159Hunter

When will the PhD course "Understanding new AA mechanics" be organized? Seriously, why do you guys have to overcomplicate things? Plus, as far as I understand these proposed changes: RU CVs will not suffer any drawbacks?

Trippel Karmeliet :)

but but but ... that's not what our survey said

I don't doubt that, but it sure as heck isn't Duvel.

Poor choice of beer and complaining about ba MM you are contributing to yourself. You're really having a bad day...

Don't feed the troll.

Seriously @Seraphice, how dumb is WG's inactivity detector? BTW, OP, post here as well:

Why? I mean, right now we are sitting at 48% ish iirc. Artificially pushing that up to 50% won't change the fact that the biggest part of the player-base is bad. At least now you can clearly identify if, by artificially altering your bell curve you hide the abysmal state of the player-base, but it's still there.

On one and the same page. But now ofc it doesn't matter because, once again, your point was proven moot. You made such a false claim claim, I showed you your claim was wrong. And now you never said anything about how of a CV player he was? At least I make educational assumptions. You just release brainfarts. Nope, you have no data whatsoever on which you base your brainfarts. But the fact that you can't see that just shows we should actually forgive you. For you don't know any better. Poor sod.

You are trying to fight a behaviour with the wrong tools. These ppl really don't care if they save their star or if they lose. So taking the star away isn't going to stop such behaviour. The only thing that does alter such players is the use of (temporary) bans. And no, this isn't moving goalposts. It's using rules what they should be used for. Otherwise, poor DD that actually does try to play the game but gets killed after 2 min by a CV. He won't get enough XP, so tought luck?

That's the WR of a player for ALL his classes. That has nothing to do with their WR in CVs, some of them don't even PLAY CVs: - look fe at current #1633 (https://wows-numbers.com/player/589352235,Gremuuu/) -> NO CV games played - or look at current (also) #1633 (https://wows-numbers.com/player/587857576,AOUA_GLOUGLOU/) -> ONE CV game played - or #1415 (https://wows-numbers.com/player/572795338,dato7kato777/) -> NO CV games played Conclusion: your numbers are not what you claim they are. If you want to look at CV winrates on WoWs numbers you look at the individual ships: For Midway that would be: - https://wows-numbers.com/ship/4179605488,Midway/?order=win_rate__desc#leaderboard - a total of a little over 9000 players -> 2% of that is around 180 - so we're looking in this range: Second example: Implacable: - https://wows-numbers.com/ship/4181702608,Implacable/?order=win_rate__desc&p=1 - about 13500 players -> 2% of that is around 270 - which looks like: If you want lower 70%: go look up Shokaku for example. So no, your players' high 50 % numbers are not correct because you used the wrong data set. Again, pulling numbers out of your head I see. So now we're starting your classical ad You seem to miss the point, again. If you user numbers: be able to back them up. You can't, so your whole argument is rendered invalid. Something with ... kettle ... black ... English proverb?

Now do this for "all" WoWs streamers, on "all" channels (I mean, most don't even stream live on Youtube so ...). Hence my question to OP, cause his poll was pretty vague

Nope, it's a team effort: the entire team gets a star (and should be losing one if they lost). I mean, I can come up with rules as well: I had 500 xp more than the next player of my winning team, I carried these potatoes and as such they shouldn't get a star... Or maybe WG can actually finetune the XP earnings in such a way that they are not skewed towards damage farming ... Yes, the star system is not perfect, no overcomplicating it will not make it better.

Who cares, we can't discuss politics on these forums, so WG is saved :D

So, once again, demonstrate where you get these numbers. Cause a rough check I did on wows numbers for the top 2% CV players by WR per CV puts me in the high 60% low 70% WR. This guy isn't even close to that.

Erm, so what are you asking us here? - Are we still watching Flamu? - Do we feel Flamu is the most viewed streamer? - Do we have viewer counts of all WOWs streamers? ...

I don't need a data set, you came up with the number so the burden of proof is yours to carry. You use unfounded numbers to strengthen your case. Well, newsflash, all it does is derail it completely.

To hide the potential clusterf**** their rework of inactivity was. If they were really keen on gathering data they would have informed all players in game, WG is well aware that only a small part of the population visits the forums.

One thing I don't understand, but maybe you can explain me the deal about this "silent majority". We only have data from the Discord and Forum polls, and they are all vocally against CVs and Subs. Okay, they might not be a valid representation of the entire population, but it is a real data set none the less. On what data sets do the believers of the silent majority base their claims? Cause so far I've not seen a single data set confirm their hypothesis. All they have is the "belief" that we are all wrong and that they are right.

Well, let me know when you've identified the problem so I can safely return to operations without losing any boosters over it. As for replays: sorry, if you are too lazy to refund lost boosters, then I'm too lazy to look for replays on my HDD.

Great Ad Hominem btw You just pulled 2,5 out of your hat without providing any explanation nor a proper data set. So if you really want to discuss: explain how you got to 2,5

At least they didn't go for Google Bard

A statue is supposed to be a female representation? Two fictional characters? I mean, if you could have mentioned Dasha, she's a real person. But using these fictional things to say you are introducting female commanders is just meh

You clearly don't LOL, yes compare every big boat you encounter to a destroyer. You just keep on moving goalposts...

You mentioned stealth, now you are talking about real distances. One might call this moving goalposts. But I'll answer you anyways: I don't know these distances in RL and neither do you: - because neither of us fought in WWII - because we are not aware of the technical limitations of the big navies' modern radar systems and ships' radar cross sections.