ColonelPete

I do not think you can try the turkish tree soon...

That are the results of the RNG, as I said (but you did not understand). When a ship does 50k damage one week and then does 50k damage the next week, then the RNG cannot have changed between those two weeks.

You did not do that... You can check every week back to 2015: http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20210501/eu_2month/average_ship_u.html

And the results of that RNG are documented and can be evaluated. Different RNG would lead to different results. If nothing changes, the RNG did not change. And your ad hominem attacks show that you know how weak your argument is.

When the stats do not change, dispersion did not change. And the rest is hardly new. Btw. OP was playing RM BB the last couple of weeks. That might explain his impression.

You said dispersion did not change. I said dispersion did not change. Where is the difference?

... which I was saying.

No. I know that players pay attention to the game and the game data and notice changes. It took less than a week and we had a detailed post about the torpedo angle changes on Flechter with proof. And one day later we had an explanation. Try me.

Yes, I read the post.

I am just reading a lot compared to 95% of the other players.

When you do not want to play the game, you can just stop.

Die Entfernung der unwiederruflichen Ränge würde schon reichen. Damit kann sich nicht mit mehr mit Glück nach oben hangeln.

You have to look up the result list. These containers usually include camos. I got hundreds of these camos from the first santa containers.

No. Dispersion was not changed. What are diving mechanics?

Wenn solche Spieler nicht gemeldet werden, passiert auch nichts. Ich weiss von einem aehnlichen Spieler, der schon mehrfach temporaere Sperren erhalten hat. Aber diese Sperren liegen teilweise weit auseinander, weil der Spieler einfach nicht gemeldet wird. Ja, WG koennte sich da geschickter anstellen und auch proaktiver sein, aber letzendlich brauchen sie Beweise. Einen Unschuldigen zu bannen kommt halt nicht gut.

Deactivate your ships carousel mod, as stated multiple times on the forum since Saturday.

And 1k are not 50%. And you use smoke when it is useful.

My DD battles do not last 15s or less and even bad players should have trouble keeping it that short. While gun duels are important, Blyska battles do not consist of 1v1 slugfests with Vauquelin. Therefore you have to consider the whole battle and not 15s and that is where the difference gets MUCH smaller. And as I said, that is why Blyska has smoke and Vauquelin not. And when the Vauquelin player messes up, he is the one getting sunk from smoke. Did that often enough. Depends on how you play.

That is only for 15s and Blyska has smoke for that. Compared to a minute or even a full battle the difference in firepower is MUCH smaller. Blyska has more guns than Vauqelin, so missing a shell loses Vauquelin more dpm. No 8x102mm guns for AA.

That was with the 8x102mm setup. She did not have the 120mm guns anymore.

There is no Tier VII DD with double her firepower, not even close. Vauquelin has 1k more Base HE DPM and 2k more Base AP DPM. That is less than 2% difference.

Francesco ist das zweitmeistgespielte Schiff im ganzen Spiel in den letzten 2 Monaten. Und dafür macht sie eine gute Figur.

To keep more veterans at Tier V+. Veterans meeting new players can be solved by MM (we now have a new player protection of 200 battles, which could be extended even further).

Not enough Base XP. You have to do the 250 XP mission in one battle.

The fact that you cannot do missions is the reason low Tier has such a low population. WG could revive low Tier and make it more popular if at least some missions were available below Tier V (like daily missions).