ColonelPete

Being a possibility, as I said, is a fact. You confirmed yourself that there is a possbility, meaning the probability is >0. So you were just talking about WG earning money and not WG doing something else? Still, not all companies do that. That is why we have non-profit companies.

Ach das ist das Problem. Du willst 100% Schutz. Dann sagt das doch gleich. Ich dachte da liegt eine spielerische Schwäche vor, aber das ist einfach Unvernunft.

next patch...

Das eine ist Dein Problem, das andere die Serverstatistik. Und die Serverstatistik zeigt eindeutig das eben nicht über die Gefechtszeit sinnloser Schaden zusammen gefarmt wird. Sonst käme beim zweitmeisten gespielten Tier VII Tech Tree BB nicht diese Siegrate raus.

Never claimed they are. It is just how they are called. And I just explained to you why you do not read about all identified data manipulation. It is just not interesting enough for everyone. Yes, the "already known" MM manipulation is not made up And I already explained to you, that everything that is possible does not necessarily happen, or do you really consider getting murdered by people being close to you? Everything can be manipulated. You could be paid by the competition to sow distrust among the WoWs playerbase. But as I said, something being possible does not mean it happens. Do you check your apartment every day for electronic bugs or micro cameras? They could be there.... That is a fact. Interest dictating a certain course of actions is not a fact, otherwise EVERY company would have to behave like that. Doubtful.... And please do not imagine me calling you certain names. I have no interest in being part of your dreams. Then why does this not happen to everyone? And you also do not understand that something that is possible, does not automaticly happen. There are enough people in your city that could be robbing you and have the motive to do so, do you get robbed every day? Not everything that is possible, happens. Think about what you can do with a lighter and how often you burned down a house... Btw. the MM thread is FULL of complaints with proof that MM does NOT match according to player performance. So please spare us your baseless theories.

Das siehr mir jetzt nicht so sinnlos aus....

Je nach Klasse soll man das ja auch nicht vermeiden... BB, die nicht beschossen werden wollen sind die Pest. Das schöne an Feuer ist das man Zeit hat darauf zu reagieren. Man bekommt den vollen Schaden nicht sofort, wie z.B. bei AP, sondern über Zeit. Man sucht sich dann in Ruhe eine Deckung oder lässt sich zugehen und dann macht man die Feuer einfach aus. Und nein, da gibt es keine Problematik. Die Beschwerden haben wir seit 2015 und die Zahlen haben damals schon deutlich gezeigt das der Feuerschaden eben nicht zu hoch ist. Berücksichtigt man das Heilpotential ist der effektive Schaden sogar recht gering, weshalb die klassischen HE Spammer Kreuzer oft Schwierigkeiten haben Gefechte zu entscheiden (Yoshino, Wooster, Henry, Zao,...). Und "just dodge" ist ein gutes Stichwort, wenn ich mir die vielen halb stationären BB anschaue, die Bug voran zum Gegner stehen und sich wundern wieso sie abgefackelt werden. HE hat weniger Alpha als AP, durchweg. Wie schon mehrfach aufgeführt lässt sich Schaden vermeiden (Positionierung, Ausweichen, Anwinkeln, Deckung, Schiffsausrüstung, Kapitänsskillung). Mir gehen eher selten die Aufladungen meiner Reparatur aus. Und ich bin mir sicher die meisten Spieler sehen ihrer Kreuzer lieber brennen, als sofort am Mehresboden zu liegen, weil AP aus dem unmöglichsten Winkel in die Zitadelle geschlagen ist

And Tone comes next.... That is even more planes in the air. You were told multiple times that player controlled planes are a bad idea for Hybrids. And since they are premiums, this not something that is easily changed...

There is a diffetence between 128 and 150mm shells. The Full Penetration area should be smaller as 150mm guns need 25mm effective armor to even activate the fuse.

I do not like her either, but the players make her work quite well, until now. Will be interesting to see how the release to the general playerbase changes the performance.

Which is the core principle of RNG... Then you should be able to formulate the theory. You cannot check the validity of theories when the core parameters of the theories are missing. That is the 101 of conspriracy theories. Be as vague as possible and all counterarguments can be countered by adapting the theory or be excused by the soon to be revealed information....

That still needs variables that govern who is how affected. If you cannot say that, the theory is not worth much. It looks more like someone looking for excuses when the results are different from what you want.

The news are not interested to report such things from a village on the other side of the world. Otherwise newspapers would be thick as books and news-sites would be hard to navigate, apart from the manpower needed to control such an information flow. And I know how people behave and what they make up to make stuff fit their world view, especially on the web...

Considering how many people get hurt by their own family members or "friends", then that is also a possibility you should consider, right? And if WG does mess with the MM, why are some people affected and some not?

Vielleicht mal an die eigene Nase fassen.

And still we hear regularly about manipulated data being identified...

And all of them become obvious when you evaluate the data...

With Mx stats one can evaluate the stats of teams over many matches. People have done that. The results were quite balanced.

Either it is rigged or it is not. That means winning teams in steamrolls are supposed to have great RNG and losing teams have bad RNG. When you do not get great RNG in a winning steamroll or do not get bad RNG in a steamroll loss, then that theory goes bust and shows that RNG is just RNG, good or bad.

Dir steht es frei Dich für den Moderatoren Job zu bewerben. Dann kannst Du sehen was Du "alles" bekommst.

Yes, that also possible for people close to you. Btw. people did know about gravity. They just named it differently and did not know how it worked. But that it worked was obvious.

Bei mir nicht. Und wenn man sich die Statistiken der vergangenen Jahre anschaut, ist es unwahrscheinlich das sich das großartig geändert hat. Wie schon gesagt, die Sättigung tritt ein wenn das Schiff abgebrannt ist. Und das ist logisch das Dinge brennen, bis sie verbrannt sind.

People close to you could murder you in your sleep or stab you in the back. Something being possible, does not mean it happens or will happen.

Der Hangar war nicht voll von Benzin. Aber es sollte einem zu denken geben wenn ein Schiff, im Hafen, so lange brennt bevor der Brand gelöscht werden kann. Ach ja, das Container Schiff was letztes tagelang gebrannt hat, ist übrigends auch Schrott und beim Abschleppversuch gesunken. Und die Container waren alle verschlossen, haben trotzdem prima gebrannt.

Seeing something is not feeling™ it and your statement about the MM makes it obvious of what opinion you are. That statement was about Brawls, not Random battles. And being matched with people of your performance does not make the battles unequal.