159Hunter

You people really need to start explaining what is wrong with the MM. Just posting a screenshot of a lost battle is meaningless.

I can confirm you are doing something wrong. Before capt rework I never played that ship with range upgrade in 6th slot (netting around 16km range) and I did all right. The lack of range never bothered me. Heck, I even play that ship without concealment expert.

Is this the same day you will finally balance CV ineraction with other classes ?

Very easy : players complained about CVs and WG magically had enough data to prove it was needed ( in this case: sales of premium CVs were too low). As to when we might expect balanced CVs: WG still needs more data cause the amount of CVs is still not high (but sales are okay now ).

Simple answer: when WG has collected enough data to ascertain that there is indeed a problem with said skills.

Pay implies that retraining costs money. It can be done by using an in game currency that is obtained just by playing the game. So in that sense you don't have to pay to retrain. If your interpretation of pay is: it costs free in game resources. Well, then you are correct.

Anything that allows me to skip tier 3 - 5 gameplay: I'll take it. Anything more is just a plus.

Sorry, should have been more clear. You need to ask him on twitter. Btw, will Flamu be the new Makarov on this week's stream?

... twitter .... Just saying

Nice try, but that's not what he wrote though. "He said that any other player acting like Flamu would have been banned by now." So we want to know: which banneable offense did Flamu commit? If none were commited: please moderate the post of your moderator to remove this false information.

That would mean that all potatoes rank out after one week. This leaves good players a potato free week to rank out as well. Can't have that. @op I read your rant quite well. You are blaming everything and everyone but yourself.

If you want a respons from WG: just post this on twitter

These "safe ranks" should not exist AT ALL. That is the only way to players at their skill level. If every rank were a "safe rank" everyone could just farm their way to the next league. No thx. Probably WG estimating that they can make more money with rankes being only high tiers. tier 8 - 9 go well together. If you feel tier 8 is inferior, then just pick a tier 9... so a player who knows how to use his ship can't have more influence on the game? Having good players is already a rare sight, and now you are saying they shouldn't be able to carry? Which unbalanced DDs are you talking about? One of the best DDs at this level is the Jutland. I love the Lightning as well. Both are, imo, the best DDs at these tiers. Missouri and Iowa are equal, yes the former has radar but you have to be an absolute donkey to get caught by that radar. Musashi is special, just HE spam it / send a CV on it and it melts. So all ships are overrated? And because you have no fun you only played over 150 ranked battles in the last two weeks? Strange way to show you don't like them... May I suggest that you take a deep look at your statistics... you are far below even the averga player. So in fact: you drag your teams down... WG will not do this cause it messes with their income. tier 8 OK? Sure man... Smolensk destroying games? It's an annoying ship, if the team does not want to play ball, the Smolensk is useless. No you have a look at your stats and see why you don't make it through

Yes, bias. You don't like his content (which is ok), but stating that wheter he did a lot for the game is 'questionable' to you, is your bias speaking. You know who adds even more toxicity? WG and their CV rework ( the ultimate griefing class ). WG and their continuus refusal to educate their players ( p*** poor quality of players leads to p*** poor quality of matches ) WG making economy too forgiving ( so everyone can just keep playing high tier games like a donkey, leading to p*** poor matches ).

Nice bias there... He's a CC, ofc he did a lot for this game. How else would he make CC? Yes he makes money streaming. He never hid that. And that's bad how? @Muneris I guess you mean 'set an example' rather than 'be an idol'

As I said before in respons to @Bear__Necessities: NoZoup ofc. Btw, shame on you for giving WG your hard earned cash Bear...

Using 'I sank 3 ships' vs 'guy sank none' is, without further context, a useless statement. That being said: use the report button. And if you really think he/she crossed a line you can send a replay to one of the XG staff on these forums.

I hope you at least read the forum rules before moderating a post. Cause your knowledge about in game rules is zero. Well, NoZOup ofcourse. He's what WG is aiming for.

That is your line Games/Week that you didn't add for the Thunderer numbers

You are correct

Thx, one extra remark. You forgot to add the weekly battles for 2020, let me add them: Q1/2020 - 35701 Q2/2020 - 33180 Q3/2020 - 42290 Q4/2020 - 52465 So there clearly is a surge in Q3 and Q4. I can't explain the former, the latter is easily explained by this: This surge continued, with two contributing factors (imo): - the forementioned devblog; - people actually saw how well the Thunderer benefitted from Dead Eye (and how easy the playstyle is); But as with any novelty; values drop to normal. We see this every time a new ship is introduced: it is played a lot, but after a while numbers drop to normal and other ships pick up the slack. So for me, Thunderer values are nominal.

Now do the same for thunderers

Even range mod will not give you the range of most BBs. And by sitting with them you are in open water, so you will still get focussed over the BBs. Better to get in somewhat closer where you can shield a flank with an island and control who can shoot at you...

And why is that?