ColonelPete

Ich hätte es auch anders gemacht. Aber WG hat sich entschieden alle Entwürfe in einen Baum zu packen und noch ein wenig zu phantasieren, damit da ein ganzer Kreuzerbaum rauskommt. Entweder haben die Kaufleute vorgerechnet welchen finanziellen Vorteil das bringt oder WG hat soviel Material für Kreuzer im EU Baum das sie einfach was aussortieren wollten.

No. You play the game for your enjoyment. Time spend in game does not buy you stuff outside the game.

We do not have 10.3 yet... The game did not change today...

You do not buy them for money. And it is known for quite some time that special ships can be changed.

The "buff" was mostly giving back what was taken away.

but less they do not they do not they do not does not look like a CL

Because it helps comparing the different ships and understanding why they perform that way. Just posting the ship names and the WR would be too puzzling for most people, most of the time.

He is talking about improving the ship. The ship does not not need improving. When tankiness is that important to him that something else can get worse on the DM, then he can suggest that...

DM is one of the strongest performing cruisers on Tier X and does not need to be improved. http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20210403/eu_2month/average_ship_u.html

Jetzt sind wir schon bei Lebensmitteln als Erklärung für das MM. Das wird immer besser. Mehr davon!

Noch mehr Märchen

Ich zähle eine Verneinung... Willst Du uns noch mehr Märchen erzählen?

Wieso sollten sie nicht dagewesen sein?

Wenn da nur die ganzen Gegenbeweise nicht wären...

You have it in the patch notes now...

Dev Blog, 11 days ago

Das war eigentlich mehr als klar...

Giving the KM DD the role of CL hunters is like training Antilopes to attack Lions, might work for a moment, but after that you want to be the Lion, not the Antilope... the RM BB changes are questionable, Dante is not strong, Conte is rather fine and Andrea does not need better SAP the removal of the 150mm guns on Z-23 is questionable, especially when Gaede can keep them... - the problem is the introduction of magic shells for some ships, when other ships use the same guns, but do not get the magic shells

Es ist klar das es ein WG Konzept ist, da es keinen Entwurf mit Alaska Rumpf und der Bewaffnung gab. Die US Entwuerfe mit 6 oder 7 305mm Kanonen hatten alle kleinere Ruempfe.

They are not Free XP. They are just XP you can convert to Fres XP with money (not advisable).

The game simulates mass murder, WHEN you put crew into the game. Your suggestion would lead to players ignoring the mission objectives even more than they do now.

I am always impressed how eager some people are to tell us that they do not understand the game yet. You are talking about a weapon, that is launched from stealth, and still does not bother you, and you talk about equality and want this stealth advantage removed?

Why did you not play her from the map border, as you claimed?

That does not answer my question. But I did not expect much.

Which class gets big rewards from stealth torpedos? I must be missing something.