GarrusBrutus

Be smart and stop caring about grindy missions that yield pathetic rewards. Stop fooling yourself that it's worth it: you will gain another port queen who you will use only the first few times or some flags and camos.

Gotta love the good old "sail into the cap whilst smoking and stopping broadside inside my smoke"-DDs who promptly get torped.

Restat as in give ships new values for speed, armor, etc. Etc.? No. Or do you mean restat as in wows-numbers? That is a third party site that WG has no control over.

Step 1. Forget you have torps and do not try to cap points early game. Step 2. Drop concealment expert since you will be spotted anyway. Step 3. Take AFT for max range. Step 4. Go towards a flank and be ready to kite the enemies. Step 5. Get spotted, so the enemies start firing at you. Step 6. Speed dodge and keep firing back. Step 7. Profit.

If you can handle honest and constructive criticism from experienced players, upload some replays on here or sent them via pm. There will always be some people willing to take a look and provide feedback. I would be glad to help.

The lion is always hungry for fresh meat, join now!

Exactly. The no concealment-expert and AFT ones, such as Udaloi and Tashkent. Lovely boats to play when you do not want to care about lineups and teams. Just do your own thing.

Try gunboat DDs. They do not care about radar since you're openwater gunboating the entire time anyway.

Classic. Man pitches an idea to an experienced audience, only to find they don't like his idea and instead of critically looking at his own idea he blames the audience for being non-constructive. No wonder you've been met with the same attitude on your previous forum. Cause and effect, my friend.

G4y_panda. EZ GG.

Yes.

Exactly my thoughts about CBs in general since the introduction of CVs. Because of this: There is no skill involved in the fight against a FDR, or any carrier for that matter. The only "skill" if you will, is how good you can huddle up against each other and pray for RNGesus to bless you with only 1 or 2 hits. So. Much. Fun. I cant begin to express how much fun this is. This is what I play wows for.

FTFY. The meta is FDR, so you actually do care about the meta. By the way, you have a FDR. So what is the problem? Since you do not care about the meta and you can play the meta. I feel the same about Petropavlovsk. No skill requirement besides sitting bow in and left click. Put some 52% WR player in a bow in petro and profit. Sure you can take a goliath or hinden to "counter" but then the aforementioned FDR comes in and does Omae Wa Mou Shinderou Didnt think this day would come this soon but even Stalingrad is (competetively) powercrept by now.

No, they're not. Yes, you have longe range torpedoes and i know you want to use them. Simple fact is: You cannot use them unless you get into the right position to use them. This often means you can only use them later on in the match when you're kiting on a flank, or when all DDs have died and you're the "frontline" ship.

"Two times I got sent you jail because children just ran in front of my car. When I pressed the gas, nobody was in the way of my vehicle or about to cross the road." As said a million times already: YOUR TORPS, YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. And for crying out loud, do not fire torps from the second line like a frikkin pepega.

<- My Rambo secondary gunner

Exactly. The first thing a team should do is gain map control. By gaining map control you gain vision and angles on the enemy team. Just look at competetive: Often the teams that goes for the caps at the start loses in the end.

Played with a clanmember in Halland. Friendly GK under fire: "Halland smoke me." Sure, want me to radar as well?

Nobody believes that with hidden stats.

I agree 100%. meanwhile.... WG: "Maybe the introduction of submarines will make the game better."

You mean the part where you make some generic statements that everybody is already familiar with? Yeah, really interesting to read.

Yet here you are.... Complaining and evidently giving a f**k.

Do you remember how the matchmaker was in 2015? I'm sure @WolfGewehrstill has some screenshots of back then. The matchmaker isn't perfect but at this point it does a pretty damn good job. The reason you're blaming matchmaker is because it does NOT account for player skill. And I am thankful it does not. :)

No. The nature of the game is cause for washouts. No respawn mechanic, rng, detonations and slow paced gameplay with little chance to overcome an early disadvantage. Play a team of unicums vs unicums and you will still have washouts. Play a team of potatoes vs potatoes, same story. Everyone is talking about an even distribution of skills across both teams. Yet random is as evenly as it gets in the long run. Going deeper smells like skill based matchmaking...

How are these systems failing? I reckon you think they're failing because of many one sided stomps? This is not due to MM or any other system failing, my friend. That happens due to sheer incompetence by the playerbase. Thanks to wargamings glorious pay2progress business model.