ColonelPete

Daher benutzt man DmGCon auch nicht, es sei denn man steht sicher oder hat keine andere Wahl. Zwei Feuer lasse ich regelmässig brennen und selbst bei drei Feuern warte ich schon mal ganz gerne bis ich wieder sicher stehe. Wenn Du mit Signalen arbeitest, gleicht eine Reparatur 1,5 Feuer aus. Davon ab eignet sich eine Vermont nicht sehr gut alleine zu pushen, dafür ist sie einfach zu langsam. Wie gesagt, meine BB brennen er selten ab und dafür braucht man keinen 18k Abstand.

Du hast aber im Gegnerteam nicht jedesmal 2-3 Smolensks, vor allem nicht auf Deiner Flanke. Und dennoch kann man Vorruecken, nur vorsichtiger.

Nein. Damit meine ich das Du Deine Aufgabe vielleicht mit einer anderen Herangehensweise erledigt hättest. Und Gesunken bist Du kein guter Support für Deinen DD. Und nein, auch 2016 war es eher eine schlechte Idee mit einer Kurfürst von Anfang an zu pushen. Aber ich sagte ja bereits das Replay hier weiterhelfen könnte. Man kann nur mit Sicherheit sagen das die gewählte Vorgehensweise nicht funktioniert hat.

Scharnhorst is quite good at penning BB, just do not aim at the main belt from a distance.

You could ask the players who got a chat or even a game ban...

I am sure that you believe™ that, but that is as far as it goes. Luckily for us, Fleming was a Scientist and he proved that Penicilin would work, as nobody would have produced it on a hunch.

My wording was precise enough. The problem is with people that believe, have a hunch or have feelings™ concerning the topic, they tend to miss the details and read what fits their view. And I am pretty sure I already wrote said... 3.5 is not a bad edition. That can be a good outlet for your imagination.

2. I said that when general performance based MM is active, then you have that all the time and that is not limited performance based MM you believe, that means you are beyond reason in that matter you prove nothing, you do not even know what metrics are used and how they are faulty, once again, you just claim something with tea it works even better

It happens, but it s rare. Usually one side pushes. That is why claiming that BB are unable to push is just wrong. Inferior players usually lose, that is not new either and will not change with maps then there is no ship in your broadside on the other side of the map depends on the situation, a bad trade or not even trading at all and just throwing your ship away is no help suiciding DD are a different matter, but you usually do not need secondaries for them

Dann schlage ich Dir die Izumo vor.

2. That does not mean that, as performance based MM is not part of the rules. And I told you that one could see a general performance based MM, if it were active. 4. You do nothing else than writing offtopic or making claims. So now performance bases MM is like a Religion to you. That explains a lot. And no, we do not use the same metric for evaluating CV and MM. Can you get anything right? And the armory is also part of the game, but has nothing to with either of these things. You cannot bunch everything together, because they have one commonality.

The cap lines are usually crossed in the 2nd half the match, that is not really new That usually happens when one side sleeps or the other just plays better, that usually means using HP to eliminate targets quickly Good luck angling against a ship on your broadside, on the the other side of the map, when you have two+ enemies in front of you at around 15km or closer Did not say that and neither do I agree. It is all a matter of timing. DD hardly care about secondaries. They either stay unspotted or out of range.

Du scheinst wohl der Meinung zu sein das es keine Verbesserung ist das Spieler keine Tier II Schiffe in Tier X Gefechte bringen können oder das eine Seite einen CV hat und die andere nicht. Von ungleicher Tier Verteilung pro Team reden wir mal gar nicht. Und ja, eine Tirpitz kann locker mehr als 12k Schaden im Tier X Gefechten machen.

Die Frage, die Du Dir stellen solltest ist welche Linie Dir am meisten Spaß macht.

that is great when you are the one shooting AP, you should be glad about that for some reason nearly every match one team manages to push, wonder how they do that... open maps are a bigger problem with AP, as enemies can shoot your side over half the map, when there is no cover... and when you play BB for their secondaries, it becomes obvious you sail too aggressive secondaries were always a gimmick and not really efficient, one can use it for the fun of it, but one should not expect it to be easy, especially not powerful

Falsche Route gewählt. Ein Replay könnte hier weiter helfen....

too bad that they are DD and occupy a DD slot, so it is kinda their job to spot around key areas Def AA will not help much, as their base AA is just too weak while their guns are powerful, they lack DPM and better make sure that your targets do not shoot back or things can get ugly as they have more firepower and hitpoints than you

And that is the problem. Do not spend money on tech tree ships. The normal pace you move through the tech tree is already too fast to gain the proper experience needed to be able to handle the next Tier. By spending money you shorten that time further.

That is a contradiction. When you can show broadside without getting punished, it makes stuff easier, not harder.

you can change in your preferences if you want to see them at the start you can also select them when you click on your name in port

Yes. The problem is not the lone ship, but the more ships with big guns are introduced, the more frequent they become and the harder it gets to angle properly.

The penalties are usually not severe. Repeated offenders can get longer temporary chat bans and many people do not even care about those.

Here we go again... Hiding such awful suggestions among some decent ones does not help. Btw. AP is the main damage dealer for many ships.

Then that should be easy, as these reactions are quite common...

The changes were announced.... Feel free to sue them.