Ictogan

There has been prove provided that it did not exist before in the earlier pages in this thread.

Lmao. Not even acknowledging that the 3s delay did indeed not exist before 0.5.5.

1. I've seen things like that a handful of times, it's some weird bug that rarely happens. 2. Pls don't add any RNG to torps, there is already enough RNG in the game.

Stats on last snapshot before you have hidden your stats: https://warships.today/player/500505280/eu/NEUTRALIZER_7M And yes, WR is up to you. There are 11 random players on your team and 12 random players on the enemy team. The enemy will have complete idiots in their team just as often as you and if you aren't an idiot yourself they will have idiots in the team even MORE often than your team. And with a fighter deck, you can merely shut down ONE ship in the enemy team - but you aren't doing much damage either so effectively it becomes an 11v11. Of course you can also spot the enemy team's DDs, but when you do that you don't have enough fighters to effectively stop an incoming strike from the enemy CV. In other words: Even if you play an AS CV perfectly, you have no influence on the outcome of the game because you are only taking one enemy out of the game but you are effectively also out of the game because you can't do significant damage to ships.

I wonder why you have a winrate lower than 50% in all of your t7+ CVs when you are playing fighter decks so well.

People posts threads like this after almost every single update. No, they didn't change anything and you're just experiencing confirmation bias.

On trident CVs will often be spotted before they can even turn around due to their 1km+ turning circles.

Not too sure about it. AA defense isn't really about shooting down planes, it's about area denial. If I'm in a CV and there is one BB who is being escorted by an AA cruiser and another BB who is on his own, I will attack the BB who is on his own. This means that the CA won't get any plane kills, but he still managed to defend the BB he's escorting against my planes by just completely denying me the ability to attack there.

Two topics? I can count a few more than that. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/6347-wows-raw-yamato-gameplay-wgna-approved/page__st__20__pid__1075792#entry1075792 http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/51285-trident-cv-spawn/page__pid__1075820#entry1075820 http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/53244-white-feather/page__st__40__pid__1075800#entry1075800 http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/5783-will-you-be-able-to-target-and-damage-ships-with-aa-guns/page__st__40__pid__1075785#entry1075785 http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/52080-aa-cvsthis-has-gotta-stop-wg/page__st__860__pid__1075763#entry1075763 And that's not even all of them...

I can agree on the points addressed, but spamming this all over the forum is simply annoying the heck out of people who just want to browse the forums and won't accomplish anything.

It's quite pathetic how you keep spamming this to tons of threads and I really hope you get banned for it.

Same goes back to you.

Tsundere class is already in game in form of Atago, so we probably won't see it as an ARP ship because they would sell less Atagos.

Correction: 4 reskinned Kongous

It can also spam AP, has the highest speed in the game and has enough armor to actually bounce some shells unlike most other DDs. This is the first time I've seen someone complaining about Khaba being UP.

Quite frankly I have barely noticed the AA changes in my Taiho, but I can only imagine what happens to Hiryu planes nowadays when they DARE to approach a North Carolina.

Please show me one post where I argued that CVs are UP. All I'm arguing about is that a) CVs aren't OP b) the AA changes in 0.5.6 were stupid c) the way the AA system works should be changed because currently it's neither fun for CVs nor for people being attacked by CVs.

Agreed. But I absolutely hate it when BBs are just staying 5+km behind their cruisers, letting the cruisers get rekt and not contributing a lot to the battle. BBs are armored most heavily, have the most HP and the highest dispersion. I don't know how people can look at that and think BBs are a class that's supposed to be somewhere at the back.

Please for [edited]sake try to argue the same things again after you played a t7 CV. Saying that something is OP that you have no clue about is just utter BS.

Don't get why people think that BBs should be any further away from the enemy than cruisers. Cruisers can't afford to take the amount of damage they are gonna take when they get up close, BBs can to a certain extent.

Why should DPG be the same for cruisers and BBs, but not for DDs? They are the class with the least DPG, yet they aren't really considered UP. But because CVs have the highest DPG, they are OP according to you. Please explain me where the big difference lies if you really think that the DPG of CVs should be the same as the DPG of CAs an BBs.

This. So much this. As long as there are ships that are able to attack others without the other ships being able to shoot back, people are always gonna complain about these ships(DDs and CVs) being OP. Doesn't matter how strong they actually are, doesn't matter how much they get nerfed.

DPG is insanely skewed by which ships you play.

In an individual game, whether you win or not depends on your team. In a large sample size of games, the only player who is in your team every single time is YOU. Thus WR can show how much you contribute to your team on average. If DPG is the only thing that matters, almost all DDs would need a hell of a buff. DPG only means how much damage you do, but it doesn't tell anything about how well you contribute to your team. Now ofc WR can be skewed by things like sealclubbing, divisions and using OP ships, but I still consider it a much more important metric than DPG.

My option is the polar opposite of yours. F*ck DPG, WR is the only stat that really matters to me.