Jump to content

Admiral__Chy

Players
  • Content Сount

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    971

About Admiral__Chy

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia
  1. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    Did i ask for BB accuracy to increase or did i ask for cruiser accuracy to decrease?Ohh and tyvm, i did not know what that health potion there was for :O Whats the reuse on the repair and what "charge" limitation compared to the "reuse" on fires starting on ships? I for one got fires started on me every 1-2 salvos from from a murmansk while i couldnt hit him at all due to his zig zaging. Although using the dmg control module + officer skills for the reduced chance of fires/duration. Okay then kind sir if we are to bring up real life stuff into this, bismarcks 15" guns have a max elevation range of 36 km whilst the adm hipper has 33 km, but dose that say anything about "effective range" ?Consider your logic, what shells is more prone to be steered off target by wind and weather conditions at lets say 18km ranges, an 800 kg shell or an 122 kg shell?And omfg really, dose the cleveland have dispersion? With the accuracy module on it? I for one see cleveland salvos fall very close to eachother in a tight circle, as wide as lets say my new mexicos stern section, whilst at 16 km ranges my salvos spread all the way from his bow to stern, And yes i am aware of the cruiser shells being slower, the only thing that actually gives me a bit of chance, but newsflash they dodge my shells far easier than i dodge theirs at long ranges, they return 3 salvos for each of mine, i sometimes fire perfectly lead salvos on them and all shells fall around the targeted cruiser even if hes showing his broadside or i simply get a single hit of 3-4k dmg on him, whilst in turn he already got me up in flames I can live with them being able to fire at the ranges they do, but only if they get stripped down of the pinpoint laserguided accuracy they have, i can live with fires being the main cruiser weapon against us, as long as they cant spam start fires on us from ranges at which we bearly even land 1 shell on them. And yes, i can maneuver my BB in the time it takes those shells to fly, but the BB still turns like a BB and some shells still hit and have a chance of poping a fire Also considering the firing rate of cruisers, constantly maneuvering to avoid as many shells from them as possible in turn kinda screws up my own aiming, because BB turrets dont turn like cruiser turrets ya` know
  2. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    Tyvm for the link and well compare the snail pace of 21 knots with NMs top range being 17.4 WITH the 16% gun range module. (u can imagine the accuracy at 17 km firing cant u?) And i love the NC, alongside the Bismarck and South Dakota and King George V (ships i cannot grind yet but ships im keeping dockslots for hopefully when they will be introduced) But the costs on maintaining her and the incomes i get from playing her (i wasnt able to put any module on her yet, let alone any upgrades) make it close to impossible to even play her and not end up on - per battle and get used to it and the higher tier mechanics.
  3. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    And just to answer to u too, no i do not want them to dominate anymore than they already do, all i want instead is for cruisers to have a taste of dispersion too at long ranges like 14 km +, ranges which i for one find unsuited for cruisers to engage BBs at anyway because it defies any F****** logic, the BB guns suffer dispersion on long ranges making every salvo contain a very very random factor, but the cruiser peashooters do not, who should be the snipers on the open sea, cruisers or battleships? (Not counting the CVs because i mean naval artilery users)I perfectly understand if a DD is that close to torp u as to u being unable to avoid them, then its mostly your fault, or maybe its the cruisers fault for being too busy engaging enemy BBs instead of keeping the enemy DDs in check, because hey, they are the real payoffs not some silly DD that just has what 10-15k hp to burn through? But i find it totally retarded and unjust to have cruisers like the murmansk or the german cruisers be able to snipe you from close to ur maximum ranges while u can bearly even land 1 SHOT that will probably end as a bounce or 1k hit on it due to the dispersion coupled with the cruisers speed and maneuverability.
  4. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    Oh but yes i am, to as far of an extent as the game mechanics and my own will allow me to. And now if u dislike this thread and find it sooooo stupid, please by all means, dont let the door hit u on the way out, im sure u all got better things to do.
  5. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    If u have nothing smart to say and are just here to act as a wiseass and coming up with smartass childish comments that ironize and just increase ur post counter, il kindly suggest, GTFO and get a life outside of camping posts and ironizing people. ^^ And tyvm for the links, and could u stop the sarcasm too, at least if ur trying to look intelligent all the way sir. Id gladly grind every single row and tier out there if i were not limited by the ammount of "dock slots" and the uberly slow progression and the ridiculous maintenance costs of ships i already have, Unlike u or others, not everyone can afford to throw $$$ into video games 1st of all, and 2ndly not everyone is born a "Pro" like most of u posting in my thread And now im wondering, if this "complaining" is a usual "phenomenom", why do u people even bother giving it the time of day and spaming it instead of just letting it die and get forgotten if it has no points at all? Oh right, ya`ll need to increase ur forum ranks too "lol" Either way tyvm for the intelligent suggestions but il pass for now, not everyone is here to try out everything and play whatever he finds to be "better", some of us might be here to actually play whatever we like the most. And PS, whatever smart comebacks u peeps have i still wont find it ok nor will i accept my new mexico being sniped upon by a german cruiser or a murmansk with HE and surely sinking me cause of the ammount of HE damage they land on u combine with the ammount of dmg 1-2-3 fires deal to the ship, because asside from having pinpoint accuracy, they have alot more speed than a battleship, so theres no getting in range to sink him nor getting away from him if he is a good captain and is really set on sinking me and is just zigzaging away poping caps up my stern/bow Nuff said.
  6. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    And mate, see how we are categorised as either bad BB captains or, unaware of the mechanics or whatever other excuse THEY the cruiser or DD captains come up with, while in fact BBs are beaten down by good cruiser captains at long ranges anyday, because they have the rate of fire to permit them to miss alot of shells and still get enough on target to provide some good enough dmg or fires, had countless salvos of 6k+ dmg on me from Myokos for example while my returning salvos did only 1k dmgs per 1 hit, and alot of them missing entirely or getting deflected because the cruisers mobility allows it to evade full salvos, whilst getting close to them to enhance my own chance of a citadel on him gets the whole enemy teams attention on me, because i have to angle my armor accordingly keeping an eye out on enemy BBs too, while the cruiser is just knocking away at me moving away from me keeping the "safe distance"
  7. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    And also mate, if u see me as a troll, for stating my opinions then simply, state your point, and dont let the door hit u on the way out, if my post and complaints are so "UNREALISTIC" then please, stop reading my post and carry on with whatever u were doing before i posted this and ignore me
  8. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    And also, searching around forums looking into NCs efficiency, a so called "tactic" is aparently used by some to increase its efficiency, that tactic being as stated by the one who suggested it, the same tactic used by Iowa/Yamatos, i cant know since i didnt get that far and im not even planing to in thease circumstances, "forget u have a rear turret, just point your bow to the targets and fire away ur frontal guns while pointing the front constantly to the enemy" Seen afew instances of people using that "tactic" in all kinds of different BBs, and the funny thing is, that it actually seems to work, now thats like saying, "get ur T crossed and keep firing away" Now tell me, what battleships in WW2 history, employed the tactic of "getting ur T crossed by the enemy" or when in written history was that a good thing?
  9. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    How can i check the server stats?^^ And if u call what i say "false rumours" what is false in that being my opinion so far? If u disagree its fine by me and think what u may, but il think what i may on the other side. Those are some big "IFs" mate, now please tell me, what BB turns his guns and fires on the first spotted DD? Cause i see none, i see even cruisers too afraid to try and seek out DDs and just engage them whenever they are busy fighting something else, most cruisers i see in games focus BBs first, cruisers and DDs second, because as stated by Kartoffelmos, BBs are a floating sack of exp/credits so everyone just focuses them, easier to hit, and more gains from doing so or at least thats what it looks like.
  10. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    At what ranges dose that happen? Are those things BBs were not supposed to have in the first place?Lots of health, again were they not supposed to have it? Tell that to the bismarck getting trampled by a whole squadron, tell it to the scharnhorst, again, getting trampled by whole squadron, so imho they are supposed to have what they already do and then some Its actually a NC but what ever u say sir. And how likely is that salvo to happen if u play the DD right i wonder?
  11. Admiral__Chy

    Will BBs ever get justice?

    So i am wondering, will BBs ever get justice in this game? From my point of view the BBs are unjustly broken in terms of balance in comparison with other classes, and this becomes more obvious as u go up the tiers, il being with the begining, why are other classes significantly cheaper to repair post battle than a battleship considering the game is "balanced" betwen classes, why is the BB a luxury while a DD of the same tier for example costs nearly half compared to a BB while it can inflict significantly more dmg due to the infinite supply of torps they get? Why do cruisers suffer 0 dispersion problems at ranges like 15+ km where BBs should be engaging considering the lower weight shells are more subjected to winds? Why is the HE dmg so [edited] high, considering the real life example of durability given by the Bismarck while her whole superstructure was lit up like a christmas tree and yet she still fired whatever guns she still had working? This whole cruiser mechanic allows a good cruiser captain to litteraly OWN BBs at long ranges by simply zig zaging and returning HE fire on the BB untill its lit aflame and slowly dies from the fire, cause the cruiser can return 3-4 salvos for each of the BBs salvos, the BB can only deal significant dmg if it citadels, something thats veeeery unlikely to happen if the cruiser captain knows what hes doing and dosent show his broadside, and considering the dispersions we have, compared to the size of the cruiser, the chance of a citadel at 16-17 km ranges on a zig zaging cruiser is what, close to 0.01%? While in turn the chance for the cruiser to lit the BB on fire is what %? Per shell, considering the cruiser has 12 guns, eg Cleveland, fires 3-4 salvos for every BB salvo, thats what, lets say 36 shells with laser guided accuracy for every BB salvo, which has more chances to fall all around the cruiser and just splash the water rather than actually hit it, people say BBs are supposed to engage at long range, how can that even happen whilst a good cruiser captain can do 2 turns and a pirouette untill the shells get to him in the first place and then just splash all around him. I could understand cruisers to be able to fire at thease current ranges, but with a significant shoot dispersion, to encourage them to engage at shorter ranges, rather than employ "hit & run" tactics which in a 1 v 1 situation almost assures them victory, range increase for cruisers going up on the tree is alot more significant due to the pinpoint accuracy they carry than range increase for BBs, which can bearly even scratch the paint on anything as big as a BB at ranges over 16km. Why do DDs have invisibility technology they dont even have in modern times? I mean, it requires u to get in what, 6-7 km range of a DD to spot him and be able to effectively fire on it, getting to that range of a DD in a BB is already as close to suiciding as it can be, but if the DD pops the smoke screen, hes invisible even at those [edited] close ranges, has Wargaming not herd of something called RADAR? Isnt the smoke screen supposed to cover them at long ranges to enable them to close in? Why dose it work even at "melee" ranges where every piece of junk radars would be able to detect them anyway? Why are torpedoes so spamable and whitout an ammo limit whilst IRL there are very few DDs who could reload torpedoes in combat conditions? Not counting CVs since they were the ones who put a stop to the BB supremacy thus they deserve to be heavy hitters although i find the range on AA guns very very limited. So, DDs got alien stealth technology, cruisers got laser guided shells that defy physics, what do BBs have?
  12. Admiral__Chy

    End of the Year In-game Competition Submission Thread

    My best so far. PS to qualify for the event, we need to have a single post, as in, if i get a better battle do i need to edit this post and switch the screenshots or make a new post?
×