WeGreedy

Anyhow, I'd like to see anything for free exp but a battleship. 375k to 300k... for tier seven, 750k to 600k.. for tier nine. I don't care, but I think there'd be more than enough "buyers".

WG stated they are aware of this "problem". Problem means it is bad. If something is bad, I'd try to do something against it. But what do I know...

Fighting this overpopulation by releasing even more battleships.

How about releasing one destroyer or cruiser, same price, and see how it sells? But yes, maybe WG will loose billions of roubles and become bankrupt.

@Tungstonid @DFens_666 So I am the only one who's sitting on a shiPload of grinded free experience, not knowing what to do with it?

I think you underestimate destroyer/cruiser playerbase.

I'd spend 375.000 on a decent tier seven destroyer/cruiser and 750.000 on a tier nine in the blink of an eye!

Yay, so we eventually get a free-exp cruiser. Next up: battleship with destroyer statistics

Balancing ships by stats?

Kidd would've been a pretty good choice as a free-exp ship, in my opinion. Different gameplay because the single launcher and heal. Oh well and... IT'S NO ING BATTLESHIP! How about that one?!

If it's not a Missouri, you're just not allowed to die! I every time a little bit when I see destroyers launching both or even all three sets directly on a low HP target. Yes, it maybe makes them harder to dodge but I think launching sets next to each other has higher chances of hitting one. I made this table actually for the chances of flooding in the first place, because it is very hard to get those numbers. But it is also quite interesting how much reaction times differ.

Another aspect to think about: If a torpedoboat commander knows what he's doing, you won't be able to target him to get the information shown. I also think it's good to have some information you have to memorise because they are not shown directly in the game.

added Bretagne*~, Duke of York*~, Lyon*~, Normandie*~, Richelieu*~, Roma*~

Even if Musashi is not going to be a free-exp ship it sucks. On one hand WG say we have an overpopulation of battleships and limit them in clan battles (which makes that mode very fun for my). On the other hand the pump out premium battleships like CRAZY! Let's see how many free experience I'll collect until there's anything but a battleship to spend them.

I have to disagree. Without any flaming and trying to be constructive in chat my karma is pretty good.

If Musashi is the fourth one in a row, I'll seriously think about taking a break. They obviously don't want me (destroyer/cruiser main) in the game anymore.

Finally we'll get a tier seven British battleship. Next should be New Jersey, Wisconsin, Illinois and Kentucky or South Dakota and Indiana. I love diversity.

By making HE even better than AP.

That's what we need.

What about Spotter, Fighter and Smoke?!?

This month, but when exactly... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@Negativvv Unfortunately the only T9 ship I have right now is Udaloy. Full AA of course because it's a Russian destroyer, but I guess she's not that well suited as a carrier support ship. Even with Defensive AA.

@nambr9 so you clubbed a tier ten seal!

But isn't 120k Montana AP damage > 150k Conqueror HE damage?