ColonelPete

That is what the report function is for. For serious cases, you can even contact player support.

Every commanders needs to trained, when you put him on a silver ship. That was never different.

Torpedoversenkungen geschehen hauptsächlich durch DD und ganz wenig durch CA und BB. Versenkungen durch Feuer/Flutungen, geschehen durch CA, DD, BB, CV. Das ist numerisch ein ganz anderes Verhältnis. Die Zahlen zum Schaden habe ich schon gepostet.

Dennoch weißt Du nicht wofür sie gebannt wurden. Und bei jemanden der komplett verbal entgleist ist, weisst Du nicht ob er so etwas öfter gemacht hat. Alternativ hast Du in solchen Fällen die Möglichkeit der Anzeige.

Mine are still there. Do you use any mods?

Weisst Du wer Wiederholungstäter ist und wie oft die "tätlich" waren? Das dürfte auch eine Menge Spieler betreffen, die sich unhöflich über die Inkompetenz ihrer Mitspieler beschweren.

Yepp, patches are BS events.... One would assume that players learn how patchdays work after a couple of years and patches nearly every month...

Es ging da nicht um guten Morgen, sondern um das auf die Füße treten...

Wenn Dich Feuer relativ wenig tangieren, können sie offensichtlich nicht zu stark sein. Dann hätten sie mehr Effekt.

Dazu musst Du aber erstmal fragen ob er das will...

Du beschwerst Dich über einen Mangel an Bann und redest dann über Spieler, die gebannt werden.... Diesen Spielern helfen auch keine Beleidungen. Hast Du schon mal einen Spieler gesehen, der durch Beleidungen besser wurde?

She is magical, with magical guns and shells that have the penetration power of 203mm guns.

Es ist erlaubt. Es kommt nur darauf an wie man das macht. Wer Spieler beschimpft, darf sich nicht wundern.

Meine Kreuzer haben komischerweise keine Probleme mit HE. Da sehe ich AP, die einem aus dem unmöglichsten Winkeln in die Zitadelle zimmert, kritischer. Daher freue ich mich im Kreuzer über jedes BB was HE ballert, da überlebe ich nämlich länger.

2 MM has multiple rules. I did not say anything else. 4 I was talking about refuting arguments, but you are not even doing that... I have noticed that you see things that are not there, so I should not be surprised that you see Holy Grails that are not there. As if the state of CV balance had anything to do with performance based MM, to the contrary. On one side you complain that WG cannot balance CV properly and on other side you suggest that WG is competent enough to manipulate the MM secretly to their advantage. That does not fit together. Only when your comparison is related to the subject, CV balance is not related to performance based MM

Solche Spieler werden nicht geschützt. Du wählst nur den falschen Kanal.

2. That would be still general performance based MM, as it would be always active, but that is something one could see, but we do not - that is why you brought up limited performance based MM to save the theory. 4. I thought you planned to counter my arguments. Do you even know how this works? You have refute the arguments of the other person. Lecturing about the wider context does not refute anything.... I never claimed the MM is something of a Holy Grail. I did not even state anything that would come near that. I am just explaining what the MM does and what not and what we would see, would the MM work differently. But you do not seem to understand that. Instead you make stuff up and ramble on about stuff that has nothing to do what we are discussing. Reminder: before you make arguments moot, you have to refute them, that does not work by writing about something else, you need to adress the arguments of the other person. Do you really need this to be explained to you?

Also ich duerfte nach 19 Gefechten durch sein.

Nicht das ich wüsste. Es gibt aber noch andere Easter Eggs auf Inseln.

Das ist zum Anschauen. Ist schon seit Jahren im Spiel.

the rest of the code is a bit more complex, otherwise you would not need programmers for that the code for targeting and dispersion is something people need to regularly work on (bugfixes or just trying to (in)validate bug reports), hard to do in a small group

They stated this multiple times. It should be known to you.

Bei mir betragen die sonstigen Versenkungen (abzgl. Rammen und Secondaries) gerade mal 12% meiner Gesamtversenkungen....

As you said yourself, they had only few planes in one region of the world. And these strikes were planned and not called in. The US or UK did that much better back then.

2. We are discussing meaning, 4. It just has nothing to do with what I said and the matter we discuss, unless you want to start a discussion about your honesty. I do not really want to go there. We were talking about performance based MM and signs that it is implemented. Bringing up something else does not really help your case, to the contrary. MM mirrors selected ships quite often, especially in CoOp. That is why chosing specific ships improves your chances of meeting them. this opens the company to manipulation (employees do something different than they are told) this opens up the company to extortion this creates a risk for the company as people can become ill, have accidents or die software companies suffer from fluctuation - people change companies or just the department or get promoted and new people take over the old jobs, which increases the number of people with that knowledge over time with Wargaming and Lesta, there are two companies involved, which should increase the people with that knowledge even further