Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


About lankylad11_lankylad

Recent Profile Visitors

289 profile views
  1. Midway vs. Hakuryu

    136 was what it actually had in real life when it left the drydock on launch day and since it actually existed unlike the Hakuryu, I feel it should have kept that. The Midway wasn't over performing
  2. Midway vs. Hakuryu

    But if you were going to reduce the hangar, they should have upped the tier of some of the planes
  3. The CV Captains Cabin

    having seen the patch notes, they are going to have to push the Midway's torpedo bombers and fighters up one tier. Midway and Hakuryu now have the same number of torpedo bombers so it isn't fair that Midway's are two tiers lower
  4. The CV Captains Cabin

    I haven't heard them say anything about compensating the midway for this ridiculous and unnecessary nerf. Whats the point in doubling the displacement of your aircraft carrier if you can't get better torpedo bombers, or any more reserves. I just said that if they are going to hammer it by taking away hangar capacity, they should buff it somewhere else in return
  5. The CV Captains Cabin

    of course not no, but the reason it had the nerfed aircraft and the long servicing time was the hangar. so if you take the hangar away then we need the others back. As I said, I won't be sailing a tier 10 CV till they are easier to play but it will be the Hakuryu unless they have readjusted it by then. Is there even any point in going up into the midway if your TB's melt anyway now? Since squadrons to hangar gives Essex more reserves on a ship half the size #WGlogic
  6. The CV Captains Cabin

    if they are going to do that to the hangar, they should return all aircraft to tier 10 and cut the servicing time of the aircraft by a third
  7. ST Midway huge hangar capacity nerf criticised

    personally I wouldn't be nerfing any tier 10 aircraft carriers since the stated goal of wargaming has been to make carriers more popular. the way to do that isn't to brutally kill one carrier line stone dead with the other much harder to play
  8. Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"

    Well I agree and I would say that all BBs should have raised citadels but they don't need to nerf any more tier 10 CVs
  9. Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"

    The way to deal with BB overpopulation isn't to nerf tier 10 aircraft carriers. Conqueror is in much more need of a nerf than any aircraft carrier. I would suggest taking the 4 X 3 setup away
  10. ST Midway huge hangar capacity nerf criticised

    So why is a nerf to Midway needed?
  11. The CV Captains Cabin

    The Facebook page hints about a hangar drop from 136 to 96 which is ridiculous
  12. Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"

    But if they are so concerned about a US T10 CV with that hangar let's have jets back with the lower hangar or even the Forrestal
  13. Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"

    I don't mind them removing a TB and returning all plane to T X and keeping the 136 hangar
  14. The CV Captains Cabin

    I REALLY hope they don't do that to Midway's hangar as an isolated change. Midway is historically accurate with the present hangar and has lots of disadvantages compared to Hakuryu, this just makes them balanced. Please do not do this wargaming!
  15. Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"

    Why does wargaming hate USN CVs? If they are going to do that to Midway they need to: A) Cut servicing times by a third (at least) B) give her stronger torpedo bombers Otherwise everyone will just play Hakuryu. Midway actually existed and with the planes in game she had a hangar capacity over 120 so we'll take this lower capacity if she gets an angled deck and jets back. There is literally no point to the Midway if they do this