GarrusBrutus

That would defeat the whole purpose of ratings.

Redcap, you can play as many teams as your clan can field. The same as with divisions in randoms actually. The only difference with clanbattles is that you can have teams play on different ratings. So you can have 3 teams play alpha rating at the same time, or have them split between different ratings. But there is no limit as to how many teams play on a rating at any given time. So this... ...isnt true.

@Redcap375 Are you telling me you thought that each team had to play on a different rating for 11 seasons now? Oh my....

Hindenburg is back in town baby! Its DPM at 18-20km due to the accuracy and shell velocity is just insane.

One of the most important things in ranked is finishing off targets. A low hp DD that gets away can be a thorn in your side, a BB that escapes on low hp can come back half hp later in the match, etc. So @Micheal_Page You have to focus more on finishing low hp targets in order to get a higher winrate. For reference: My avg kills/game vs yours (note. Very few games so obviously it doesnt say that much, but the general rule of thumb still holds: a higher avg kills/game often yields a higher winrate)

Funny how bb players think this is a good weapon against pesky island camping he spammers. Little do they know that it's just another FDR-esque way to power farm BBabies.

Piece of advice: play max. 15 ranked battles a day. No more. And take breaks between every couple of battles. You just get frustrated and start to play bad. Happens to me as well.

Playing that many games in two days is impossible. Or you are simply yoloing in and dying each game like it is coop.

Stop DCP'ing every single fire. Problem solved.

@_Conan_Librarian_ You say you understand why wargaming created these unrealistic mechanics for the sake of balance and fun, after which you start to complain about the same mechanics being unrealistic. Confusing, to say the least. It's also peculiar how you do not mention for example the historical hitratio of battleship guns, or the historical speed of ships, or... Well... Basically everything in the game that isn't a 1 on 1 simulation. How on earth did you reach 6k games in this game if unrealistic hydro/radar/etc. bothers you this much?

WORLD OF WARSHIPS I CANNOT PLAY PROPER HEALTHCARE AN OCEAN AWAY YOU GUESSED IT RIGHT IM FROM NA

WG: say no more fam! Here, airstrikes!

Ranked just started. Atleast my clanmates are all playing ranked....

Still didnt beat this 373K game. :(

Thanks guys for keeping the servers running by spending ludicrous amounts of money on mediocre content.

You do not need 100k coal every month though.

Haven't seen one in my life. But the doctor said it could be something Genetic.

The minimap isn't supposed to rotate.

Thunderer doesn't suck. If you needed that extra bit of range you're probably not getting the most out of the ship anyway.... Litteraly everyone hates playing against this abomination of a ship. Perhaps even more so than smolensk.

In the end this is just a bandaid by wargaming trying to fix a major open wound that is the disaster of the WoWs economy. Back in the day the eco was pretty straight forward and harsh but now you have 9000 different resources and 100.000 kinds of buffs with flags/camo's/premium/events/clan-sh!t. Yeah such a shock that people who play every day have tons of resources and nothing to spend it on.....

you didnt, but I did. Sorry i wrote it wrong.

My point is that your claim that a 300 mil bid for 100k coal is reasonable, if the reason behind it is: 100k coal is more valuable to me than 300 mil credits. That has nothing to do with real life, fata morgana's, gambling addictions or whatever.

What is your point? People spend hundreds of euro's on this fata morgana game for their pleasure, yet it's quite obvious that world of warships dubloons/credits/coal/steel have zero value outside of the game.