159Hunter

Because median WR is 48%. He is below that. As for better than 55%: yes it's possible. But its a small group of people of the playerbase that get there ( with the usual solo and not only playing tier I or enterprise constraints that is )

You forgot the option: I disagree with WG's gaming decisions and as a result keep my wallet closed. Though I fear people already forgot their rants and are ready to pay up again.

They generally didn't hold a gun whilst holding said rank. They did however progress through the ranks and showed that they were better than their peers. In order for a general to be proficiant he needs to understand the low level tactics in play. If he doesn't understand the strengths and weaknesses of the units he commands, he will never be succesfull. So no, you are kidding yourself if you see yourself as a commander. You are in the lower 50% bracket of the players. So you clearly need to learn more about strengths and weaknesses of all ships before trying to command others. I suggest you stop doing that and focus solely on your own gameplay. This will help you improve faster. Why you ask? Trying to do multiple things at once is neigh impossible. Doing them whilst lacking the proper background is a recipy for disaster.

Well, by making the widely available. If not considered differently from their non-hybrid counterparts, you will be matching fundametally different ships together. But for now I think we can agree that their mm needs special attention. @djmx1995 unfortunately people have asked WG to add such ships

Clearly WG trolling me. Will need to test this a bit more :)

So you at least consider them as hybrids and not as CA / BB?

Weeb camos ofc

I would like WG to share the results of their questionaires with the community. All current dev choices make me feel as if we the forumites and most CCs are out of touch with the broader playerbase. So please show us the results and then we could understand why you make certain choices.

They most certainly read these forums. Unfortunately they have a habiit of only popping up in useless topics. WG has this strange cherrypicking method when it comes to responding to the forums. Same as they do on any other medium: only respond to topics that fit their narrative and ignore the rest (even though they will say: "we read everything and take everything into consideration", I have yet to see a proof of this. Hence I've asked after multiple big changes that WG provide us with the points they gathered from player feedback and passed along to the devs. Never got an answer so I'll just assume they don't have this ).

Well, in the past WG needed those good players to explain how to play the game. Now they have the likes of NoZoup for that, so good players are no longer needed.

I quite like the Z-52 one for some bizarre reason. Guess it synergizes well with how I play that ship.

I agree, we shouldn't have DDs with stronger AA than cruisers. So bring back specialized cruisers as we knew thel before CE rework. When that happens you can normalize Halland AA levels.

Now you are moving goalposts. Let me refresh your memory on your definition of OP: Which you clarified with the following: Keywords in the above: Anyone Any other ship So I give you 3 players who do worse in Enterprise than in a other ships. So Enterprise is not OP as per your definition. Unless ofc you want to call the likes of Amagi and Neptune OP ( just a few ships outperforming Enty in my short player sweep).

So according to your definition Enterprise is not OP:

According to your definition of OP no ship can ever be OP. As there will always be someone who will be utterly useless in it. So I'd change anyone to something else.

I second this honorable request

Dear @MrConway , @Crysantos @Tuccy, This is just one more classical example of a player who starts playing a game without ANY DECENT IN GAME TUTORIAL. I wonder how many more players are out there that: a) keep on playing, not understanding and quit in frustration; b) or, keep playing and make gamese misarable for other people by virtue of not understanding even the most basic game mechanics. When will you people finally make an in game tutorial that explains game mechanics? No, not talking about your videos. But an actual, fully scripted tutorial that lets a person feel all these mechanics and explains them. Seriously, why is WG so stubborn about this? Any decent game has a basic tutorial. Yet WG thinks: naa, they all wrong bruh. We be right. :insert epic facepalm x 1000: To OP: So you found the game forum. Congratulations, I fear a lot of people in your situation don't even make it this far. Too bad you showed the wrong attitude. This forum can be both hostile and very helpfull. All of this usually depends on the attitude of the OP. In your case, you failed. Pro (WoWs forum) tip: would you react in real life as you reacted here? If the answer is yes: you're doing it wrong and will collect hate tokens. If the answer is no: then why do it?

Sorry, but you brought the stress/burnout on yourself. Nobody forces you to rank 1 every week. That's your own doing. If you don't like the concept, don't play. That being said, WG announced a few changes after this test season. Maybe these will be to your liking.

This: And I guess they get guns and no citadel. So there's that.

Source? Do tell, how many complaints are we talking? @OP, don't worry. It's a German ship. WG will most likely tone it down for that. On the other hand it is a CV. Hmm, tricky balance here for WG.

I don't understand this comment, her scoring method is pretty clear from the get go. It isn't all about performace, gamplay and concept of skills are taken into account as well. How anyone can think that this is just an objective review is beyond me. For that, look at Flamu's review I guess... or NoZoup if you like the sugarcoated version :)

Oh, so people focussing down the ultimate sniper BB with bad armor is hate? You do realise you are playing a naval battle simulation and not a fishing simulator? Yes, those intellectual inferiors that noticed you STILL HAVE NOT PLAYED THIS SHIP. Clearly very dumb indeed to make such a remark...

Somehow I get the feeling that @GarrusBrutus doesn't like this new feature TM WG 2021

Too bad Flamu's vid came out this weekend. It's on par with LWM except for AR ( a Flamu top pick and not do much for LWM ) all other differences between both are less important

Moar diverse builds confirmed (c) WG 2021