159Hunter

Why the turning speed on Smolensk guns? Their turning rate is amazing anyways? Aren't you better off saving it for something else? Maybe take out a 2 pointer and add another 3 pointer?

WG says they want diverse builds. Your solution here is how to make that happen. Sadly WG developpers don't have your common sense and couldn't come up with this. That's why once again, builds are not diverse. You still want the same basic builds and very little flavour is left. Simple cause some skills are too good not to use. If every skill would have positive traits AND drawbacks you could get more diverse builds. But that would require: - a REAL overhaul, not some small sideline changes - a playerbase that could handle such skills Neither will ever happen: - big overhaul is too expensive - playerbase is... well ... the playerbase...

Yes, just overwhelm them CV at the start of the game. And afterwards you can continue picking off whichever ship you want. Honestly, this ship is so special it shouldn't even be allowed in a division. Tone with 2 gunboat DDs: very easy DD hunting Tone with 2 BB: always spotting Tone with 2 agressive CA: no more pesky DD problem ....

If the new skill is good: option 1 If the new skill is ****: option 2

There is WG spreadsheet, the one I clearly marked as " spreadsheet (TM) ", which is, as you should know by now, a meme used to "explain" weird decisions taken by WG. There is no second one, I do not ask WG to justify themselves for bringing Tone: 1) it's theire game, they can do as they see fit; 2) It's futile as WG hardly ever explain their reasoning behind game(play) decisions. I will however ask players to justify bold claims as the ones you made. It's not because WG is sketchy that players should drop down to WG's level. So I asked you to back up your claim, you can't and you don't feel like doing so. All it shows is that you are equally dishonest as WG. PS: you base your opinion on the forums, as of that is the only source where this game is discussed. Or the the only way people ocmmunicate with WG...

See, now this is where spreadsheet comes in. You claim to know minority / majority. But you can't back this up. WG can with their spreadsheet (TM)

In be4 sticky topic: show us how many people have blocked you

Not the same though, people have been asking these ships. So WG will hide behind that request. It's not the same as saying "we don't give a ****". It's a subtle nuance, but it is one none the less.

Has been a years long player request. WG just ignores it. They don't want (or need) knowledgeable players. They just want players that spend money on the game. Currently people keep spending enough money, so why should they produce free content when they can also produce content that earns them hard cash?

That's not what spreadsheet (TM) says...

Same players on forum have been asking for Tone and Ise for years. Maybe a bit less since CV rework, but it is an old player request.

The glorious Soviet Navy is reduced to it's rightful place in WW2 naval history: a sidestory. Only three ships made the lineup and one of those is MK (you know that 1950's cruiser that defeated the Germans on multiple occasions...). I mean, the Italians made the lineup with 3. And they don't even have that many premiums or a DD line. But glorious Soviet navy is still underrepresented in game as far as WG is concerned. I will send myself to Gulag now. Btw: interesting idea, would like to try it out ( the mode, not gulag)

Or he could avoid dropping the DDs from bow or stern and just drop from the side. Then just dodge isn't there.

a bit too much memes and stuff for my liking.

It took me 17 games to get this goal. Then I contemplated making a run for rank 1 (rewards). I quickly stopped that train of thought when I then saw multiple players with 100+ games also at rank 4. Nope, not worth my time. I got what I came for, next week: same thing, playing to get my steel and doubloons.

Did I get it right @Excavatus? Cause it seems the master used another picture than the one you last provided me:

Both of you are wrong. Why on earth bring (and pay for) 3 of them? Just bring a real CV as third player. Free and equal amount of fun ensured :)

Are you calling my USSR Electronika BK old? It is top notch computing machine. Now go to gulag you.

Already had a discusison with a WG employee about this. The tone (see what I did there :) ) of that dialogue was: - They know just adding it as a cruiser in MM is not optimal, HOWEVER: - They are not willing to match them 1 on 1 (as there might not be enough to go for this type of MM);

If the most succesfull battle you can show is you being third... Don't get me wrong. I am cheering for you to make it into silver. One less issue for me next bronze week.

So wins are your skill alone and losses are the MM... right...

Now I see the mission, you complain about a mission that gives you two flags? You don't even need to complete this one to finish stage 2 of the Italian missions...

I was about to agree with you, but then I looked at all the players I saw today. I now disagree with you, he fits right in, we are the odd ducklings...

If they were truly serious about that, they'd remove free premium consumables. That's a real drain :)

Honestly, ranked is chill for me cause I don't care about reaching rank 1. I just play for the wins to get the steel and doubloons.