tadaMonika
-
Content Сount
216 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
4726 -
Clan
[GULLY]
Everything posted by tadaMonika
-
*Edited
-
Yeah man sorry, I don't know how I could be so stupid. The Langley is just broken. Remove it from the game! (hey I can make bad trolling attempts, too) "we have to quote things from this very own thread, not even 2 hours ago"... " 5 hours ago, ForlornSailor " OHHHH busted, that is not even 4th grade math mate lul. Wait why I should be banned from CV overall discussions but be allowed to balance in the CV class discussions? Sounds like a fun idea. Well, you let it sound a little bit extreme with "the same amount of played matches in every ship", but if that is your idea... Welp you know, at least 50 matches for a wholce class would not kill anyone, but you might not think so^^ (But pshh, I also think that some carriers are too strong, but I am not naive enough to transfer that to a whole class of ships I never played a single battle with ;))
-
*Edited
- 195 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- underpowered
- carriers
- (and 16 more)
-
None of you have a singe CV game. Why should anyone take you serious lol. You do not have a point. Play carriers, get to tier 8 pr so and then you can make a point. Otherwise all I hear is just "mimimi", which , ofc is not a point to any sane person lol.
-
What should I admit? You do not even have a point lmao. Yeah you have better stats oh crap. 6200 games=1900 games in your world apparently xD But yeah, whatever. You are the one who is crying here, not me. I do not have a problem with any class in this game. 65% winrate and the 35% losses are against the big, bad carriers, huh? *Edited
-
*Edited As a BB main, I have no problem with CV's, but there is always someone like you, who just cannot play against a certain class of vehicles and therefore deem it overpowered *Edited If you do not have a point to make, just don't write at all. Will be a huge gain of time for everyone involved who still cares about your whining.
-
You seriously don't see that you fked yourself over with that statement? xD I mean if you want to focus on the (solo)winrate, here you go, buddy: https://eu.warships.today/vehicles Very strange... Not too many CVs to be found there. As for the players... You read my post, right? Someone with over 4k games on CVs will fk you most likely, because it is the only class that actually requires skill to play, other than positioning. If CV's are so overpowered, why not play them yourself? Your profile is private, so I guess you are either one salty BB main or a salty jap DD main (which would actually be relevant, bcs jap DD's are awful lol)
-
Oh crap, really? It's not like japanese CV's are like better or ssomething than the american ones in random battles. They can scout better and have the better strike capability (Saipan and Enterprise are an exception). If WG would slightly buff USN CV's or nerf the scouting ability of the japanese, it would be closer to "balance".
-
Or maybe, juuuust maybe it could be that the reason why CV winrates are so high (dominated by the premium ones funny enough), is because pretty much only really good CV players are still bothering to play them? And most players just don't bother to learn how to play against them, because so few of them are around? (I main BB's by the way and just recently started to play CV's again) No, this cannot possibly be the case for the high winrates of carriers
-
Anniversary Supercontainers - I am so spoiled
tadaMonika replied to xenopathia's topic in General Discussion
Well, considering that I got 4x juliet charlie flags as cruiser/bb main and a bunch of camos, you were quite lucky. Still bs tho -
So, I recently performed a clean install of Windows 10 (professional) and had to reinstall WoWS, obviously. Problem is, that I can no longer log in to the game. Everytime I try, this pops up: "Error connecting server. Cannot connect to the server. Please try again later." Any of you got the same problem, or am I alone with that, bcs I screwed something up? (All my other online games and applications work like a charm btw, also I am playing via LAN) Things I've tried so far: -resetting router -disable windows defender security center (antivirus) -disable firewall -reinstall WoWS Nothing worked, obviously. Someone has any ideas? Would be much appreciated :) (sorry for my bad english btw. Not a native speaker)
-
Would love to give some feedback, but all I get when I try to login is "Error connecting server. Failed to connect to the server. Please try again later." Did even reset my router. No change. Quite awesome
-
Schon gemacht. Keine Veränderung.
-
Also niemand hat Probleme von wegen "failed connecting server- please try again later"? Ziemlich nervig.
-
Error connecting server... Nice. Whatever I am done for today.
-
Well... 13:00, I guess?
-
So, as you just read in the title, the german BB Bismarck is missing her rangefinders on turret "Anton" (the front turret). Why is it missing in game? Anyone knows? It is not a big problem ofc, but it would not take much to fix it, so why not say something lol PS: Dunno, if this really is the best place to post this, but I am doing it anyway
-
Yea, seems like Bismarck and Tirpitz did have their A-turret rangefinders removed. I would say it looks better with the rangefinders, but that's historically correct, I guess. However I cannot find a single picture of the Scharnhorst missing her rangefinders.
-
Okay... But shouldn't we get all ships in their "undamaged" condition? I mean if we are speaking "historically accurate", this game for the most part would be a diving-game to explore the wrecks of almost every ship here. Also the Bismarck's AA-suite is not historical, but would belong to the Tirpitz. Just saying. Also, Scharnhorst and Tirpitz are missing their frontal rangefinders, too... Maybe this is the reason, that those ships are really inaccurate?
-
Aren't the smokestacks also the Nagato ones? I thought Mutsu had two straight ones?
-
I had 2 in the last 3 weeks. Got a Texas and 5 million credits. Well made up a bit for the 2 others I had which gave me lots of really bad flags...
-
RPF / RDF / RADIO LOCATION: The Ultimate Petition To The Devs
tadaMonika replied to t3h3th32's topic in General Discussion
Signed -
So where is this stuff, that we are supposed to get?
-
Yeah, most of the time its 58-62 fps, thats right. I mean, its how it should be, right? But 47 and 27 fps seem to be the magic numbers, when the fps do drop. As I said, mostly with many smokescreens and/or aircraft displayed, the drops do happen. I just dont know, how. Smoke is resource intensive, yeah, but the game does not even look good enough to justify these drops on good PC's. I can just imagine, that it is badly optimised. Maybe Notser has a secret config for his WoWs.ini file or something like that, because yeah, he does indeed run the game flawlessly. I dont think that this is a hardware problem.
-
I have these problems, too. FPS jumping anywhere from 27 to 62 randomly, although it does happen a lot more then there are many smokescreens and/or aircraft displayed. Given the specs of my PC, this should not happen in this game, but its badly optimised. It is not even running on DX11. Changing graphics has no impact whatsoever (again my pc should run this flawlessly at 100+ fps all the time). We just have to wait for a DX11 patch next year which will likely be accompanied by performance fixes. My specs: i5 4690, GTX 1060, 16GB Ram, Windows 10
