ColonelPete

Evasion. As I expected. Hopefully you now understand the relevance of peak numbers.

And what does that mean? Showing them the door or serving them?

You said being ready for them.

These 100 cannot order as much in one day than 40 people can over 10 months (that are over 18.000 customers).

No. You do not build a business for peak numbers. Imagine being able to get 1000 customers at once once a year. The rest of the year your Restaurant is filled with less than 10% of that number. Would you build such a business?

That is the way it is counted. Peak numbers mean nothing. Imagine owning a Restaurant with 100 seats. Last year in February you managed to fill all seats. Peak number 100. Rest of the year it was empty. In 2019 your peak number was only 95, but you averaged 40 most of the year. Which year was better for your business?

Peak numbers.

Nope. The average for the first six months since Open Beta was 14.667. The average last year was 14.806.

That were balloon bombs.

Cruiser's skills - "Survivability expert": Still not worth the points "Fearless Brawler" Removed the penalty to the ship's detectability: That makes the skill very interesting, too bad you do not give DD players the option for a reset Battleship's skills "Super Heavy AP Shells": Still unattractive with that penalty, when do you learn that BB are supposed to tank? Making that harder is not good game design Battleship's skills "Dead Eye": good thing it is removed, bad thing is that the replacement is useless, you should have given BB the option to get rewarded for getting closer to the enemy you missed a chance to do something about the secondaries, just a token 5% improvement would have been enough as a sign that you recognize the problem at least we get a reset in autumn

That is torturing. The word "murdering" creates a different impression. And considering that Alaska is one of the tankiest cruisers on Tier IX, she can handle that better than most other cruisers.

Wenn ihr plant gewisse Schiffe in den Verkauf zu bringen, scheint es ja kein Problem mit deren Balancing zu geben. Dann könnt Ihr die auch wieder in den regulären Shop packen.

My expectations for the german DD line are pretty low now. Why should they do less HE damage than the current 150mm DD guns?

and others...

I never said they are unbeatable. You claimed you would be "murdering" them, which is a "slight" difference...

No, she points her guns in a different direction and rushes into the middle of the map to get sunk in crossfire Just think about how long your Eugen oder Odin needs to sink an Alaska...

When one considers winning not useful...

Weil einige veraendert wurden. Siehe Feuerreichweite im Nebel.

It is an ingame auction.

I doubt that they will sell ships that way.

HE spamming a 60k HP target with heal to death, takes some time, when he holds still... Amagi is a BC... And we are talking about the current version of the ship and why it is too strong

Wenn Du die Themen so durcheinander bringst, wahrscheinlich nicht.

Ich kann Dir nur raten in dem Ticket an dem Support ganze Sätze zu benutzen und Dein Problem ausführlich zu beschreiben. Wenn Du so schreibst wie oben, kannst Du damit rechnen das sie Dich falsch verstehen.

a new tree is welcome especially when it is a cruiser tree a new nation is ok too, when she can fill the trees the problem is that this results in a need for more captains, especially since it is planned to move the Friesland from the EU tree, there should be an option to move a captain with the ship this cruiser tree is patchwork, as it includes many projects you put also CL, CA and Supercruiser in one tree, which is bad, especially considering your arguments from the past that you do not like too many thematic changes inside one line the models look fine close quarter cruiser with slow reload is nothing that will work well, they need more firepower or they cannot contribute in the short time before they are sunk or you increase their range Airstrike does not really fit a cruiser line, that is something I expected for a CV line, that does not allow you to control planes (which would be an better option than the current CV) @Congress the idea is ok what is not ok that you want to use the Alaska hull, despite the existence of blueprints for similiar cruisers, that is just lazy while you told us again and again that the intial stats can/will change, you should be aware that these preliminary stats create expectations and are also a testimony of your balancing abilties when the initial stats are too good, large parts of the playerbase will be disappointed when the final result is much weaker the other part of playerbase cannot believe that you put up these stats in the first place, as it is obvious that this initial design is too strong (60k HP for a Tier VIII Cruiser with Heal and Supercruiser armor) when your initial design is extremly far off from the final result, you basicly show us your lack of competence in balancing ships, which does not create a lot of trust among the more critical inclined part of the playerbase

That is just bad and unnecessary, when this results in less rewards.