Culiacan_Mexico

Venting is fine, but as for radar... it isn't going to be removed from the game. I personally believe WG wants to add more of it, especially to DDs and BBs. They may 'modify' it in the future, the far future, but that is it.

I guess I will answer, as a potato, I have no problem with it because it is a game design choice for balancing made by WG. Is the ability for ship AA to take out aircraft through land mass a game balancing choice or just sloppy? I don't know, but I tend to think it is the later. I mean stealth fire made it into the game unintentionally, and stayed there for sometime.

I don't see WG ever adjusting this, although I believe they should.

I am think the will go deep water torpedoes only, plus AP only on the guns. They haven't used that combination yet.

I would prefer balance also, but until WG figures out what they actually want... I am not interested in seeing another gimmicky line of DDs. Just my opinion. Beside Russian BBs are going to have cruise missiles and it will be perfectly balanced.

I would prefer they did not go live until French and Russian BB goes live.

My first job, after getting my degree, was working on helicopter flight simulators with some very old technology. I am 58 years old. This isn't the exact hard drives the UH-1 simulator used but it was of this era. It had two drives, 10 platters, total storage 10MB each drive.

I can't disagree, that up till now, it has mostly been this way.

In ranked, sure; but in random... I don't know yet. The smoke change should allow DDs to do a version of stealth fire against BB and CA when a spotter isn't present. Will that be of value... maybe.

WG has said they don't want to nerf DDs or British CLs using smoke. They also seem to be looking at deep water torpedoes on CVs, which would be a buff to DDs. Of course the have said many things, so you could be right.

While I am not sure how I feel about these changes as a whole, I don't think the intent is to enhance BBs.

I am not opposed, but I still think WG worries bout wait time in the Q. It isn't working.

At this point in time... does it need it?

Number of battles play in ship type. I believe S_O has stated, in the past, that historically stats on new ships fall as more players move into them. For the most part, that is what I have noticed. Will the Conqueror fall from those heights with out WG taking action....?

In what way? I am neither agreeing or disagreeing, just interested in your opinion.

I am not sure WG looks at individual player stats all that much; as I believe it was S_O who stated they look at the top, middle and bottom 5% of all games played for balance. As for WG listening to opinions on the forum,... not without a lot of fire and pitchforks.

Hopefully not. WG should watch this video; during it Flamu comments positively on the game play of the Montana captain, yet he still gets wrecked. This wasn't an instance of a poor player getting owned, but what could be a balance issue. They shouldn't fault the messenger.

The first computers I worked on used paper tape to input the boatloader. Honeywell 516s and 716s, octal with pre TTL logic. The good old days.

Hydro on cruisers is ok, I would just like to see land mass block it. I don't think it should have been put on DDs or BBs, but it is done.

The seems to be WGs plan.

That is not the reason.

They may see it as a non-issue or it maybe one of their highest priorities... just like CV rework/balancing. They both seem to have gotten the same amount of attention.