Allied_Winter

As said: Debatable. And in the end that's what this discussion will come down to. Those that like it a different way than presented and those who don't. So? Sure some are bothered by it, but if you read the portal article often enough, you're good. Don't read the portal article? Your loss. Sure it wouldn't. But on the other hand, if all respec is 14 days, WG could basically drop it all together with the clan battle respec and the likes in between. And I highly doubt that that's within their monetazation scheme. So rather than drawing it out to long, make it short and sweet. Which "forces" one to play a clanbattle. What if a player's not in a clan? Or can not field enough players to a clanbattle? You see there's always room for "raising the pitch fork". WG made their decision and sticking with it. Not the decision I would've made, but I can live with the current one as well.

You mean the "Opt-In for captain respec"? This isn't the first time we had that. And from a personal view if given the choice between: Opt-In to respec or have all captains forcefully drop points, I'd much rather take the former over the latter (cause in 95% of the cases I don't respec at all).

Thread nicht konstruktiv. Ich mach mal zu.

That's about as impossible as it gets. There'll always be something where people disagree with either WG or one another to get upset about. All WG can do is go the path of least resistance.

Yeah ... you're at the mercy of RNG once more.

Nah, you're just back to rolling the RNG dice for extra spicy fire chance. Or bust.

Probably get reported by watchful forumites ;)

One post edited. When posting videos, make sure the thumbnails don't break any rules.

How so? While in earlier times you only had Papa Papa signals to gather FXP you now have a multitude of sources that can increase/accelerate your FXP gathering process by quite some factor? Just going by feels I'd say it's nowadays easier for a seasoned veteran to gather FXP compared to Missouri times.

Never denied that. But why should I spend my FXP on something mediocre?

Less so. I mean ... give her smoke and maybe a tad better concealment and I'd be fine with her 2 million price tag.

I say the price of 2 million is justified for something that IS interesting (Pobeda anyone??), but not for some simple copy pasta bote like the Smalland. Also I'd say it's much easier to gather FXP nowadays than back in "Missouri-is-the-only-FXP-ship-days".

I assume so. If we think back to 1v1 sprint: BB's could meet CV's. So I'd say it'll be the same here.

For those who wonder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfKZclMWS1U (Link goes to YT but thumbnail shows something that has no place in this forum!)

What my statement is, is irrelevant. The only thing relevant is, is what WG thinks of them. And to Wargaming CV's are overall in a good enough (= not detrimental to the game) state. If you want my opinion (not that it matters): CV's are imho broken. As they currently are I see little chance for them being balanced in any way shape or form to fit in the game in such a way that the major accepts them. CV's currently are in a state of limbo for WG: Nerf them further (either by improving the AA or lowering their DMG output) and the playernumbers drop (as some play solely because they are "easy" to entry, yet not easy to do remotely well in). BUFF them further and the players of surface ships will revolt more (maybe enough to bring WG so far to actually change them, which would be - as far as I assume - a financial loss for WG). Thus: Leave CV's as they are and concentrate on new ships/lines/classes. Precisely! Thus WG can use them in any way to suit their line of argumentation. As in: As long as the silent majority doesn't care, WG goes the way WG thinks is the best for the game and the future of WG. Which ... overall might not be the worst choice given how bad the community IS at balancing if they are given the choice.

And what makes you think that? Remember: One goal of the rework was to increase CV player numbers. The last time Sub_Oct was asked about that he admitted that the numbers were already on the low end of the expectation. Meaning that any change that could jeopardize the player numbers even more is off the table for WG.

Keep in mind: All forum and reddit together make up less than I'd say 5% of the playerbase. The remaining 95% are simply silent. Enough silent mass to not change anything major according to WG. I mean ... if CV's really were that gamebraking as the forum makes them out to be ... wouldn't you think that the actual majority of the playerbase would've already quit the game? But since playernumbers remain stable enough ...

So und nicht anders! Im Prinzip wollen einige OP Schiffe, aber wenn dann soll bitte nur das OP Schiff im roten Team generft werden, niemals das eigene. Ich frage mich in Bezug auf die GC immer noch wo wir heute wären, wenn die Spielerschaft den Nerf hingenommen hätte. Aber gut.... das ist dann eher eine Diskussion für abends auf ein paar Bier.

Ein neues Gameplay Video! Thema: Schlachtschiffe und wie man im Gefecht die Reparaturmannschaft gewinnbringend einsetzt. Viel Spaß!

Der Punkt auf den El2aZeR hinaus will ist der: Bei anderen Klassenkämpfen haben die Gegenmaßnahmen einen absoluten (wenn man mal von RNG absieht) Schutz zur Folge. Jo. Bin ja auch kein Unicum (in CV's noch viel weniger als mit Oberflächen Schiffen), aber was selbst meiner einer mit CV's anstellen kann .... immerhin bin ich meinem Team als CV kein Klotz am Bein (ok ... manchmal schon noch, aber es wird weniger).

Wenn es dem Support gemeldet wurde, dann ist das ok. Mehr können wir hier im Forum auch nicht tun. Thread geschlossen. Und beim nächsten Mal bitte auf Naming von solchen Spielern verzichten.

Korrekt.

Du darfst nicht vergessen: Manch Forist ist hier seit Jahren aktiv und hat dieselben Fragen schon tausende Male gelesen und leider viel zu selten annehmende Fragende getroffen. Ansonsten: Herzlich Willkommen im Forum! Trotz allem. Ich erkläre mal kurz: Sollte dein Thread einfach nur etwas Frustabbau dienen, dann hat SkipperCH weiter oben schon den Link zur "Frusttherapie" gesetzt. Da kann nach Herzenslust Frust abgebaut werden. Manchmal braucht's das. ABER: Forenregeln gelten trotzdem! Auch wenn es der Offtopic Bereich ist. Für Fragen/Anregungen/Kritik rund um das Matchmaking (ich las oben bei dir was von "Low Tier"?) gibt's dann noch den angepinnten MM Thread: Da gibt's auch viel Anregung wie man z.B. als Low Tier mit einer Situation umgehen kann. Ansonsten kann ich dir noch die "Neueinsteiger" Sektion empfehlen: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/forum/171-neueinsteiger/ Du hast zwar schon weit über 700 Gefechte, aber es gibt immer irgendwas neues zu entdecken. Deshalb einfach mal da rein schauen Grundsätzlich: Versuche deine Themen "Neutraler" zu formulieren. Anstatt: "Warum kann ein kleines Torpedoboot unendlich Torpedos spammen bis die ganze Karte voller Blindläufer ist?", einfach "Wie kann man mit Torpedo DDs als Gegner besser umgehen." Dann hat man gleich eine viel konstruktivere Basis zum diskutieren. Die ist hier nicht gegeben und ich mache den Thread zu.

Willkommen im Forum @Shells_and_Fish Bitte beachte, dass zu bestimmten Themen bereits Threads existieren. Besonders das MM Thema wird heiß diskutiert. Z.B. hier: Nutze doch bitte diesen Thread um weitere Fragen und Anmerkungen zum Thema anzubringen. Bitte bleibe dabei aber sachlich und konstruktiv. Thread geschlossen.

Which it already was before. Didn't stop a lot of players choosing it. Iirc Sub_Oct said one time, that roughly 20% of the playerbase value concealment (and the necessary builds). While it's not a confirmation that 80% of the players used TAM (and will use the new module), the numbers were suprisingly high (like that Asashio that got me once killed in my Lightning due to him having TAM slotted. My question for the "Why?" was answered with: "Don't know, don't care!"). So in short: From a good players perspective it is a noob trap. From the average players perspective it doesn't matter.