WeGreedy

I'm still a bit sad that Fiamu already has been taken!

Must be Austrian/Swiss clans for sure! One message right at the start is okay to me, more is spam -> misbehaviour.

;)

No! People could spend their complimentary doubloons they earned in clan battles on it. I'm holding my euros for quite a while, too. Latest decisions by WG don't make me want spending any money right now. Since I don't have enough doubloons for my second tier ten permouflage, my Minotaur has to keep Type 5.

Okhotnik only in bundle... //edit Who's that guy -> @Seeteufel? Zero battles

I think Aslain is pretty busy, can we provide icons already in the appropriate size (24x24 pixels)?

I'll also do it once more per class. (descending from left to right) DD: Leningrad, Z-52, Fletcher, Kamikaze R CA: Belfast, Khabarovsk, Minotaur, Fiji, Moskwa, Des Moines BB: Scharnhorst, Iowa (but I don't like battleships in general anymore) CV:

Source: wowsdevblog ST, Italian сruiser Duca degli Abruzzi, tier VII Increased the main battery turret rotation and elevation speed: Horizontal rotation speed increased from 7 to 7.5 degrees per second; Elevation speed increased from 5 to 8 degrees per second; These changes will balance the ship better against other cruisers of the same tier. Please discuss HERE

I think I have a penchant for nasty ships.

Hopefully it's them finally working on a website for clans again! At least there isn't this error 404 message anymore. http://eu.wargaming.net/clans/gateway/wows/profile

IIRC 50% of HE and AP full pen damage can be healed, if that was the reason why you mentioned AP.

Update: Eventuell tut sich was... http://eu.wargaming.net/clans/gateway/wows/profile

That's why it's probably not 100%.

Or as good as forum sometimes. @Boris_MNE I think somewhere in their forum rules it's said they don't want private messages to be published here. I'm such a spoilsport, I know, sorry.

No, not at all. The influence of teamwork is indeed very huge. But it also increases the fun in this game greatly. Not because you win more often, it's just more fun in general. One reason for winrate and PR progression not being in line can be the selection of ships. Missouri versus Iowa for example. The average Missouri player seems to be better, so on the same winrate you should get a worse PR on that ship. Or Belfast versus Pensacola. An average player should get a quite similar PR on both, but his winrate will be higher on Belfast.

I played a lot in divisions lately. The fact that you can increase your winrate that much tells me even more not to care about it. The funny thing is, I play with a by all means averagely skilled friend of mine most of the time, so you don't even need some unicum to carry you.

@ThePurpleSmurf Yep, absolutely clear, thanks for that detailed post. I also think those third party sites work the same way. For example I'd have to click every member of my clan to refresh his stats and get a recent clan overview on wows-numbers. But I don't think that those missing 22k battles on warships.today were all played by below average players to get the WR on wows-numbers down. As already mentioned, I think 46% are way to low, you know... Saipan.. ;) I'd just like to have a least one valid source for stats, recently change from warships.today to wows-numbers, cause first one hasn't benn very reliable.

So 22k battles change WR from 47% to 56% were the total number ist >500,000? I don't think so. Also 56% are more likely regarding Saipan. So wows-numbers seems broken.

I don't give a ship about my winrate anymore. Just trying to play the objectives, that's for me all I can do. Why bother about things I can't affect?

WG presenting just something: EU forum: ... doesn't matter, it's merely the EU! xaxaxaxaxa

Well... @Teob_VG is Count von Count, of course he's good with money.

I know and I'm aware of 25 mm being a lot worse due to game mechanics. But I couldn't find any reliable source on that.

Forum is indeed very unstable today.