ColonelPete

I was not talking about final ships, ships are discussed months in advance of their release but it is "how product development works", it is common practice, worldwide, just look at the security measures in the product development of big companies and your lack of understanding makes you lash out instead of countering with arguments

The RM BB might also have something to do with it...

they still get the pressure from the playerbase the upcoming ships are still discussed in videos the NDA did not change that the fact remains that you do not understand how product development works your lack of understanding makes you lash out, reminds me of the reaction of some religious fanatics, when their word view is threatened by people who are just telling the truth

When the old ships are better, they are not powercrept. DM is one of the oldest ships in game and still one of the strongest tech tree cruisers.

So new ships can be "OP" even when they worse than non-"OP" old ships? Interesting. Did not know that there are different criteria for "OPness". What are the criteria for old ships?

So Königsberg and Fuso are "OP"?

There is also the Clan Supertest, which involves some Unicum Clans.

I cannot tell you exactly, but the UK CA were quite underwhelming, as were the US BB split, the Strasbourg, Hizen and a few more. But they can post about the finished product and you can inform yourself in the Dev Blog. When people do not inform themselves, that is their personal problem. How often do I need to repeat that WG did not listen to every feedback in the past? Did you expect that to change? SERIOUSLY!? Which ship/line do you think could have been prevented/changed without the NDA? I suggest to read the feedback on the DevBlog more often before throwing around accusations. WG GETS the feedback in ADVANCE, they rarely listen.

So a WoWs ship performing badly in the tests does not not create doubts in the customer? Interesting... The rules are about the how. As I already told you: It did not prevent screw ups by WG. And the information stream is not shut down, that is what the Dev Blogs are for. And they work well. For the people who keep informed, there were no surprises with finished products.

You cannot manage the information stream without rules. That is what they are doing. People are allowed to say what they want about the finished product.

They do not give out the results of their internal tests either, unless it is product ending... And car companies are allowed to let the public test their products on private ground.

We had test videos of three different versions of the same ship, maybe even more. How are they relevant for the finished product? Do you want to explain to a paying customer why feature x of version 1 did not make to the final product? Btw. the old approach did not prevent WG from messing up. Forum is full of it.

When you speak about all the problems your unfinished product has during development, that is not surprising. That is why car and pharma companies do not let the public test unfinished products.

We had just recently a recruting thread listing the requirements.

With that performance, it is unlikely that this will happen. There is a chance that WG will touch the secondary skills, but do not count on it.

Please do, but watching videos will not win you matches. Better to play yourself and form your own opinion.

Still does not do what you claimed... I have seen BB doing better than that. One salvo, one ship gone. If that were the case, why are not more people playing therm? Why does the majority play "high skill" BB?

Kleiner Tipp: Darauf achten das unten in der Anzeige die AA nicht deaktiviert ist. Dann funktioniert sie auch öfter als 1mal in 15.000 Gefechten

When you get a worse hit rating in her than in other ships, you are indeed not aiming properly. And I considered Dead Eye and decided against it, becauses it causes BB to stay back and not tank for the team. It will also be reworked soon.

Then work on your aim. It is not the guns. And why would you even consider sniping when you have already problems hitting stuff?

do not look for 1v1 vs BB, that is not your job when you cannot avoid it, rush him, go for a drive-by and sink him with torps on the way to him, use HE and aim properly, then you will hit more when you reach him, select AP and aim for the upper belt or citadel, depending on target Look for flanking positions, focus cruiser and DD. That is your job.

Scharnhorst deals good and important damage. Select your targets accordingly.

You were talking about having the worst accuracy on the Tier, that is just not true. Nagato - better dispersion at long range, worse dispersion close range, but slower shells, but lacks speed and toughness, performance speaks for itself Colorado - same dispersion, but much slower shells, lacks speed, performance speaks for itself Gneisenau - worse dispersion Lyon - MUCH worse dispersion Duke - worse dispersion King - worse dispersion Strasbourg - worse dispersion Sinop - probably better or least similar dispersion, because of irrgular vertical dispersion Florida - probably slightly better dispersion, because smaller dispersion elipse, despite much smaller Sigma Hood - slightly worse dispersion California - slightly worse dispersion Poltava - probably slightly better dispersion, because smaller dispersion elipse despite much smaller Sigma Nelson - slightly worse dispersion, but slower shells Ashitaka - slightly worse dispersion, except on long range

She has not. Lyon is MUCH worse

That she is a great ship. http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/shipstatswk/svr/eu/ship_20210227.html there is no BB in game that allows you to rush in and survive at the beginning of the match with 2.0 Sigma, she is accurate enough the pen is sufficient for the targets you should attack most people do fine with her