Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Allied_Winter

Players
  • Content Сount

    6,242
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    10755
  • Clan

    [CBS]

Everything posted by Allied_Winter

  1. Allied_Winter

    Matchmaking wird schlimmer und schlimmer

    Mich würde interessieren, was da so geschrieben wurde? Also seine Antworten, da ich ja stark annehme das du freundlich (aber bestimmt) auf sein Fehlverhalten hingewiesen hast? Greetings
  2. Es sollte vielleicht erwähnt werden, dass man beide Pakete nur einmal je Account kaufen kann. Greetings
  3. Allied_Winter

    DD players get worse and worse.

    That's why I only tend to smoke still sitting or reversing BBs. But as you correctly pointed out: The generalization is the bad part. I met quite some BB players that charged in, died, and only then asked in chat why nobody smoked them. As if I know what this BBs plan was before he executes it... Greetings
  4. Allied_Winter

    The World of Warships ModStation!

    Yeah, I got also problems with the modpack. Not only am I unable to deselect the (previously installed) soundpack but the installation get's cancelled (by the installer itself) halfway through the installation process with some russian error message. Greetings
  5. Allied_Winter

    Some interesting info around the world

    Sub_Octavian posted an article about shell dispersion to explain how it works: Greetings
  6. Allied_Winter

    How many 19 points captains do you have?

    2 so far. I used the elite commander XP from the first one to boost my second one to the limit (they were both somewhat halfway to 19 anyway). Now I got a bunch of 16s/17s and use the 100% days (including camos and signals) to farm elite commander XP. Comes in very handy for retraining stuff. Greetings
  7. Allied_Winter

    Is Triple Shiratsuyu Divisions Enough to Made BBabies Cry?

    We had a Mahan + 2 Belfast Div yesterday in a T9 match ... it was over really quick with a victory for us. The problem with such a tryhard division is, that neither of us three got a realyy good result from it. Greetings
  8. Allied_Winter

    Some interesting info around the world

    One last question has been answered from the latest QnA. Since my other post is kinda big, I'd like to post that here, and announce that the QnA gathering has been finished. Greetings
  9. Allied_Winter

    Die Dünkirchenflagge wartet auf euch!

    Gültig ab heute nehme ich an? Außerdem: Danke für die durchaus entspannten Bedingungen! Greetings
  10. Allied_Winter

    Dunkirk, also as an Operation perhaps?

    Anybod knows what this is all about? http://wowsdunkirkflag.hscampaigns.com/ Greetings
  11. Es explained above: gimmicky and balanced doesn't necessary exclude each other. Take the RN CLs for example, they are gimmicky yet balanced (to a certain degree I'd say). KM BBs without Hydro would be fine to me, gimmicky enough I might say. Greetings
  12. Well, I'd be one of those players that doesn't really care about nationality. To me the names could be made up and the nations don't matter. A new line needs to have something. Something other than "It's da Royal Navy". If WG for example would bring out a RN line, that - except of Design and Name - would be identical to the, let's say USN BBs, I see no point in playing such a line. A new line needs to have some gimmick, that I can be bothered to play it. Now that doesn't necessarily mean any new consumables. I'm totally happy if WG manages to pull that off without making the line broken. Greetings
  13. Allied_Winter

    New ship preview: Heart of Oak

    In regards to the radar discussion, let me point you to a comment from Sub_Octavian as answer to the question 'Why the RN BBs will have Radar?'
  14. Honestly, standard RN smoke for RN BBs could become a liablilty. First of you have to stop properly to stay inside it (most casuals will mess this up), otherwise ... well remember the early days of RN CLs. Second, with the usuall smoke timer you'll be able to do three maybe four salvos concealed? Third, smoke = torped magnet, with the slow acceleration of BBs that's a recipe for desaster. However if you make the generator just do one puff, you could use it as an escape smoke. The easier it is to disengage, the better I feel at going forward. Greetings
  15. Since Sub_Octavian is still answering questions, it might be worth reading his answer in regards to: RN BBs and radar:
  16. Allied_Winter

    What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it

    Or Kutuzov, or Chapayev Or be happy that my Shima has targets that rarely change course. Greetings
  17. Allied_Winter

    Some interesting info around the world

    QnA with Sub_Octavian is now live on reddit! I'll try to keep up with the questions and answers in THIS post.
  18. Maybe I have to split it more, since Crysantos does actually a pretty decent job of answering stuff. I'd say 2nd levels of tech support stuff. Greetings
  19. Good Lord Thor, Sub_Octavian has more credibility than 2/3 of the WG EU team in regards to reliability and accuracy of information.... hmmmm Greetings
  20. Allied_Winter

    Zao needs a nerf.

    Props to you! But you have to understand the older forumites, that deal with such 'clickbaiting' titles only to discover that the OP is indeed ignorant and thinks he's the only knowledgable person on the forum. Greetings
  21. Allied_Winter

    Zao needs a nerf.

    The thing is, it's generally a bad practice to nerf something good to bring it in line with less good ships. Rather it's better to buff all other items (in this case ships) to bring it on the power levels of the top item (in this case Zao). Hence my quote of Sub_Octavian. Unfortunately it's burried somewhere on reddit and I can't find it atm. Maybe look for yourself. And while you may state your opinion, if you don't bring the necessary 'qualifications' (e.g. played all T10 cruisers extensively) than you're likely to be laughed at for stating an opinion that's out of line with the experience of those who have the necessary 'qualifications' (e.g. played all T10 cruisers extensively). For the same reason you don't see me running around telling politicians how to do their job. While I may have my opinion about certain matters, I know also that this is to 90% only a small portion of all relevant information. Greetings
  22. Allied_Winter

    Zao needs a nerf.

    Please show me where that nasty Zao touched your ship! On a more constructive note: While Sub_Octavian in an earlier QnA more or less confirmed that the Zao is a very strong ship it is more likely that the other (less powerfull) T10 cruisers get a buff somewhere in the future. Greetings
  23. Aber die fallen (zumindest für mich) alle unter Aim-Assist. Gerade das Thema Zitadellen anzeigen. Ich habe mittlerweile auch kaum noch was drauf. Neuinstallation nervt und alles wichtige wurde mittlerweile integriert. Einzig ein paar kosmetische Sachen (erweiterte Hafenansicht) oder den Trainingsraum nehme ich ab und an mal mit dazu. Greetings
  24. Nunja, du kannst dir ja gerne nochmal die englische Stellungnahme durchlesen evtl. habe ich ja etwas falsch übersetzt. Ich gehe davon aus, dass Du noch einen anderen Mod kennst, der einem einen signifikanten Vorteil verschafft. Welchen meinst Du damit? Auch wenn ich mir sicher bin, dass es letztlich darauf hinaus läuft was jeder einzelne (Du, ich, WG) als signifikant im Bezug auf dieses Spiel ansieht. Greetings
  25. In Ergänzung zur o.g. Mod Thematik: 'Wir versuchen jeden neuen Mod zu überprüfen. Aktuell gibt es keinen (anderen) Mod der einem Spieler einen signifikanten Vorteil über einen anderen Spieler verschafft. Sollte ein solcher Mod auftauchen, werden wir diesen auf die Liste der verbotenen Mods setzen.' Ohne den Röntgen Mod gesehen zu haben, bedeutet dass aber für mich, dass dieser ähnlich der 'Umrandung' von Panzern in WoT funktioniert. Die ist zwar auch nicht schön, aber immerhin kein Wallhack. Original: Quelle: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/56433-discussion-thread-for-some-interesting-info-from-ru/page__st__4000__pid__1842747#entry1842747 Greetings
×