GarrusBrutus

Urban legend

Good'ol shima. When played in such a position that the entire enemy fleet is pushing alongside you with nothing to spot you.... EZ GG Enemy Z took a torp at the start, if only he had a way to detect torpedoes....

I havent seen a single video of someone playing this ship that made me think 'Oh boy, that is a really fun and unique ship. GIB PLS.' Instead all i saw was memeworthy armour, longerange HE spamming that the Zao does way better, 20km torps that are of questionable usability due to friendlies being in the way most of the time.... So, no. Ill pass.

It's mathematically true: 1/7>1/12. Haha you probably lost because of those TTT noobs on your team. on a serious note: individual skill isn't the only thing that decides matches. Why? Have you played clan battles? You probably lost to some storm and gale teams while in typhoon. And you won from hurricane teams. Not because your players were individually of different skill then the opponents but because you played better as a group. Same goes for ranked. If your team played to not lose a star and the opponents played to win (coordinated and communicated) its EZ GG even if your team was full of hurricane players.

Not a bad maiden voyage in my new toy, especially for a BB noob like myself. Decided to buy the Georgia after all since she did seem like a fun ship. Oh, the AP shells..... They hurt! And I specced her for maximum accuracy on the main guns: It didnt disappoint.

It has been somewhere on the Dev Blog in the past but it would be nice to get some more info on it.

Spotter plane on us cruisers is useless due to the shell arcs. Fighter plane is not necessary and would relatively make all other cruisers weaker because us cruisers have a good AA system already.

Not sure what you are trying to say with your example since ranked and randoms are two completely different gamemodes. In ranked you can carry six potatoes against 7 potatoes by playing well. In randoms that's a lot harder. The smaller the number of players in a team the bigger the influence per player becomes.

Hey mate, That is true. It doesnt paint the whole picture and maybe what I said was a bit harsh but it isn't far from reality: if you reach rank 1 in over 500 battles it doesn't come down to bad luck/bad rng/shitty teammates. It'son you. Trying to blame other factors is just ignoring the reality of your own shortcomings. @Milan_G_ I've got a nice challenge for you. Try to find me a player with a solo tier 10 winrate of 60%+ who ranked out in more than 150 battles. And then tell me how winrate doesn't show a players skill...

567......................... Dear lord. Why do people feel this is an accomplishment? It's not an accomplishment at all. Sure you committed a lot of time and you showed endurance, but needing this many games to rank out simply means you're not very good at the game.

When MM gives you lemons,

How suprising. Another "BoW selfproclaimed-expert calling others flamers" shitshow. Move along people, nothing to see here.

I don't know about you guys but the last time I saw a YY in randoms was a long time ago....

500 battles. That is an impressive number! Did you play loads per session or some every day?

I wonder why.... Funny thing is that my list is non existent. In history a lot of people silenced those who disagreed with them. Most of the time it turned out very bad for them in the end. You're not interested in stats but at the same time you're interested in stats. If you dont care about stats why do you care about people creating a new account?