-
Content Сount
3,711 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
12527 -
Clan
[RAIN]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by GarrusBrutus
-
Meanwhile at WG office: "Look, 5% says yes! Lets do it!"
-
@Bergwolf at 5:01
-
Triple 45%WR div. Bigger influence... Well yeah, but positive? best way to improve is using the help of the forumites as you said Ferry. @Barney_Wobba take an example to @Saltface in receiving constructive criticism to his replays and becoming a better player. Works wonders I promise. If only I had discovered this option when I started to play the game I would have saved myself from making so many mistakes again and again lol.
-
Why Belfast is needed in game
GarrusBrutus replied to The_Shungite_Wizard's topic in General Discussion
Imagine the threads on the forum saying "this cheater was invisible even when I radared him!" -
campains captains, and ....weaknesss
GarrusBrutus replied to remenberMYname's topic in General Discussion
As has always been the case with special captains so far. And for a player like yourself, who plays 1000 battles per month..... It shouldn't be too hard to get them to 19pts rigth? -
Why Belfast is needed in game
GarrusBrutus replied to The_Shungite_Wizard's topic in General Discussion
OP's name plus name of the thread combined is -
@Praevasc Exactly. Players are whining about the matchmaking when they lose but never do you see a thread "Matchmaking is excellent! I played like a sack of potatoes but still won 7 games in a row." you win a couple in a row and you lose a couple in a row: this is the way the game works.
-
Yelling at CV's for no fighter cover (rework)
GarrusBrutus replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion
Earned it? Why? Because the gamedesign was bad and they complained about it and it got worse for them? OK.... -
Clearly it was the CVs fault.
-
Seriously no one? Cmon guys. G I T G U D
-
Stupid game made by stupid people....
GarrusBrutus replied to anonym_2oqo4L9NFR1q's topic in General Discussion
Is that a wambulance I'm hearing? -
stalingrad armour bug? ( back turrets)
GarrusBrutus replied to Flavio1997's topic in General Discussion
Yes but those weren't designed to be OP.- 29 replies
-
- 3
-
-
The lower the tier the easier it is to carry a team. So in general for players on the 50% and up bracket of the winrate scale, lower tiers have higher solo winrates than higher tiers. Ofcourse there are exceptions.
-
@NothingButTheRain The only way we can "fight" this is to have a positive attitude ourselves. Give out compliments to good plays, offer advice to bad ones in a friendly and civil way. You can start calling him names back but it will lighten his fire even more. You can ask him sincerely why he is so upset that he felt the need to write you a message, but he will probably just call you more names. Best to just ignore and block/mute them. As probably all mothers in the world say to their children: Just ignore the bad ones. They are few. The good ones are the ones that deserve your energy. You sound quite negative about this is the sense that it happens to you a lot and that you encounter a lot of negativity ingame. I'm sorry I dont feel the same way, but I'm glad that I mostly meet "cool" people. Last but not least: It is the internet. People calling me moron? Oh no!
-
stalingrad armour bug? ( back turrets)
GarrusBrutus replied to Flavio1997's topic in General Discussion
So if you want to save your turrets from being knocked out, just point them the other way.- 29 replies
-
- 3
-
-
Of all the problems WG should deal with that I can come up with, reworking the ramming mechanics would probably be at the bottom of the list. Insignificant.
-
Sure I can sugarcoat it but this is just the way it is. And I cannot imagine that this person has fun being dead all the time and suffering the angry comments of his/her team, hence the thread. At the same time you know OP started this thread because of all the toxicity in the chat. Which means he encounters a lot of people that aren't having fun. I wonder why. I wish for everyone to have fun in this game. Unfortunately that is quite hard with the skill differences being so enormous.
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
GarrusBrutus replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Is that HIV shooting Montana kryptonite? -
Im sure your team fucked up a bit more than a micro bit. Meanwhile, all our full hp NC had to do was contest a cap right in front of him to stop their points ticking for about 10 sec and we would have won. But instead he chose to sail around the cap. Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
-
I can understand you hate the chat since most teammates will absolutely detest having you in their team and rage towards you. You have a lot to learn to be even remotely useful to your team. Your average damage is not even good for tier 1 standards. Your survivability rate is really bad, which means you die too soon and too many times. You kill an enemy every 6!!!!! games, which is really bad. I could go on and on but the point is: Having you on the team severely lowers the chances of a win. Please, take some time to learn a little bit more of this game. It will be more fun for you to play and less salt/toxicity from players towards you.
- 29 replies
-
- 11
-
-
Whats the deal with players like this WG?
GarrusBrutus replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
@RAYvenMP I envy people who haven't been in a team with this guy. -
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
GarrusBrutus replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
Luckily you've already played 786 games in the "pre-nerf" Stalingrad. By the way I think you're severely overreacting. All your efforts for nothing? Why so? You have the ship. Is it unplayable suddenly?- 97 replies
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
@Freyr_90 I like the idea. This has been the fourth season and something has to change in order to keep things fresh and interesting. If the format stays the same for the next season a lot of people might refrain from playing entirely.
-
Inb4 the police comes and says "this thread has been closed due to non constructive content."
