Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

hgbn_dk

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    44366
  • Clan

    [DC_DK]

Everything posted by hgbn_dk

  1. hgbn_dk

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Have you tried playing the objective?? Might help a bit
  2. Just what it said in the article. They probably add an option to buy Florins for Crowns. But it is first next week so I'm as curious like you
  3. Depends on how many Crowns you got. In the fourth week only you can exchange 5 Crowns for 40 Florins
  4. And goofing around cost the other players on your team to lose..
  5. They would not be able to land again on a CV.. No tail hooks
  6. If you have seen any P-40 on a carrier its only because it was transported by such. P-40 was solely a land based aircraft
  7. hgbn_dk

    Is the WoWs grind too generous

    Sound good in theory but Don't work in practice. You'll need the bypass through money mechanic to fund the game. Making it skill gated will only accomplish a lot of players to quit the game all together.
  8. hgbn_dk

    Is the WoWs grind too generous

    Agree the amount of special expendable camouflage bonuses is maybe a tad to high imho. They actually makes it less lucrative to invest in a premium camouflage for silver ships.
  9. hgbn_dk

    Is the WoWs grind too generous

    Still requires a good player and to have said signals and camouflages.. As a new player it will be difficult to stack so many bonuses.
  10. Who plays ranked with only a 10 pointer??
  11. hgbn_dk

    Is the WoWs grind too generous

    I'll think keyword for rushing through the lines as newish player is real money. If you are a F2P player with no premium ships it will take quite a while to reach T-X. Guess someone has to fund the game.
  12. hgbn_dk

    Is the WoWs grind too generous

    XP is fine as it is. Credit costs for the high Tier ships slows down the new and average players. I see no need to call for any changes.
  13. hgbn_dk

    LWM Exeter review

    Just play it like you would play Pensacola or New Orleans...
  14. Took the last option. I say balance is most important, if a ship is strong enough to get moved up a tier without making it to weak, then move it up. If a ship don't fit up tiered then balance it at the tier it is now.... Keyword should be BALANCE
  15. hgbn_dk

    Cloned (and similar) ships: too many!

    I would instant buy a Salt Lake City clone of the old T-VII Pensacola if they ever make one. You can't have to many ships to choose from. So no it isn't to many
  16. Except in this case you'll get a more expensive alternative.....
  17. Agree. I'm not saying they should be changing premium ships without a good and legit reason. Think balance is a good reason. Its certainly better to fine tune a ship rather than removing it from sales and let those who have it. keep their OP boat .
  18. And your point is??? That tittle is so full of P2W so who cares?
  19. They have to start somewhere. It would have been the same fuzz if they had picked Belfast first.
  20. Think people need to think what they are really buying, when they buy a premium ship.. You're not buying a physical product, not even pixels since you can't use it outside the game. You buy entertainment nothing more. So in the end you have to weigh it on that premise.
  21. Just food for thought. If all ships was balanced and available for sale. Wouldn't you not prefer to have a choice of just buying the ship you want in the shop. or get it via loot boxes?? I rather see them both in the shop and boxes. Not everyone buy santa boxes for just that very rare ship. Guess most buy them for just dropping a ship or two regardless of what it is.. I could understand the fuzz if It was a Tier VI and it got moved to Tier V. Then you would have a reason to complain about a devalue. We agree to disagree and peace with that.
  22. No it isn't, It is exactly two sides of the same thing. If you want to keep your premiums immune from changes, then you have to accept what you bought regardless of state. Balancing goes both ways if anything has to be fair...
  23. Funny enough I never see complaints of changing a product when a premium gets buffed.... So just double standards. Rest my case
  24. They don't want to get rid of Guilio Cesare they want to sell many more. That's the purpose of this rebalancing act. To be honest I can't see the problem. In the end you're getting a more expensive product than you paid for. Game balance is in my point of view more important than letting some to have a OP premium and the rest can't get it.
  25. hgbn_dk

    Opinion: What looks better on the Warspite?

    One of my favourites in the modpack
×