hgbn_dk
Players-
Content Сount
3,370 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
44366 -
Clan
[DC_DK]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by hgbn_dk
-
Nope do not have them.... No disaster just weird
-
Just weird.... then
-
I have no mods and have not got any rewards.. Disappeared with the patch it seems
-
Tried it but no cigar..
-
No brainer it's a keeper.. If you regret selling it you can't buy it back
-
Happy that I own all 3 of them.. and never will sell any of them
-
Stalingrad confirmed tier 10 cruiser, lets review what we know
hgbn_dk replied to Affeks's topic in General Discussion
And??? There are plenty of real ships that was build and commissioned missing in game.. Create those first.. Then you can do paper projects later- 128 replies
-
- stalingrad
- new tier 10 cruiser
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Stalingrad confirmed tier 10 cruiser, lets review what we know
hgbn_dk replied to Affeks's topic in General Discussion
Great another fictional papership- 128 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- stalingrad
- new tier 10 cruiser
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Alaska class large cruiser. It would fit perfectly in T-VII as a BB. Would be cool to have this cruiser killer to fight the other battlecruisers at T-VII.
-
With the old system it was easier to find the Yamato's just had to look at the corner most far away from the battle
-
Wargaming, when will we have new maps?
hgbn_dk replied to elblancogringo's topic in General Discussion
It was a good map... Even T-Vi cruisers had good survival chance against T-IX BB's on that map -
Damn I'm mad... Been disconnected 5 times today, twice in a middle of a battle. And no it is not in my end the flaw rests.... FIX it now...
-
eeehh no Fiber optics and I have full connection speed.
-
Alaska can never fit the tech tree as a cruiser. To OP for even T-X
-
The Alaska's was never classified as battlecruisers because the USN never used this term. And no we don't need another papership
-
Reward ships no any other premium yes.
-
This is not about the oil gathering theme I wrote like I did. Its about the people who populate the clans. You can roughly divide our clans members in two groups, the casual players who just enjoy the TS company within the clans, and the guys like me who participate in training room clan battles. I think a clan should be at a size that it can hold both groups as a single unit so the casual part don't feel they are sub par and not part of the "elite" clan, to me there is only one clan. Its all about the passion for and interest of the game, and secondary social networking in the clan.
-
Why should all the clan members not benefit the bonuses the most active sub clan produces?? There is only sub clans because you can't make clans big enough to room all clan members..
-
it only prevents chat messages from those on the blacklist
-
Basically just another money grab
-
Our 2 clans have decided to use first 20k to expand the size of the clans. Then we decide on what to build next. If you ask me standard size should be 50 and then expandable to 75 and last 100.
-
This was Essex full strike planes shot down from a match just played. Yes he did managed to strike me with one torp squad and a bomber. but they all died
-
One example current clan battles. one huge smoke camping party. Extremely boring and static. Its all about hiding in smoke and waiting for the other team to making a mistake. Ranked same thing It takes no skill to play as a BB if you can hide in smoke and just pound away. just to mention a few
-
Well they do run a company you know.. They have to adjust to meet the largest group of potential paying customers. Its all about the bottom line at the end of a fiscal year
-
SMOKE META IS BROKEN!! DD's and CL's are not going to be seriously affected. Only CA' and BB's will feel the full effect.
