ColonelPete

He did not have special talents, but was unique looking. No idea if he had a unique voice over. But he had 14 points, which you cannot just recruit in game. You are basicly paying for the around 540k Elite Commander XP needed to improve a 6 point commander to 14 points.

The commander in this auction was for credits.

40% Spieler hängen sich nicht rein...

5 posts the Tier VIII faces Tier X DD, the AP performance vs DD has nothing to do with penetration power, as even the Tier VII DD has enough of that, the problem are auto riccochets and overpens and more penetration power does not change that, as I already explained and you once again missed... do not honor your name too much with your actions...

You asked me. And that is what I wrote. Nothing else. Stop misunderstanding me.

when your accusations are empty, there is not much to say - you had 4 posts to support your claim, but you did not, because you could not so much for the disclaimer... btw, this a review thread, not a help thread and the AP performance for the Tier VII and VIII will not change by playing the other Tiers and since I know how the mechanics work and the parameters do not change, it is impossible that the performance changes on Tier IX and X

Das aendert was an dem Freiraum zum manoevrieren, den Du hast. Davon ab haben die Karten die gleiche Groesse von 42x42km wie andere Tier X Karten auch. Ocean als reine Tier X Karte hat sogar nur 36x36km.

Random, CW und Großgefechte sind verschiedene Gefechtsarten. Ich weiß nicht ob Dir es aufgefallen ist das in CW und Großgefechten weniger Schiffe unterwegs sind.

Es gibt keine 6er Karten auf denen 10er Schiffe fahren. Das Maximum ist Battle Tier 7-10. Hier findest Du die Tierzuordnung: https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Maps

Und Du verstehst noch immer nicht das ich dagegen nichts gesagt habe. Lies Dir ruhig noch einmal den Thread durch. Ich war übrigends einer von den über 100...

Das denke ich nicht. Das weiss ich. Aber da Du noch trotz unserer Unterhaltung noch immer nicht verstanden hast welcher Zeitaufwand hinter der Erstellung von 10 Karten steckt und wie lange man für die Z-31 braucht, bringt es nichts Dir das das weiter zu erklärem.

more empty claims then where is your disclaimer? Do not demand from others what you are not willing to do yourself...

Das ist doch offensichtlich. Es gibt zuviele Leute hier im Forum, die sich ähnlich verhalten wie Du. Schau nur wieivel Beiträge unsere Unterhaltung generiert hat. Und ich führe meist mehrere Unterhaltungen dieser Art parallel...

Oh, the sad panda argument, how cute. you asked me why I do not hit them reliably and now you admit that it is not possible - that has nothing to do with flip-flopping, I am explaining to you why citadels are key at the end of the battle results, but you do not notice it during the battle, as individual SAP salvos give better results, but in the end you see that your AP salvos did more overall damage, thanks to the few citadels - so you have to decide to use AP instead of SAP, despite the fact that the majority of AP salvos give worse results, but the few salvos that get citadels, increase the average damage per AP shell hit above the average damage of SAP shell hit, which makes the choice between AP and SAP basicly gambling - when you cannot get citadels because of RNG, the choice of AP is inferior - in other words, on average SAP is the inferior choice, but in some battles it would have been better to stick to SAP, but you know that after the battle - and that is the design flaw of SAP, as SAP does not have a unique selling point most people cannot predict 33s+ into the future how an enemy ship is angled.. I said SOME FR BB are similarly bad, as they have the same base dispersion and sigma as RM BB... - if BB DPM does not matter, then BB with 2 minute reloads are not weaker? I wonder why the reload booster is so strong, it just imrpoves the DPM for a few seconds... "works well" means significantly reducing the damage you recieve, not reducing the damage to zero... AP and HE complement each other, AP and SAP do not, see above - HE works when AP and SAP do not work well as I explained, but you ignored: not like germans - and yes, 406mm guns were planned, which WG put into a premium, instead of making it a tech tree ship " its little 320mm guns don't hit that hard " - "it doesn't have the alpha to justify a long reload" (Interesting point when you claim "DPM is not a valuable comparison") --> the reload is too long for the Alpha and the guns would hit harder with better sigma - she has worse parameters than the GC one Tier lower, if AD had the same parameters on Tier VI, she would be more fun

then do not claim something you cannot prove you are human, right? humans are not perfect, right? where is your disclaimer that your opinion might be flawed?

nope why should I experience something that does not get better?

then do not say that... but we are talking about the AP performance vs DD, which I experienced... should have been obvious with a cursory glance at the forum or playing a couple hundred battles

there are enough videos of unicum players that do not hit the citadel every time, so hitting the citadel reliably is not possible the example was for the case where you aim when you have SAP loaded hit rates of RM BB show that the ships get played close enough to get hits or that the players are more skilled than players of other ships, which is not unusual for a new line; as you have seen yourself, RM BB have the worst dispersion in game, only some of the FR BB are similarly bad, but they have a better DPM if you think that angling does not work very well vs SAP, you are free to show more broadside HE is better at doing damage vs angled targets, you can test it in the training room and compare damage done by AP and SAP Roma is played differently than all other lines before. She is a mix of KM and FR BB. She is more tanky than FR BB and less tanky than KM BB. She is made for flanking, but can be more aggressive than FR BB, since she is tougher and stealthier, they could have made the whole line like this the parameters you do not like on the Andrea Doria are the result of SAP, without SAP, she would be better, she could have a shorter reload and a better Sigma and would be more fun overall

then do not ask about the concept of Khaba... I played some of the ships we are talking about, and the AP performance vs DD does not get better at Tier IX and X, to the contrary, more Krupp and velocity result in more overpens your estimate only shows that you do not know much about the playerbase

Wenn Du das nur gesagt hättest, hast Du aber nicht. Du hättest spekulieren können das wenn WG X Kartendesigner eingestellt hätte, dann hätten die Y Karten machen können oder wenn jeder bei WG alles stehen und liegen gelassen hätte und jeder von Putzfrau bis Geschäftsführer nur an neuen Karten gearbeitet hätte, dann hätten sie Z Karten erstellen können. Aber stattdessen bis Du konkret geworden und hast behauptet: " Z-31 mein Beileid für den Haufen hätten Sie 10 Maps machen können" . Und als Ich das in einen vernünftigen Tonfall in Frage gestellt habe, bist Du gleich mit Deinem Stempel gekommen.

I bid 92M and did not win. As expected, the winning bid inreased from the last time.

That happens when playing during off hours. Some people never learn.

that is why DD guns are not the best weapons vs BB, and Haragumo has "a bit" more DPM than Khaba... you can, the 25mm plating is not that big compared to the ship either and that is the definition of popularity 40% unicums? - it is obvious who is bringing up braindead arguments...

taking down BB takes too long it is when they aim for the plating they cannot pen, instead of aiming for the superstructure... that were not stats of the average player, but stats of all players with open stats on the server, and getting a Khaba is the same as all other Tier X Tech Tree DD - when a person decides not to get her and go for another DD, that is called being less popular and when you want discuss her popularity among 1.4% of the playersbase, then you should get data for that before you start guessing like bringing up unicums when you argue the general popularity of a ship?

but they are, the Sovjet gunboats are better vs DD and worse vs CA and BB and have shorter torps in the gunboat line when people cannot aim, that is not a problem of the ship - when somebody does not know that the new KM DD have a better plating, then that person is no threat anyway... posting useless stats and sticking with them is no small error... looks more like not reading properly - that can lead to amusement