der Tirpitz. sorry, 1,3k Gefechte und sooo schei.e?? hat doch nix mehr mit Spaß zu tun bei dem

da hast Du etwas falsch verstanden - sie wird gerade ohne Torps getestet, nur mit Bomberstaffeln.

will trotzdem kein 2-0-3

dann zeig doch mal Deine Stats - scheinst ja besser zu sein, als sein 58% WR

maaaan, was heute wieder für Fallobst herum fährt, ist nur noch grauenhaft - kein Bock mehr. dann noch ne Deto in der Zao bei Spielbeginn - läuft würde ich sagen Spiel schließen und fertig für heute!

na, da schauen wir uns mal die Antwort von WG an, wonach sie balancen: Q: Greetings spotter, who do the developers believe are better suited to balance the game; a good player who uses an objective approach or a highly subjective average/bad player? Following this, how do the developers believe they really can balance carriers, because it's been two years since the game has released and from the perspective of a decent carrier player, the patches towards carriers has been horrible, and not to be rude but from the public stats of the developers, nearly none of them play high tier carriers. A: Hi. Overall, ships should be balanced based on those players who are most frequent in randoms – sad but true. However, taking skill into consideration is a must, that’s why we have tools for that. However, the majority of playerbase is primary, we cannot balance the game around 10% of audience. As for playing CVs, well, I am definitely not good at it for now, but those developers who play CVs and do Game Design, are quite good at it. No offence too, but our goal is to create a good game, not to be top players and play all day long instead of working. You don’t expect a piano creator to be the best piano player, right? WG geht nach dem Durchschnittsspieler - nicht nach Euch Einhörnern. seitdem ich das gestern im anderen Thread gepostet habe, kam von Ama gar nichts mehr - warum wohl?

als ob die Abstimmung hier WG interessieren würde aber ja, ohne TBs gibt es kein Geld von mir

das liegt an den tollen Kampfaufträgen, wo man Schaden durch Feuer braucht

geht mir nicht anders - gerade unsere Shima-Pfeife mit ihren 269 EP hat nix gerissen, aber groß das M.ul im Chat und danach aufgerissen! fuhr nicht ins Cap, obwohl ich darum gebeten habe, und mit der Zao bereit stand - nein, schön den Gegner die Caps holen lassen! der hat 2 Salven geworfen, und sonst nix gemacht außer zu schimpfen. er hat 140 Gefechte auf TX - 112 damit mit der Shima - und hat 41% WR Gefecht hat nur 13 Minuten gedauert, weil die meiste Zeit von 4 Caps der Gegner 3 hatte! wenn 66% der DDs Pfeifen sind, was will man machen, außer Gegner abfackeln und versenken?

habe es schon seit 2 Tagen aufgegeben - schont die Nerven.

außer man heißt Nelson und hat alle Kanonen nach vorne - und fährt rückwärts

also vorhin hat man mir nur erzählt, es war schon mal so, also ja. auch das man dann ab ca. T6 startet bzw verbilligt ran kommt - oder so ähnlich.

evtl. ist der Nebel nach oben hin breiter - so ne Art Tornado. darum hat man ihn nicht eher gesehen, bzw er die Flieger nicht. und wenn der Nebel wieder weg geht, verschwindet er zuerst "oben am Trichter".

die Aufträge zum erspielen/gewinnen der Schiffe läuft meines Wissens eh bis Ende des Monats, also werden sie evtl. nicht mal zur GC kommen. oder nur dort spielbar sein, aber releast erst nach der GC

umskillen ist ab morgen billiger - Geburtstagsangebote https://worldofwarships.eu/de/news/premshop/happy-berth-day/

zum AA-Thema hat sich WG erklärt - siehe den anderen CV-Thread.

um das Thema endgültig zu beenden, hier die offizielle Antwort auf die Skill-MM Frage. Q: When you will fix damn MM for ranked battles? ( Person asked if we will get balanced teams by SKILL) R: For random battles, never. For ranked it already counts player league. They are going to introduce some intresting choice for clans regarding ranked battles.

so, hier mal ein paar neue Infos. Q: In patch 0.6.0, Air Groups mod.2 was buffed to have a +50% fighter ammo modifier, a significant change. When asked as to why it was done, Sub_Octavian answered that it was to "buff the less skillful playerbase (of USN CVs)". I have asked many times since then on how it has affected the balance of CVs and all I got was either "we don't know the answer to that" (WGNA facebook Q&A) or "the change has affected balance positively", with no specific stats whatsoever. Did the change indeed buff the less skilful players? Since then, I found that a good player will now use the extra ammo to utterly whack enemy CVs that are less skilled. Did it even buff USN CV WR in the first place? A: The cost of mistake when using strafe has lowered, and also, USN fighters can deal some damage not only to the 1st strike wave, which is good. We think it was a good addition, but as for USN CV, more changes are needed, and they are coming. Q: Concerning the Enterprise, it would be nice if WG could explain how AP bombs work in detail. Certain BBs such as KM BBs and Fuso seem to take huge damage while others might take less. Also, the autodrop and panic drop is tiny and it seems braindead (no-skill). Why was it released in this state? We now have a no-skill CV (vs BBs, that is) that has near-infinite fighter reserves. A: Enterprise AP bombs arm at 70 mm and penetrates around 184 mm. So horizontal armor of a target really matters. Later, we may add AP bombs with different values and they will interact with other ships differently. The difference between auto drop and manual is around 20% which is nice for premium ship in our opinion. However, the angle of approach really matters, as the drop pattern is very stretched. So I wouldn’t call it no-skill. Q: Greetings spotter, who do the developers believe are better suited to balance the game; a good player who uses an objective approach or a highly subjective average/bad player? Following this, how do the developers believe they really can balance carriers, because it's been two years since the game has released and from the perspective of a decent carrier player, the patches towards carriers has been horrible, and not to be rude but from the public stats of the developers, nearly none of them play high tier carriers. A: Hi. Overall, ships should be balanced based on those players who are most frequent in randoms – sad but true. However, taking skill into consideration is a must, that’s why we have tools for that. However, the majority of playerbase is primary, we cannot balance the game around 10% of audience. As for playing CVs, well, I am definitely not good at it for now, but those developers who play CVs and do Game Design, are quite good at it. No offence too, but our goal is to create a good game, not to be top players and play all day long instead of working. You don’t expect a piano creator to be the best piano player, right? Q: Are there any plans to make AA mechanics more enganging for the non-cv players?The current AA mechanics is one of most terrible mechanic in the game due to its hard to balance;either the AA is too strong or too weak. Are there plans to at least make the secondary armament controllable to use as flaks against CV plane attacks? The secondary armament damage may be reduced in exchange for a ''scatter like effect'' (similair to Defensive fire & fighter attacking) and punish concentration attack from 1 direction ,forcing the CV to take multiple angle to attack.Furthemore,forcing non-CV player to actually stick together to cover multiple angles . The CV can be compensate with more option to attack (ex;adjusting altitude that affect AA effectiveness such as higher altitude less prone to small AA damage but longer drop time in exchange , torp range & speed). I doubt the dev will ever change the AA Mechanics anytime soon.However ,its essential to improve AA balance and make it more enganging for both non-cv and cv players . A: Overall, we think AA mechanics can really benefit from improvements, but we cannot afford it right now, and busy with other CV-connected problems.

schrieb ja maximal. der normale Grind kostet 244120 bei den Amis bis zur Colo - alle Schiffe voll ausgebaut.

dann gibt doch mal der Zentrale weiter, bei max. 350k liegt unsere Schmerzgrenze

ok, wieder was gelernt, es war/ist so gewollt. nur, wer denkt sich denn sowas aus?