Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

159Hunter

Players
  • Content Сount

    4,528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [NWP]

Everything posted by 159Hunter

  1. 159Hunter

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Not to alarm you, but WG feels that, for the potential axis vs allies battles, the fact that one side has no radar is not a substantial downside. So I wouldn't hold your breath for this. Sorry, but I hardly encounter afk ppl. What WG could do is punish afk'rs more severly (as in: ban way faster/ You do realize that people actively clicked a battle button 1 min prior to the start of a match. So you want all people to click again. Okay, how long do they have? Because this 1 min is for a lot of people I know the ideal moment to go grab a drink, feed the cat, grab a snack.... So all you do is delay the start of a match ( and what WG wants with their MM is to get people playing as fast as possible ). Would be nice if people would actually come up with detailed ideas and not throw one liners around.
  2. Why do you doubt this statement? There are people whos most played ships are the tier I. So it's most certainly possible that he's one of those 1000+ tier I games.
  3. 159Hunter

    The Issue of Balancing Premium Ships.

    So weird that when WG decided they wanted to balance Guilio Cesaro all hell broke loose. But now over 50% think it's ok. Good to now, now WG can move that ship to tier VI after all...
  4. 159Hunter

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    And how do you suppose they do that? What determines an afk player? Someone who doesn't move the first 10 sec, 30 sec, 60 sec? And then you bring in a new player, he needs to load in so another 30-60 sec lost and he spawns in the back with the game already ongoing for 1-2 min. So he's in a bad spot AND he has less chance to make XP. Sounds like a perfect solution...
  5. When you have to drag tier X across the finish line, special mention to my Gearing who has yet to learn what spotting means.
  6. 159Hunter

    Fix you game

    This is a player issue as well, as @nambr9 pointed out in his first post. It's hard the guess which side will give in first (players playing less BB - WG making BBs less comfortable to play). If this is really an issue for you: be part of the change and stop playing BB. Otherwise: why complain?
  7. 159Hunter

    The Issue of Balancing Premium Ships.

    I voted no. It's very easy: WG does testing, they should ensure the ships are properly balanced upon release. The only other balancing that should be alowed is when a global game change happens (as in captain rework, IFHE changes ... ) No individual nerfs for premiums ( I'm still unsure about freemiums).
  8. 159Hunter

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    But but but... My statshaming... How can I get chat bans in such a world?
  9. 159Hunter

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    And there is nothing MM can do about this. Purely a player issue.
  10. 159Hunter

    A simple question.

    Are you still trying to convince a forum [...] that certain ships are OP. You know, ships that WG pulled from the shop and said never to sell again because they were a bit too strong?
  11. 159Hunter

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    ''Can't beat them? Join them.'' And in this case WG made sure the players didn't even need to change classes.
  12. 159Hunter

    Is WG's strategy flawed, and actually hurting them?

    I stopped spending money in 2017. Hasn't stopped me from getting tons of new premiums.
  13. 159Hunter

    General CV related discussions.

    I failed, severely...
  14. 159Hunter

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Wrong. The goal is to create games with equal line ups between classes, divisions and tiers (thus not looking at individual players and ships) as fast as possible. You do realize that this is exactly the same statement as before, yet you see the two as contradictions. Cause you know, always creating 50/50 win games will move people to a 50% WR. PS: the median WR is 48% and has been for years. So even if your statements were true, WG is failing without compensating to achieve these 'goals'. Slightly? I call 5 % up and down more than slight. A difference of 5% in player skill is huge gameplay wise. Source please.
  15. No worries comrade. Napoli will be your cup of tea. SAP secondaries.
  16. 159Hunter

    ST 0.10.3, new ships

    So 3 ships stuffed with gimmicks. I like the prospect of new ships but why so gimmicky?
  17. 159Hunter

    no blame in quitting brawls

    The fact that you survived means he was bad. Just dodge doesn't work against competent CV players.
  18. 159Hunter

    no blame in quitting brawls

    To summarize, you played a match against an utter potato in a CV. Now come back when you meet a non deep red CV player.
  19. 159Hunter

    no blame in quitting brawls

    So it is all right that a CV doesn't need to move to win this mode. That he is immortal in this mode. God forbid he should move his hull to grab buffs himself. Or worse, face a ship that gets extra strength by moving his hull (whilst still being incapable of hurting his opponent) Seriously. Maybe you should play classes other than CV.
  20. 159Hunter

    Is auto bot farming still exist in this game?

    Send replay to MrConway and ask them to look into this player. Such toxic behaviour warrants a ban.
  21. You what??? How the f*** does that happen...
×