Allied_Winter

Wenn es nur dieser eine Post gewesen wäre (und er danach Alarmtauchen geübt hätte), wäre da wohl auch Gras drüber gewachsen, aber es kamen ja noch weitere Posts die durchgehen ALLE sarkastisch gemeint waren. Selbst Sub_Octavian hat sich auf reddit eingeschaltet und nochmal verdeutlicht, dass es sich hierbei nur um Earls eigene Meinung handelt. Und selbst darauf gab es - na klar - einen sarkastischen Kommentar. Und da gehe ich dann mit Shoggy: Das Feingefühl muss ich meinen Kunden gegenüber zur Schau stellen und sowas lassen. Ob ich das in einer privaten Diskussion abseits der Kunden anders sehe, darüber regt sich dann keiner auf. Aber gut, mehr gibt es diesbezüglich glaube ich auch nicht zu dem Thema zu sagen.

An dieser Stelle folgender Hinweis: In diesem Thread wird der Matchmaker diskutiert. Für abweichende, nicht zusammengehörende Themen bitte entsprechend passende Threads nutzen. Für Container z.B. diesen hier: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/128068-mega-weihnachtscontainer-veräppelt/?page=5

An dieser Stelle der Hinweis (den auch Sehales im englischen Forum) gegeben hat: Das ist grundsätzlich erst Mal nur eine Sache zwischen iEarlGrey und Wargaming. Der Rest (vor allem wir Spieler) können das Ergebnis sehen aber auch nicht mehr. Deshalb bitte die Forenregeln achten und zivilisiert bleiben! Meine persönliche Meinung: Wer als Communityverantwortlicher die Tragweite von Witzen von/über eine aufgeheizte Community nicht erkennt (oder erkennen will) und auch noch weiter Öl ins Feuer gießt, ist als Mitarbeiter - gerade in der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit - untragbar. Hat er sich selbst zuzuschreiben. Harren wir mal der Personen die ihn beerben werden.

One post had to be edited. Please keep it civil folks. Despite the heated topic at hand.

One post had to be edited. Also keep in mind that if you disagree with somebody feel free to discuss it. However if you abuse the report function to either show disagreement OR simply to accuse others of wrong doing, you will be reprimanded. Keep it civil and on topic folks. Happy discussing.

Yes I do.

D3. Currently at D4 with no intention nor time to finish that. I've gone for the four ships (3/4 done already) but that's about it. It's ... ok. Same as with PEF or DoY she'll become a snowflake queen though.

That depends on so much that a general answer is difficult. I played 116 battles from start of the directives until three days ago when my vacation ended. Assuming 15 minutes a battle, that's 29 hours of battle time. Over 4 weeks... that's a little over 7 hours a week. So one hour a day of battle time. With port idling and captain selection and waiting for a ship to come back from battle after you died early I'd say 2 hours tops per day. However that is for players that have every necessarry booster available.

True. On the other hand, Flamu was also stating just his opinions. And so was - to a certain degree - everybody else. And that's probably the caveat of my perspective: Carry Potential >> everything. BUT! If I had to choose just one pure fun boat regardless of carry potential: DPM = FUN. Hence why I'm aiming for the Colbert and do like the Smolensk. Strong ships that also have great DPM.

Try solving a CV with any CV is ... questionable. Sure Neustra might hold out a bit longer, but ... eh. Ooops. Thanks for pointing that out. Mismatched her in my mind. Will change that. Of course it doesn't. As it's mostly Flamu's opinion. But yeah, the steel price is one issue. I mean ... you almost get two Blacks for the price of one Neustra. Sooo a DD that's meant to be a good 1v1 against enemy DD's beats an enemy DD in a 1v1 ... ok. Nothing I'd do, but you do you. Personally - and for randoms - I'd still take radar over a heal anytime of the day. Because the zombie heal is useless when you get chunked down by all sorts of shells from 1/3 of the enemy team during one radar. I think we have to agree to disagree. I don't rate the Neustra as well as the Black.

Neustra has more HP and a Zombie heal. However coupled with rather poor DPM on guns and a mediocre concealment. Black has radar and smoke on a Fletcher basis (which already is a good basis). And given how many situations can be solved by radar - and not HP - I'm putting my money on the Black. Nobody's denying that. I mean ... look at her stats. In Q4 less than 300 unique players played her on the EU server for a measly 4000 games. That's roughly 15 games per player. Not really much for a ship that's "way better than Black" if you ask me. In fact it shows that this ship is not just for everyone, but hardly anyone.

Hard hitting torps with the largest blast radius in the game, excelent smoke plus radar combination to dakka dakka on everything. But I'd say we simply disagree here. There's the problem. Just because it feels like that to you, doesn't mean it's true. She's trollish, yes. But that's about it. That's then just bad RNG. I mean... with a bunch of replays you can not prove that the sigma is bad. After a few hundred games with bad dispersion one could prove that SOMETHING maybe off. But you can not prove Sigma that way. Indomitable and Yudachi are just too new to give a meaningfull, well suported opinion on them. Prinz Eugen I rate far better than e.g. Irian (but again: That is just my personal opinion). Roma isn't as bad as people make her out to be. Sure the dispersion is quite trollish, but other than that? Good armour to counter IFHE spam and good stealth to still get close when uptiered. And Zeppelin, while true she's bad, ever thought of the fact that Flamu simply plays too little CV to form an opinion on her. Because what I see here, is that Flamu put out a subjective list that you disagree with. And you know what. That's fine.

Jup. Da war ein Denkfehler bei mir drin. Danke! Wird gleich mal korrigiert.

Well ... let's put it this way: When I look at the team setup and see a Neustra in my team ... and a Black in the other ... I automatically assume that my team is at a huge disadvantage: Mostly because most Neustra's I met were really really bad. Sure there might be the occasional unicum that makes her work. But at the same time. That unicum would do X-times better if he'd sit in the Black instead of the Neustra. So ... I can understand his point about her. Which is clearly wrong. She still has her 2.05 --> https://wowsft.com/ship?index=PRSC509&modules=1111&upgrades=000000&commander=PCW001&consumables=1111 Rushed? By what standard? Sure there are more premium ships out there, that I personally would add to that list. While I'd rate Prinz Eugen as actually quite ok. But that's akin more to personal opinion. Which, by the way is the same with Flamu. It's just his opinion (and not a dogma about the be all end all list of worst ships)

I beg you pardon? True the rules state that one should post in a constructive manor. Now if you could please point to where it was not? All I was saying was, that each and everybody is allowed to spend their money in a way they find suitable or not. Also note: I'm first and foremost a player like any other. So what I posted was my opinion and only that. Have a nice day.

Hover mal unten links über deine Punkte pro Minute. Wenn da sowas steht wie "sie werden Stufe 36 von 36 abschließen" reicht es für das Schiff.

Usually that "earn more" is more XP due to winning more often in a - proper - division. If you want to get better, I can wholeheartedly recommend the "HelpMe!" Discord. A Discord server where veterans and CC's help those that are curious about the game mechanics and want to learn more about the game.

Auf reddit hat einer den aktuellen (bzw. zum Zeitpunkt dieses Posts eine Stunde alten) Stand in der HoF gepostet: Quelle. Alle die also auf EU und ASIA später fertig werden, kommen vielleicht noch in die HoF, müssen aber für die PR noch in die Tasche greifen. Ein paar Streamer haben die PR for free bekommen, mussten aber Direktive 7 nicht machen und tauchen somit auch nicht in der HoF auf. Einer MUSS Direktive 7 machen wenn er die PR for free haben will und streamt dass auch. Der ist aktuell bei irgendwas um die 150h Stream Time (mit zusätzlicher Zeit die er abseits des Streams das Spiel gespielt hat).

Hallo @CashesONE , da du anscheinen noch relativ neu im Forum bist, scheinst du übersehen zu haben, dass es einen Sammelthread zum Thema Matchmaking gibt: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/114961-matchmaking-in-der-kritik/ Bitte alles MM bezogene dort diskutieren. Ich mach hier mal zu.

One post had to be removed. Please stay constructive. Thanks folks.

Well since we didn't even field enough players to make it for the 8v8 ... guess what happened to the 12v12. So I'll leave it at that. Can not comment on any further points.

A few posts needed to be edited. Please stay constructive and don't try to derail the topic (e.g. via trying to incite other players in a nonconstructive way).

A few posts needed to be edited. Please stay constructive and don't try to derail the topic (e.g. via trying to incite other players in a nonconstructive way).

A few posts needed to be edited. Please stay constructive and don't try to derail the topic (e.g. via trying to incite other players in a nonconstructive way).

A few posts needed to be edited. Please stay constructive and don't try to derail the topic (e.g. via trying to incite other players in a nonconstructive way).