Allied_Winter

Ist das tatsächlich die Regel? Mit der E werde ich einen Teufel tun und als Top Tier irgendwas früher heim schicken.

Wenn du bewusst auf Grammatik und Co verzichtest dann ist ein Großteil deines Posts grundsätzlich schon mal als Trolling einzustufen. Gute Umgangsformen gehören zum mindesten hier im Forum. Auch ansonsten bitte Beiträge konstruktiv aufbauen. Sonst ist dass höchstens noch ein Fall für die Frusttherapie: Thread geschlossen.

So far "0". And don't think I will change anything either..

Und weiter gehts mit den Events: Andrew Cunningham gibt es zu erspielen. Wer das ist und was er kann, erkläre ich euch in der aktuellen Episode Events Erklärt. Viel Spaß!

Today is Patch day. So regular, plannend downtime.

Soooo Amagi was a real ship? Afaik she was never built (unless you count "properly planned but scrapped for something else"). Which just puts down further my point: What to count as "real for the game" and "what not". That's a discussion I don't see any point in as I - already stated above - couldn't care less about the heritage of any new content. I just want shiny new stuff that I can have fun with. If that's italian BB's (as apparently the majority complaints was in all the RU cruiser threads I saw) or some imaginary Smolensk/Kronshtadt like RU cruiser line .... whatever .... Would make for a nice camo. In all seriousness: I have fun in the Smolensk with it's paper armour.

I'd question the historical and outright refute the simulator part. WG never claimed that Warsips is a simulator. It's an arcade shooty shooty boat game. Always has been. Sure it is placed in a historical setting, but does that mean that only ships may be used that have seen actual combat? Where to draw the line between "Should be in the game" and "Should not be in the game"? Even prior to the new announced RU cruisers (and even before the RU BB's) there were only TWO (!) tech tree lines (not even whole tech trees) that were 100% real: USN CV's from T4 to T10 and IJN DDs (Shima line) from T2 to T10. All other lines had paper ships of different states in it. Don't get me wrong: I'm all for adding e.g. Italian BB's (though I have no idea how many of them actually were there). I just don't mind which nation should come first. Maybe. Maybe not. We'll see .... I don't talk that much about balance. I'm not good at that and would more often than not ending up with even more game braking stuff if one would let me desing something at the WG HQ (like a Belfast with Heal and RU shell arcs ... ).

Why not? Could just be that the RU archives are easier to access .... or WG really really really wants us to play more Soviet ships. Personally I don't care of what nation or heritage new content is. As long as it IS new content and for me fun to play.

Hawkins already in port, Surrey is displayed next and I have yet to finish the fourth directive.

How many battles in it? If it's not more than ONE (!) battle you can ask for a refund. If not ... well ... tough luck. I'd still apply for a refund nonetheless.

Chapayev doesn't get changed.

If you already have the camouflage? I assume so. At least that's how it worked in the past.

Official Dev Blog Post:

Should be. At least if we go by how previous line splits worked. Got the T8 New Orleans? Get the NEW T7 New Orleans AND the NEW T8 Baltimore on top. Edit: Just as a reminder - Stay Civil! No insults based on nationality, race and so on!

Ja. Und? Deswegen ist doch die Smolensk nicht weniger Reward/Spezial Ship... Das "Reward" bezog sich eher darauf, dass T10 "Premium" Schiffe eben keine echten Premiums sind. Da z.B. die verbesserte Krediteinnahmerate fehlt.

It was said on stream that you WILL keep Moskva when you own her at the time of the line split. That's one. With regards how previous splits happened ... well then you got the NEW ship as well ... so I'd say it's safe to assume that WG does this now again. Of course .... only going from what we saw until now.

Kirov wird ein echtes Premium, Moskva ein Reward/Spezial Ship (ähnlich Smolensk)

Not the Kirov replacement

If that's your only recruit then you're lost. Only from two (or three???) recruits upwards you get cashbacks...

Wasn't there a similar discussion back then when Flint and Black were changed from 3x/5x R1 to steel? That the players that got either ship before the change feel "cheated" because now it's (significantly) less effort to get stuff? I bought the Black ... about a year ago for steel. Am not that miffed, cause I see the upside: Flint for coal! HE Spammers unite!

DEVBLOG: - Smolensk and JB will follow Enterprise, Belfast and GC and made unavailable for sale from patch 0.9.3 onwards. - Black, Flint and Neustrashimy will no longer be available for steel but for coal instead (starting from 0.9.3 onwards) - Marceau will be available for coal - Yashima will be available for steel - Hayate and Smalland will be available for FXP Source:

Yashima kommt laut DevBlog für Stahl. Für wieviel ist noch offen. Quelle:

Gute Frage! Soweit ich das mitbekommen habe, ist das erst Mal die selbe Information, allerdings verzögert das Rendern des Schiffs auf dem Wasser immer etwas. Das war vor einigen Jahren noch sehr gut sichtbar, als ein Schiff auf der Minimap angezeigt wurde, aber das Rendern teilweise mehrere Sekunden (!) gedauert hat. Heute ist das nicht mehr ganz so schlimm. Wobei ich immer noch der Meinung bin, dass man auf der Minimap eher Dinge "sieht" als auf dem Wasser. Ich meine ja, weil der Server kann ja steuern welchem Client er was mitgibt. Z.B: Das Radar Schiff bekommt die Information wo das Schiff auf der Minimap UND auf dem Wasser ist. Die anderen Schiffe bekommen erst Mal nur die Information wo das Schiff auf der Minimap ist. Erst nach 5 Sekunden teilt der Server den anderen Schiffen auch die Position auf dem Wasser mit. Aber das ist nur meine Vermutung wie es logisch wäre (gemessen an dem was wir über die Client-Server Interaktion wissen).

Ich glaube an dieser Stelle können wir die Diskussion wer wem glaubt stoppen (bzw. wer möchte in friedlichen PN's sich weiter austauschen). Jeder hat seine Meinung über das was die Devs (u.a. in Form von Sehales) an uns weiter geben. Angenehmes diskutieren noch. Edit: Ein Beitrag musste entfernt werden. Provokation und Beleidigungen haben hier nichts verloren!

Quick summary: Still the same three recruits I got when you did this the first time, still the same ratio: 1 apparently quit (stuck at 50 recruitement points) the other two play on. I get between 400 and 800 points per week. Only recently I got a huge cashback which indicated that either both spent a lot on christmas boxes or one insta bought the PR ... So yeah, I'm happy with it.