Allied_Winter

This. To make it short... plus: I get to "revisit" some lines that I've played ages ago (e.g. IJN cruisers, USN DD's) that I wouldn't have touched if there wasn't some ... extra in it.

Zwei Doppelposts entfernt. Bitte haltet auch weiterhin die Forenregeln ein. Danke

Danke, ebenso! Und damit keine Trolle auf irgendwelche Gedanken kommen, mache ich den Thread zu. Wenn du Fragen hast zur Moderation bitte via PM an uns Mods oder gleich an Sehales! Thread geschlossen

Also nochmal @Herman_German 1. Warum dein erster Thread geschlossen wurde, wurde ja schon hinreichend erläutert. Es ist leider keinem geholfen wenn jeder zu einem Thema einen neuen Thread aufmacht. Deshalb auch: 2. Der Verweis auf den bereits existierenden Thread um dort eine etwaige Diskussion fortzuführen. Wenn du der Meinung bist dass die Navigation durch das Forum unübersichtlich ist, dann danke, werde ich weiter geben. Mehr können wir Moderatoren an der Stelle auch nicht tun. 3. Verschoben habe ich gar keinen Beitrag. Lediglich auf den vorzugsweise zu benutzenden Thread hingewiesen. 4. Wenn ein neues Thema tatsächlich und sachlich eine allgemeine Diskussionsgrundlage bietet (was "Frustthemen" selten erfüllen), dann gibt es auch keinen Grund diese zu schließen. Deshalb, bitte einfach an die Forenregeln halten und vielleicht die Frusttherapie als "Lesezeichen" im Browser ablegen.

Gebannt wirst du dafür nicht. Nur an die passende Forumssektion verwiesen. Genauer gesagt den passenden Thread der extra dafür kreiert wurde: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/7118-frusttherapie/ Thread geschlossen

Versteh mich nicht falsch: Ich bin definitiv für einen solchen separaten Modus. Auch wenn ich ihn nicht spielen würde, aber es gibt ja doch den einen oder anderen der an sowas Spaß hat. Bleibt nur noch bei WG genügend Stimmung dafür machen.

Und selbst das wage ich zu bezweifeln. Mittlerweile hab ich doch genug Spieler gesehen die einfach nur "BUMM BUMM BUMM" machen wollen. Denen es egal ist ob sie 100k oder 250k Credits bekommen. Denen es egal ist ob sie gewinnen oder verlieren. Denen es egal ist ob ihre Mitspieler dabei Spaß haben oder nicht. Und diese Spieler wird man zu gar nix animieren.

Wir reden hier von permanent oder nicht? Letzten Endes weiß WG wohl am besten ob sich ein weiterer Modus rechnet: Zum einen ob die Spielerzahlen dass hergeben und zum anderen ob die Spieler sowas überhaupt spielen wollen würden. Der nächste "semi-permanente" Modus werden in 0.9.4 die U-Boot Gefechte. Ansonsten bleibt wohl nur das übliche: Alle Monate mal einschalten um bei CB's mitzumachen.

Klar, aber damit sind wir schon bei drei zusätzlichen Modi die permanent laufen müssten: Permanentes Arms Race Permanente Zufallsgefechte mit Skill Based MM Permanente Clan Gefechte (oder Team Gefechte mit Söldnermodus) Und dass alles bei einer Population von im Schnitt 20k Spielern aufm EU Server .... klar ... Wünschen kann man sich sowas ... aber umsetzbar ist es imho einfach nicht.

Öhm... nö. Als (permanenten) separaten Modus gern, aber Zufallsgefechte sollen Zufall bleiben. Wer Zufallsgefechte mit Schuss haben möchte, kann das dann im Hafen auswählen.

Sure, but that doesn't change the fact that the Dim Don is the outlier in terms of torpedo range among silver cruisers. All the RU cruisers from Svietlana to Chappa have 4km range ... I've just questioned why the Kirov replacement suddenly would've had 8km torps ...

Well ... apart from the Dimitri Donskoi (and some RU premium cruisers) all RU cruisers have 4km as a standard range ... my initial question was: Why did they get something out of the line in the first place.

Mehh disagree here: - Why have 20km on a shotgun like the California/New Mex? Gimme better reload ... imho she was fine until the reload change - Champagne didn't struck me as a particularly strong ship to begin with ... especially since she seems to have a regular heal and not the reduced CD heal that the Gascogne or Massachusetts have. Don't know though how Manfreds change will turn out ... we'll see.

Removed a few posts that violated the forum rules. Please keep the discussions civil.

Because the forum can do nothing to redeem the situation. It can not punish the CC (like WG can). And even other - WG unconnected forums like reddit - have such a "name and shame" rule in their rule book, so it's nothing out of the ordinary here. Again: If you think the CC overstepped multiple lines, report him to WG. Send the replay to Support or - as already suggested - to WG (e.g. MrConway or Crysantos). Also: If you - or anyone else - is unhappy with the moderation that took place, please contact Tanatoy (as the rule lord).

Public naming and shaming is never the solution and against the forum rules. And I don't see how the CC in question gets protected if you report him to WG directly. On the other hand I don't see what the forum can do about that CC in question. Also: What SEN_SEN_Channel_Portugue said, if it gets too much, ignore them, report them to WG.

I removed the replay + the chat log and edited the title, there's nothing the forum can do here. Contact the support or WG employees via a PM, they can revise the situation.

No. Having them researched is enough. Don't have to buy 'em Where did you get that info from Last info from WG is: Having the ships researched IS enough to get 'em.

One post had to be edited. Please follow the forum rules!

Wie schon angesprochen: Manchmal hilft ein Blick in die Frusttherapie. Da sind manche Posts besser aufgehoben. Ich mach hier mal zu

Alright, alright folks. 1. Everyone is allowed to play the game. If you think someone is deliberately harming your game (see the rules of the game for that), contact support with a replay/screenshots. IF that player in questions is actually harming your game (e.g. announced that he'll go AFK, there's a good chance support will act on that). Keep in mind though, that simply being bad at the game doesn't constitute that. 2. Bragging about getting chat bans is a no go! See rule 5 of the forum rules: 5. Don’t discuss illegal/forbidden activities 3. IF you think your chat ban is unwaranted you can contact support to go through your chat logs, but keep in mind what MrConway said in a similar thread a few months ago, that this might also uncover more! Thread locked for being non-constructive

Please note that all information in the development blog is preliminary and subject to change during testing. Showcased features may or may not end up on the main server. Any final information will be published on our game's website. German aircraft carriers The concept of German aircraft carriers employs AP rockets and bombs, and slow torpedoes with high damage. We adjusted the parameters of these ships based on internal testing results before launching tests on the main server. The parameters of the aiming circle and accuracy settings of attack aircraft were changed, and the height of their flight during the attack was reduced. Now it will become easier to conduct the next attack, however, the aiming cone will increase faster when moving; The HP pool of attack aircraft and bombers was increased. For example, the HP pool of researchable attack aircraft of German Tier X aircraft carrier Manfred von Richthofen increased from 1,380 to 1,440, and of researchable bombers from 1,390 to 1,530; Torpedo damage was increased. For example, torpedo damage of researchable torpedo bombers of Manfred von Richthofen increased from 8,200 to 10,200; The "Engine Cooling" consumable action time of torpedo bombers and bombers increased from 5 to 10 s; and the number of charges increased by 1. The "Repair" consumable became available for bombers of Tier VIII and X aircraft carriers August von Parseval and Manfred von Richthofen. IX RIGA HE and AP shell ballistics were changed: shells will lose speed faster when fired at long distances; AP shell armor penetration was reduced. X SHIKISHIMA HE and AP shell ballistics were changed: shells will lose speed slower when fired at long distances; AP shell armor penetration remains almost the same as before changes. We adjusted the parameters of these ships based on testing results.

We'll continue to introduce changes in the updates that will follow, if deemed necessary. VIII ÖLAND Stock torpedo tubes reload time reduced from 70 to 59 s VIII CLEVELAND The "Fighter" consumable was added to the same slot as the "Surveillance Radar" consumable. IX SEATTLE , X WORCESTER The "Fighter" and "Spotting Aircraft" consumables were added to the same slot as the "Surveillance Radar" consumable. VIII NORTH CAROLINA Deck armor plating increased from 37 to 38 mm. V NICHOLAS, VI FARRAGUT, VII MAHAN, VIII BENSON, IX FLETCHER, VIII OGNEVOI The "Defensive AA Fire" consumable can now be mounted on any hull. III AURORA Turret traverse speed increased from 5.3 to 5.5 degrees per second. IV GANGUT Base main battery firing range increased from 12.3 to 12.4 km. III VALKYRIE Main battery reload time increased from 5.4 to 5.6 s. IX JUTLAND Main battery reload time increased from 4.2 to 4.3 s; Torpedo tubes reload time increased from 124 to 125 s. X DARING Main battery reload time increased from 2.7 to 2.8 s; Torpedo tubes reload time increased from 124 to 125 s. II WEYMOUTH "Repair Party" consumable was added; Main battery reload time increased from 8.57 to 8.9 s. V HAWKINS Main battery reload time reduced from 13.5 to 13 s. V T-22 "Hydroacoustic Search" consumable was added in a separate slot. VI ERNST GAEDE "Hydroacoustic Search" consumable can now be mounted when the base hull is used. Aviation: Spotting range of all planes reduced from 17 to 16 km (This characteristic determines at what distance the aircraft is capable of spotting an enemy).

As soon as you re play the ships in that line from T6 onwards. E.g. a win in the T8 IJN DD yields you 1500 research points (or in your case 2 times that). So basically: Regrind the line and from T6 onwards after the first win you get the research points.

They can still talk about what's publicly avaivlable and show their gameplay after the NDA is lifted. So hopefully less clickbait ... we'll see.