159Hunter

Well, one solution would be to look at the tier of a division (aka the highest tier ship in that division) and artificially look at all ships from this division as being this highest tier. EG: CA 8 DD 8 CV 7 would be looked at by MM as : CA 8 DD 8 and CV 8. That way you willingly put your team at a disadvantage and not the enemy team.

Why must they find an equal division? They can always match the division's T5 ships with single T5 ships. So I don"t see how this turns it into a T7 game and not a tier 8

Year of CV confirmed Jokes aside, I hope it'll be a coherent line. Not one where you need to respec captains every two tiers cause, different style.

Sounds weird. So maybe your report isn't 100% accurate. Do you have a replay?

Erm. Nope. That's not how mirrored CV MM work(s)ed

Well, they could prolly limit the amount of CV per team to ONE at lower tiers as well. However, I'd like WG to finally complete the CV rework (soonTM) BEFORE adjusting anything else. All adjustments they do now will need to be rebalance afterwards when the CV rework comes out (soonTM)

Some people who grind to tier X sell all previous ships. So they are left with premiums.

I rate your trolling at 2/10 and refer to post #4.

So you only pick the one that suits you? Then explain why only your proposal and none of the others?

And as others pointed out. If YOU sit in smoke then you can't see other ships. So they should be visible as 'some green flickering'. Ships not spotted by you: the same Ships spotted by radar: the same Ships spotted by your plane: the same Is that what you want?

This game is no simulator. If you want realism you'll have to find another game.

If you were hoping for a good discussion with the community you should have written your opening statement differently. Right now it's a whining post. And this community generally doesn't respond well to those. So I think you should: 1) ask the mods to close this topic 2) calm down 3) rethink and rewrite a constructive topic

You know that the top tier CV players WILL use these builds in their divisions. That'll make them even stronger. They already do that today with mino / DM. And Worcester is even better at it. Thus making it even more difficult for a solo CV. Don't misunderstand me, us and strong aa is ok. But claiming these builds will be rare? The people that have them will play them only in cv divisions.

As per WOWs wiki (and own experience) I can say this is wrong, standard containers have a (slim) chance of dropping port slots. http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Container @EboyLarano you can deselect buying a port slot as marked below. If however, you have no free slots: sell ships or you'll have to buy some ( but tbh, this is a waste. As soon as you play more games you'll end up with more slots than you'll ever need. So just hang on for now) Thanks for asking this question in a civil way, don't mind the occasional troll here

Well, you are after all farming damage on BBs. Which generally yields the least buck per damagepoint.

But that is why, in their infinite wisdom, WG added floatplanes as well.

So they reworked it now, BEFORE the CV rework? They really like double work at WG as it's likely they'll have to redo it once the rework the CVs (soon TM)

I tried that approach. But he called it 'gossip' and 'b.s.' and he predicts 'to be proven right in a couple of months'.

Well, if you talk the same way in chat as you do on these forums.... let's just say I'm not surprised about your chatban.

In other news, Paris weather forecast predicts 17 degrees and showers this weekend. So all those planning to go there for a citytrip: reconsider.

I'll bite... You're wrong But you're right, I've managed to get myself stuck a few times on different maps and then it takes minutes to get out. It's usually when I end up parallel to an island.

What gossip is that? Sure, that's just one way of calling it. Still doesn't change that you go back to LOW tiers for it. If you're a half decent captain you use a tier 7 or 8 premium. Will go a lot faster if you knwo what you're doing. And the reason why you were bad at them (whilst you call them OP, go figure) is in bold. If that's all you do in them then you will be terrible in them. There's a lot more to do in say a Des Moines than sit parked behind an island the entire game. Lol, a DD has plenty of choices against a Z 23. The only one that scares me a bit is the Z 52 and Lo Yang, cause of their big hydro ranges. All other are just meh. Well, maybe because the other DD approaches the cap at a good angle, sheltering himself from incoming fire? Or the fact that he constantly dodges? And after a few attempts you get used to it and will hit him (BB, KM, IJN and RU cruisers, US is a bit more dodgy). Sure, the Zao is exactly the cruiser to use for close range DD support... Let me repeat it for you: Hypothesis by you: radar ships are OP and ruin my Shima games Stats show that you are bad at playing them, I deduce from this: 1) That you don't know how to properly position yourself ( as already mentioned above in the bolded part of text and as show by a 20% hitratio in your DM...) 2) Bad positioning leads to bad use of radar. 3) Bad use of radar leads to you misjudging radar capacities. 4) Because you misjudge those capacities you can't come up with a counterplay in your Shima. So maybe, just maybe, you should get of your high horse and try to learn how to use radar properly. Afterwards you'll find ways of dealing with them. But I'm pretty sure that, because my opinion does not equal yours, you'll call me god knows what and ignore it. Because YOU are the only one who is right, even though so many others are saying you aren't. Yep, what I thought. OP thinks that forums are made to acknowledge his opinion. They are not made to discuss and explain where he might be wrong and where he could improve.

But you don't mind to (try to) go clubbing in the Kamikaze R on low tiers... Maybe you should then play / buy some of those high tier OP ships. Also your US CA line stats show that, if they really as OP as you claim, you haven't managed to grasp their OPness. Yep, your stats on US CAs with radar reflect your skills in working as a radar cruiser. And, surprise surprise, because you don't know how to use it, I'm not surprised you don't know how to play against a radar ship. Hitting Khaba is easy, depending on the ship you're playing. But it all depends on the situation. This kind of general statement makes no sense.

So different is bad? Not really an explanation now is it? But then again, I doubt you can explain why... Yep, here we go. When asked to explain something you go ranting. Very mature.

But hey, if they are not OP, then what's the problem, why can't they be in the game? Also, GG on the namecalling.