DasTongle

Yes that she might be but she also has at least some weakness. That Russian Thing needs you to be able to smoke, then push button and profit. it gives up nothing for it, is trollish as crap unless you can fire from multiple angles on it... really just beyond me how to implement it like this.

3 Directives played , no Missions. As expected. And no WG, i will not pay to early access anything ever.

That Ship litteraly illustrates what can go wrong when you pair wooster with a mino and put it in one ship she gets HE for the radar... thats just substantially bad.

I can not speak for the guys that drew some ship out of the Container in Early Access. Something is a bit off otherwise they wouldn't get a normalization buff but still I have witnessed some pretty horrible usage of the Italian Cruisers since they got into Early Accesss. things that wont work in normal Cruisers.

SO This.... Adapting to a vessel helps a lot there where a few duds here and there back in the day, (Furrytaco before getting dual turret layout, Colorado, the first York itteration) that where a pain to make work but since then every ship has become rather workable.

11th Position... I AM RNG.... smack dab...

Yes really i am not trolling i abuse the assumption that british bbs shoot he, till i don't and dev strike the Cruiser that thought broadsiding is a good idea ;) ALSO THUNDERER!!!!!! <33

I did read it like that, you just have to be specific to point out how much broken the ship is at the current itteration. Beeing Russian does not exactly help. :/

I do only have a gripe with the spawning in of torpedos no matter what angle the enemy has torps fly your way in ridicolus numbers... makes it very unfun

None of the mentioned above Ships have the Combination of sheer Gunpower with hard to punish for smoking up. The Belfast still is the worst offender in the lot. But if you catch this ships slightly in their smoke you can permanently punish them as they don't have a heal to compensate.

While i do not assume any nation Bias, the current Soviet Ships are so far over the Top in to many Categories that it is dictating the "Meta" you have to play in the Clanbattles. There are many new Vessels introduced that throw tactics and positioning completely out of the window and just focus on brutally stupid concepts. And i also agree that we don't see a full fledged meta like it in the game because most people simply did not have the time to grind out more Sovietships or a Smolensk etc. At this very moment we have to much focus on power creeping vessels that simply come build in with the advantages that others didn't have. And i personally dislike that. Kremlin for me is plain stupid because you can get away with so many mistakes while punishing any mistake made by anyone inside 10km. Smolensk has one Consumeable to much, it is either the hydro or the smoke that has to go at somepoint. And yes you just don't see a grozovoi because no cvs are in the Clan Battles. I wouldn't like it either if there is a German or US Ship with this perks. The whole concept is questionable as it is at the moment.

Mir ist es Persönlich gleich, aber ich würde in einem PVE Scenario erwarten das Spieler es härter angehen als im PVP Modus der deutlich besser belohnt ist.Und das es dort durchaus mehr Kartoffeln gibt muss ich dir ja nicht erzählen...

Heut mal extra Hübsch gemacht....

Random ist diesbezüglich das Thema, Tut mir leid wenn ich als Spieler in einem Player VS Player Game das Matchmaking kritisiere dann sollte ich auch den Hauptmodus dabei im Visier haben. Die so genannten "Unicum" spieler treiben sich allerhöchstens zum Missionen erfüllen in der Co-Op. Zu dem hat Co-Op rein gar nichts mit der Klasse der Individuellen Spieler zu tun weil Positionierung und Game Grundverständnis so absolut gar nichts mit dem Ausgang vom "Match" zu tun haben. Applaus das du so viel Co-Op fährst. Nicht mein Cup of Tea. Aber wenn ich mich nur mit dummen Maschinen klopfe dann sollte ich vieleicht meinen Kopf aus Themen wie dem Matchmaking in PVP Games raushalten da ich eigentlich nicht wirklich betroffen bin.

Kievs 76mm Secondary ftw...

Dieses Szenario ist dir in deinen 3! T8 Random Battles so oft passiert das du hier Aburteilen kannst ja? Okay. Wenn du "vor" dem "Unikumarsch" stehst und die Treffer fängst die er fangen "sollte" Überlegt dir kurz dein Positioning weil der Gegner denkt du bist das bessere Ziel. Btw die Hipper bist du noch nicht einmal in einem Random Battle gefahren. Was leider schon sehr viel über den hier geschriebenen Text aussagt. Fragwürdige Meinung. Aber ich lass sie dir mal.

Carrier Vessel Designation in the US Code stands for Cruiser Voler... it tis quiet... strange...

Thats quiet easy to see because this Navy actually had to fight a whole campaign through the Pacific and had easy the most accessible Stuff for their ships. And there is also a case to be made why it is so hard to make a german DD line happen.Germany had some stadard Destroyers that do not make much of a line to begin with. Add a lenghty Interwar Period to that and suddenly you will be hard pressed for a logical progression.... Also, why is this thing still going? It's just like some Nationals Argue why their Navy is clearly superior. Pointless to argue to be honest.

Edith sagt ich irre.

Hallo Marcel, wie im Einleitungspost schon hinterlegt kannst du dich bequem bei @Die_Sirene oder @Hawk_Hunter oder @Brainzzzzz oder @Pinky0815 oder mir @The_Reichtangle melden.... der TS ist auch dem Post entnehmbar : - Teamspeak: ts3.c0r3.eu Discord Links waren nicht angedacht bisher. Aber auch damit kann ich dienen :https://discord.gg/MRhCSbW

Wut? From South Carolina to Iowa alone are more than 35. And what has the Number of Battleships/ -cruisers to do with discrimination? Very stupid argument sadly is very stupid.

Ich hinterlasse dir auch mal eine PM.