Elenortirion

you really got a feel like I would not know such basic things?

last hitting, happens from time to time

I'd say the ones you survived are in the bow [possibly aft] there is nearly no rng in torpedo damage mechanics.... the only rng that even remotely affects trops is their distribution within the spread and chance for detonation if it hits under the turret as for detroyers - as logn as floodign won't finish you off you can take as many torps into bow section as you like and still be somewhat afloat - being deleted o next spotting by a fart in your overal direstion is different thing

as a DD being hit by enougth shells to score 70 detonations in such frame of time with all the tools at hand to prevent/lower a chance for detonation - yes it is "doing something wrong" aaaand you couldn't be further from truth, and I find myself more often than not being only guy in a team with any balls just look up my survivability ratio in fubuki, kagero actually any DD, and that will tell you alot on how often I find myself under fire and yet the number of total detonations scored on my is single digit number after few seasons of rankeds you'll get a lifetime worth of those - especially with new containers giving out alot of flags as well

I don't think hardcap on MM here would solve the problem and I think that WG have done a much better job on explaining why they don't want to do such things, that I'll be ever able to explain why I agree with their points on that cruisers are already afaik alot cheaper to run and that does not help much when you are erased from the game by battleships - heck I even had a friend actually quitting WoWs because of random Battleships erasing him in one salvo from the other end of the map [he barely got to T5 with russian cruisers] the only real fix to to this situation is to bring up other classes [mostly cruisers and CVs, although some DDs could need a touch as well] to have an interesting and meaningfull role that does not require you to paranoically expect battleships firing on you from every possible angle then the community will do all the rest of work but knowing WG from other similar situations - either they will do nothing and pretend there is not real issue or they will just try to nerf BBs just as they "fixed" issue of high tier torp spammers....

reading throught wishes of some other people I've got a crazy idea healing consumable for IJN DDs from t8 upward!

I agree with admiral_noodle here - althought one cannot deny that average BB per match number is kinda tad bit to big for the moment being and when that comes fro ma guy who not so logn time ago said that he does not think that numbers of bb players affect him that much because it means alota of targets for torpedoes, you know something is not right

well believe me it will come - eventually - and if you knwo the meaning of the word "eventually" you'd also by now realise that I do not believe in it happening in any foreseeable future..... which does not change the fact that "it's official it will never come" is bs and spreading misinformation in light of most recent Q&A's sessions

this post shows you have no idea on how propabilities works lemme break it down to you each shell that hit your ship/specific area of your ship depending on which theory is actually true has an rng roll on detonation the more hits you land, the more rolls you receive, the bigger overal chances you have to trigger detonations and if you really have 70+ detonations in destroyer then I'd say you are doing something wrong with them PS. as historical destroyer sinking actuall magazine detonations were much more common reason of ship destruction that you make it sound - especially when dive bomber managed to put a bomb somewhere around area where torpedoes were magazined pure speculation with nothign more than anecdotal "evidence" to put behind it PS. if you burn those anti detonation flags to fast there is always that magazine modification which lowers the chance by 70% if you really meet those detonations so often [which I doubt to be honest]

ok once I have realised that the links have space to be removed instead of blindly copy-pasting it worked for me have you removed space after "d" in the adresses after copying them?

which I have realised today really: so WG wants IJN players to stop spam those long range torpedoes and start takign risk etc etc? so maybe, isntead of beggining it with removal of long range variants, they should stop telling players that this: is better torpedo than this: for these who looks on the screenshots and wonders what I am blabberign about - this kagerou has fitted her stock 10km torpedoes, and apparently 20 km ones are so much better that fittign them would jump torpedo rating by whole 8 points, while fitting type f3 would actually decrease said rating, ladies, and gentlemen - I hope I do not need to explain to you which choice of kagerou torps is better - but there are epople out there who totally got to T10 without realising that much what is important value of the torpedo - and if torpedo rating takes apaprently ONLY range into calculations here, then such a person could think that longer range == better so how about starting with changing torpedo ratings to take into consideration also things like - speed, damage, reload, instead of raw range please?

yeah I have rechecked things and shima does not have 10km variant but has 12km instead at the point of writing my response I thought shima has 15km long range isntead of 20 which with torp accel would be sorta 13ish [1] kagerou has no 12km torps [these are type 93 mod 3 while kagerou has only mod 2 and mod 1] and I meant 20km ones with torp accell being ok-eish, 10km with torp accell are not much different than type f3 don't worry I have assumed at first that shima has same torpedo choices as kagerou hence I was really surprised on what do you mean by "12km torps" so I recalled somewhere existance o IJN 15km torps long time ago so I thought shima long range variant is 15km and alot of misunderstanding has followed

haven't played battlestations but afaik in both NavyField games you have manuall control over every single gun on a ship [and tertiary batteries are quite normal thing for battleships in NF2] and the most fun thing is that in NF2 I have seen waaaay to many BB players forgettign that they have those secondary and tertiary batteries, waiting all those precious seconds between main battery reloads while I was pewpewing them down

well good to know that such a thing is even a thing.... how do you trigger that?

well currently when BBs as seen whining they are whining on fires [although it seems to not be as often as other players whining on overpopulation of BBs] in the past alot of BB players were whining about overpopulation of DDs on high tiers and what WG did? nerfstomped torpedo DDs in most ridiculous way because to fight long range torp spammer they have delivered mechanic that punishes everyone who is not long range spamming. so WG have took seriously BB whining in the past so I don't really see much of reason why shouldn't they take seriously whining of other class players, especially considerign that current situation is pure effect of WG takign seriously BB players whining in the past instead of taking seriously people who were discussing better solutions to the "problem"

and this is what I find so funny currently on my kagerou - NO ONE expects second salvo from me after 30 seconds from the previous one [there was one reason why I stopped to use torp reload booster at some point and it was because I've found myself throwing out so many torps that it was hurting my income - since I've got myself permacamo no longer the case ^-^] so one of funnier situations today: new orlean after leaving "well aimed" line of fire of my torps makes massive change in it's course turning back into them enemy fletcher who have smoked up little bit further seeing new orlean beign blown to pieces with my torps felt safe and started blazing up on a cruiser approaching...... and got hit by another torpedo salvo of mine ^-^ and I have more of these kinds of stories - all because no one expects the most stealthy ship in high tiers to drop smoke screen for torpedo reload consumable

hows that different to diana? O.o you don't realise what term "immediate future" means do you? also in last faq they touched the topic they said unified gold will come eventually - just not anytime soon so yeah keep spreading misinformation and stuff as for topic..... anything really as long as it's IJN, premium and decent [need dem moar training ships!]

10 you get 10 anti-detonation flag per each 24h period after being detonated also rankeds whenever happens are spamming them at you

both links turns 403 error for me :/

that ain't BB! jokes aside turning radius is for top speed [considering different top speeds for those BBs in mention listing turn radius only can be misleading] and it is not only thing that matters for maneuverability in order to dodge torpedoes - rudder shift time is another important thing - for example my friend in yamato do not believe me that he could dodge kagerou stock torps easilly and his main argument for it is 11sec of rudder shift time then again I cannot objectively say if they are op or not as I am way too often in very irritable situation of receiving end, and tbh personally I'd totally remove hydroacustic search from all KM BBs - would it be more balanced this way? I don't know, but personally I'd totally do it

12km as long range ones with torp accel? well one thing for sure is that rating when being calculated should take into consideration all stats not only range - for example said long range torp by themselves rarely can hit anything but becomes decent with torp acceleration skill - yet equipping this skill decrease your torpedo rating by one point - tbh it should either not change it or depending on how much range torpedo has and how fast it is maybe even increase it type F3 while having lower range are much faster and have smaller reload with comparable [if not better] damage per torpedo - if anything rating should be better than torp acceleld 10km long lance, and same as torp accelled long range variant

welp with torpedo acceleration skill the 10km type 93 are not much worse than type f3 and considering I already like the ship as it is now, downtiering without any other changes is effectively a buff [just as the have "nerfed" blyskawica by increasing the tier] [does yuguumo keep the concealment level? I mean - does it go with all upgrades to 5.4km sea detectability?] the only thing I find clearly inferior in kagero when compared to fubuki is lack of dp guns, sure torpedo layout [2 quadruple vs 3 triple] is arguable thing but I'd not say that kagerou is worse than fubuki [it's just minekaze->mutsuki step again basically and tbh I like mutsuki alot ] and yeah it tells alot about how ship fares against other in it's tiers when WG do not feel like specially nerfing a ship on downtier and I have even heard something about slight rof buff for kagero on downtiering?

more like "bigger ship == more space for proper torpedo buldges" as if I recall corectly more steel was not really good way of making torpedo protection - but I aggree here with you for ones that be it historically or gameplay-wisely BBs are the ones who deserves those good torpedo buldges most

I wish I could sell those camos from credit box xD

tap 1 - main battery HE shell tap 2 - main battery AP shell tap 3 - secondary battery-whatever shell it uses tertiary and forth batteries being kept as automatic when applicable for ships without torps this should work well within all bounds of functionalities already being set in the game depending on the engine limitations more numerical buttons could be used for more shell types and more batterries to be manually controlled doable? probably is WG willing to spend resources on it? for the moment being it seems not