159Hunter

14 torp hits on 5 targets but only 2 pings were used for that. Yeah, good luck finding and stopping you if you play like that.

When I started playing over half a decade ago with @46khz we had vivid discussions on a lot of stuff. Choice of ammo to name but one. Should we fire HE at long range and AP at short range? HE at BB and AP at CA? And what about DD? We knew nothing and that had nothing to do with a lack of skill. We just didn't understand the basic mechanics of the game. Gradually we found out about them because we wanted to get a firm grasp of them. Slowly we improved. Every player goes through that, because WG is terrible at explaining that stuff in game. Luckily a lot more information is available now compared to when we started playing. All this to say one thing: no new player is 'less skilled'. He is just new and getting acquainted to the game. How he goes about this will determine if he's potato material or a player who isn't a liability to his team. Yes. WG made terrible choices, overall however the balance in this game is quite all right. Why else would I still be playing...

Firstly, the person I quoted generalised. So I'll happily do the same. Secondyl, surely introducing reworked CVs or SUBs absolves the playerbase from playing properly...

Your analogy doesn't really match this though. WG isn't responsible for the quality of the posts, however the degrading of the game's quality can most certainlybe blamed to the playerbase. Most notably its unwillingness to learn the basic mechanics and play the objectives to name just two.

So besides not knowing how to properly play subs you also fail to grasp your own post? Yeah, you are the type of customer WG is looking for.

All of these points are mainly controlled by the sub player. Thus if they pose a problem it's, as you so eloquently stated, a problem located between the keyboard and the chair. Objectively your stats differ with this statement. But then again, the 'problems' you cited are a player problem and not a class problem.

Quality of forum drops thus WG staff is less inclined to post a lot.

Yamato secondary build is as good as Schlieffen sniper build: a horrible way to abuse the strengths and weaknesses of the ship.

I missed that communication

Show us replays please.

Yes and the main skill in WoWs to gitgud is reading the flow of the game and positioning your ship accordingly.

Except it isn't evidence. You posting fallacy doesn't change that fact. Post those statistics Your claim was that people have no problem with subs or else they'd be on the forums. and as such we are whining children. Now I see people complaining about subs, in game. Yet I do not see all of them on theseforums Fallacy No that was 't your claim . Fallacy See above No it isn't So only an exodus can be a sign of bad game design? Good to know you're not a game designer then. Dude. You made several claims, I agreed to all but one. One you cannot proof and posting fallacy all the time won't change this cause the causality isn't proven. Do that and that point stands as well. But that won't happen. So hf fun posting your walls of text.

You say this and then come up with this gem below. Really, pot ... kettle... Demonstrate the causality between those two variables. Without this you have no proof. For starters: you encountered about 250 - 300 k players, over 10 years. And we all know subs haven't been in game that long so the number of players you encountered when subs were in game is not 'hundreds of thousands'. I also met you in game and you never asked all players to voice their opinion, a result you wrote down afterwards I'm sure? So: you have no data set yourself. Ergo: demonstrate the causality. But by all means, let's assume there is no players leaving right? All those new accounts I encounter are not part of the normal influx and outflux of a playerbase who get tired of a game / want to try another game. Neither you nor I know why they leave, but I'm not the one making 'bold' statements, you are...

Let's try it this way: For 24 hours ( I forego downtime) the population is 10000 ( lower than max on graph, but call it an average). Now suppose every players plays 4 games with an average of 15 minutes. This means that every player plays 1 hour. As such you will have 24 X 10000 = 240000 unique players that day. Or suppose every player plays 8 games of 15 minutes. We are now at 12 X 10000 = 120000 unique players. So you see, the number of unique players can be significantly higher and is certainly higher than the max number of players. This graph doesn't allow you to determine the exact amount really but over 100000 is most certainly in the realm of possibilities.

You cannot know how hundreds of thousands of players feel about submarines. Fact

Well, you never heard of "spechiul" rng pack?

They it's your own "fault" that you got this mm. The moment a second CV came in queue the match was formed with those available for your tier. In this case: 0 others.

That is indeed the only way Russian make stuff, copy pasta and smack their own ugly red on it...

I'll bite What is the best type of Midway planes to solve the DD problem? What is overall the best type of planes on Midway? How would you skill your 21 point captain?

Why do you care? Play your Soviet ships like the good communist you are. Playing capitalists' pig ship is not a sign of being a good Russian.

Did you sit in queue for minutes on end or did you go straight into battle?

Show us the detailed stats screen plz. Also, a mere two torp hits with Benham is not even close to "doing your part plenty"

DMG is from the Bayern I reckon and missing HE from a fort ( it hit me a few times and got a fire).

Played an OP today, the battle report seems to be broken: - total amount of shells is missing one AP ( a citadel on me ) from the Bayern (see total of PD = 3 but only 2 show up ) - also missing the forts, but I can't remember if this was always the case?

The only change we need is the playerbase's mentality: they just need to put "some" effort into learning the basics. This alone will drastically improve game quality.