159Hunter

Maybe you guys should try to educate your players. With tutorials and stuff. Just an idea really. Cause, clearly, your current approach isn't working. And how is autism involved here?

Antwerp

And citadels might get lowered even further.

Why not just make the support ticket and find out? If that fails, use support ticket to make community staff to intervene. Also: your gf needs a punishment it seems

Yes, soon WG will release an orange forum version.

All very nice. I understand your feeling. It's frustrating. But it's a player issue thay cannot be solved by looking at WR or PR. Also @ForlornSailor has a great point: ppl should just stop using mmm at the start of a game. All it does is create an even more toxic environment. If you "need" this to see which players are good enough to support / who can support you: look at the opening positioning of those players. That tells you all you need to know about a player's skill.

I use this on my meme Cleveland build. Current camping meta + my agressive CL playstyle means that I can, once on a blue Monday, activate this skill

He's French, what did you expect

Well, for what it's worth: 1) WG is monitoring the situation and is making small incremental changes. A better approach than the sledgehammer. 2)Now if only they would tackle the real sources of the OP/UP ness of ships. But overall: 1 out of 2 is 50%, better than I expect WGto perform. Heck, it's far superior than the average player.

For starters: - these statistics will NEVER detect an occasional AFK, NEVER - someone who is afk often will have bad stats. Or maybe only because he/she doesn't like a certain matchup and in the other games he/she will perform good - there are potatoes who'd be more useful to their team if they were afk. And their stats reflect this. But there is no way to know this. I still believe most afk are of the occasional kind: someone ringing at the door, gf calling for help, baby crying ...

Unfortunately this is a design choice you cannot make 5 years into the game. The rework of all ships is just nigh impossible. Maybe if the introduce support CVs they could give them such an option. As they would be fundamentally different anyways. But doing so with current ships...

Pray god, do tell me how PR / WR / or any other statistic ... will tell the MM that he is dealing with an AFK player.

But yamato in tier VII is not broken retarded? A bit selective aren't you.

In this topic it has been explained over and over why WR based mm won't work. PR alone is a useless metric. @KHETTIFER please post the screens of all other matches please. You say you had 20% wr diffetence in all of them, statistically possible but very improbable. I still don't understand why everyone keeps insisting that one screenshot of a lost game shows rigged mm.

In a harbour far far away...

Another useless comment by a CV apologist

So what exactly are those "changes to parameters" for the Dutch ships?

Do you really believe that? It is WG after all.

As someone who has been banned frequently (yes glue eaters get under my skin) I never got banned for saying something polite. What you posted might have been your point but not how you expressed it.

Only WG knows this. Then again, the monetization when new lines were introduced happened gradually. So the new method must be generating enough money for them to go down this path.

They can't even perma ban Flamu.

Reading topic hard. Bery hard.

I So will you investigate how Customer Support messed this one up? Or does WG feel that this is normal behaviour and should not warrant an account ban? It's not like this is a one time occurance for this player. Or do your Customer Support agents only look at one ticket and never the global picture in such a case. I know they dont for chat bans, so why not for this type of behaviour?

@YabbaCoe care to pitch in here. Playing with this ***** is indeed deeply depressing. But WG seems to think this behaviour is up to standards...

Work in Progress So your guess is as good as mine how they will be implemented. Btw, monti and gk have been powercrept by all new BB as well. Same as Halland powercrept a lot of the older DD lines. Yeah nope. They are tanky supercruisers but their tanking or gun power is nowhere near that of a BB. Where they needed as they currently are? Nope. Same as RU BB were not needed in their current shape. But that is RU ships and WG and has nothing to do with CA and BB. Your generalization is laughable, dishonest and will only make bad BB players play worse after watching your content. But I guess you saw that's the way to create content. Same as Flamu always bi**** about WG. Then why are the queues and matches filled with BB and DD? This playerbase has a way of finding the strong ships and creating a meta. The CA overabundance isn't there. So they are percieved as less suitable than other classes. BB are relaxed and easy. Deadeye only reinforced that. Also meaning that a lot of cruisers don't even have the range anymore because most BB sit so far back. The few that do, have nothing left to do but HE spam. Nothing else you can do to a bow in BB at 20 km. DD are far more influential in deciding matches * than CA. Are CA underpowered: nope, they are just harder to play. Are BB powercrept by CA: hell no. * let's forget the abomibation they call CV CV You did indeed forget to mention that.