Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Tyrendian89

Players
  • Content Сount

    4,608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    8139
  • Clan

    [TTTX]

Everything posted by Tyrendian89

  1. as long as she keeps the RoF, which is the main thing responsible for the unique feel and appeal imho, I won't complain about her being balanced.
  2. Tyrendian89

    Radar is OP (Not vs smoke)

    sidenote, Atlanta's getting Radar in 0.5.9...
  3. except it really wouldn't - since, as per system, you can't have higher tier skills without havign those below it. So they can't take away SA as your only T1 skill without breaking everything/giving a full refund, which they are reluctant to do for monetary reasons. They had to replace it with something straight away, and BoS is probably the most generalist skill in the list.
  4. mh on DDs for sure, on BBs I much prefer BoS. Not exactly the ideal way to do this, but they had to do something I guess - and BoS is (at least marginally) useful on every ship.
  5. Tyrendian89

    0.5.9 ... No BBs but voice chat!?!

    liking what I see - the method of dealing with respecs regarding SA is not ideal but good enough - I'm just annoyed that my Benson, Fletcher and Kagero all have 15pt captains so I can'T choose what I get instead of it
  6. Tyrendian89

    Prince of Wales

    that's got to be (one of) the ugliest planes ever built. Go on, prove me wrong with even uglier ones - I look forward to it!
  7. I wonder why, considering your history infamy ;) But, if we're completely honest here, you haven't been trolling for quite a while. And this thread, lack of using search aside, is reasonable enough as well. So, let's put away our pitchforks for now folks
  8. Tyrendian89

    Prince of Wales

    and, looking at Saipan, fewer more modern aircraft can work pretty well if played right (although that might also be due to Air Supremacy being way too powerful and accessible on her...)
  9. I'll reserve judgement until I've played both... but I'm not in the Riot camp^^
  10. of course we aren't sure, as Thorontir said himself. But that's what was datamined, so it's all we have to go on for now. I'm not 100% sure myself I dare believe in Torps on a silver BB yet, but one can hope... And the difference that Torpedoes on a Battleship make is more psychological than anything else. You know you have them, so you can close on enemy BBs much more confidently because you know you have an ace in the hole. And the enemy (usually...) knows you have them, so many players will do their damndest to not get close to a Tirpitz - which often means they turn and run, both giving you a lot of "indirect" pushing power because of the space that creates and presenting you and your allies with some VERY juicy broadsides when the enemy sees you coming at them. And hey, I've sunk Shimakazes with my Torpitz Torps, so occasionally they are actually useful in killing things...
  11. Tyrendian89

    Manual fire control

    wrong for manual AA. Your AA still does its normal work, with large caliber guns getting the 100% bonus against focues targets. good warning for secondaries tho!
  12. Tyrendian89

    teamkiller guilty but come on

    no. you torp anywhere your allies might go, you effed up big time and deserve to be pink. Behave, and it'll go away after a couple of matches.
  13. Tyrendian89

    Manual fire control

    they work via normal focus targetting for their respective armament class - so ctrl+clicking the squadron/ship sets it as priority target, and you will get the respective bonuses
  14. Tyrendian89

    playtogether

    you're late http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/56471-play-together-available-in-eu/page__st__20#topmost
  15. Tyrendian89

    Apologies about the Scharnhorst

    one way to increase your count of created threads I guess..
  16. Tyrendian89

    The Battleship Scharnhorst is here

    that is either a real mean attempt at abusing the hype by purposefully seeming to indicate she's in the shop, or you've played alongside one of the supertesters, in which case you're waaaaaay behind the news mate
  17. To be frank, this may be close to the truth, at least for some. Maybe contacting Supremacy first and/or getting a draft of the rules finalized before announcing the league would have been the way to go. Letting the participants have a say in the final rules is definitely not a bad thing, but going (and I exaggerate quite a bit here for dramatic effect, no offense intended!) "So, hello everyone, we would like to try to make this tournament, but we neither have a rule set nor any sponsors yet" might have looked a bit shady to some. Hindsight is obviously 20/20 here, and especially sponsors are always a hen-and-egg problem when setting up something like this. I (and I think I speak for all of ToraToraTora here) sure hope something will end up coming of this in the end!
  18. Tyrendian89

    Rigged Matchmaking

    you are doing an average job of doing your job, and your sample size is minuscule. I mean, you cry about 16 games? really? Play a few dozen more, and then when you still have crappy winrate we know it's your fault - for now it's just you having a bad day.
  19. your point being? last I checked, 3.5rpm is more than 3rpm (both of which are historical figures by the way). Your signature, sir, is a sadly accurate description of your behaviour in this thread...
  20. ahh now I see what you mean! still not for this part tho...
  21. ...again, what???? What does that have to do with... anything (and where did you get the idea to mix up ship classes anyway)???
  22. Any news on this by any chance?
  23. Tyrendian89

    German BBs+ tier 6 premium French BB Dunkerque stats in 0.5.9

    pardon my french, but what the fudge did he say?
×