ColonelPete

Then do not talk about low Tier, when you do not understand what that means. Especially when I gave you a hint many posts ago, but you did not even get that. That is why I did not say that... Or do you think the server performance data shows that Yoshino performs stronger than Zao?

While I agree, it is doubtful that WG will do something with this performance:

Says the bob who does not know what low Tier is.... It means that something performs better. It is just stating facts. It does not say why that is the case or if something is better. You could race in a Formula 1 car and perform worse than a profesional in a Formula 3 car. That does not make the Formula 3 car better than Formula 1 car.

As I said, you have no clue what low Tier is. Tier VII is not low Tier. Nope. Read that sentences again. As I said:

I did not say that. Are you ok? I said that I did NOT play the majority of MY battles low Tier. Or do you need me to call someone to help you understand? But I did not... Which clearly shows that you still do not understand my statement that "She performs better than Hindenburg, Moskwa and Yoshino..." And this whole discussion resulted in your lack of understanding.

your claim that I play the majority of battle in low Tiers "While your majority of battles in there", which is clearly wrong. I never claimed that Yoshino is bad. That is YOU overinterpreting something you do not understand. "pride goeth before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall" Which is why I did not do it...

You started the argument. Do not blame that on me. When you cannot count, do not talk about majorities. It is ok, that you play in divisions, but do not complain about something that you do more often in divisions than me. And do not complain aboput offtopic, when you are the one starting it When you do not want to read offtopic, then do not make personal offtopic attacks on people! You whole post reeks of Hypocrisy And he does not know me either. Did not stop him either. He should not complain about stuff he does himself.

While I applaud your creativity with numbers, it does not change the fact that you visited low Tiers much more often than me. And I am sure the low Tier players took great comfort in the fact that you played 3.5 times more battles than me, when you visited them with your three man division Btw. I did that exactly zero times! And I am not sure you should talk about other players low Tier battles, when either you math or your definition of Low Tier is lacking. And I agreed with you HOURS ago that more HP for Zao would be no problem, but you are annoyed with me This forum always cracks me up and you wonder why I spend so much time here...

You still have more battles in low Tier than me...

No need to get defensive. And for someone who played more low Tier battles than me, you should be careful with your accusations. And I have no idea why you bring up Austin, but you probably want to tell me that your solo performance on Sojuz is representative of your skill. I personally would not pay that much attention to a lone ship with such a few battles, but that is your choice.

Solo Winrate. Do not look at your division numbers were you get carried by your teammates.

Self-awareness is the first step Certainly. The forum is full of people who complain about CV, who never played them. And Unicums with many thousands of battles are in agreement. I am not hijacking anything. I suggest you look up that word first. And I have no idea why someone like you makes complaints about teamplay and what this has to do with this topic. Still better than yours.

And? Is that some achievement worth speaking about? Yes, you can speak about a performance of a ship. It is not difficult. Interesting opinion, but that makes it even more obvious that you have no clue what you are talking about.

People that understand the difference between subjective and objective arguments do that. But I already told you that. Must be the reason I bought Napoli for coal....

How do compare ships of different Tiers? In absolute values? I can keep my answers short and do not need to ramble.

As I already said, for ship performance you look at server stats... And the one spamming here is you, since you need multiple posts to answer one posting of mine, while I use one pist for multiple postings of yours... I did not say they are the same. Yes, they are close. That is what I meant. Nope. Per Tier Azuma is the better performing ship.

Yes, that includes other people... And I told you that I understand you. And no, Yoshino does not play that differently to Azuma and therefore I will not buy a worse Tier X version of the ship. And no, a single player is never a benchmark for a ships performance.

I doubt that they show that, but I agree that it would be no problem to give Zao her old HP. You play her when you like the playstile. Why else? I understand that you consider your Zao performance to be the benchmark for the ship.

Your stats are not the benchmark for the whole server...

I said she performs worse than Zao. Note the difference. And anyone able to read can say that. And yes, I have the Azuma and know the playstile. Feel free to base you judgement on your subjective feelings. I prefer more objectivity.

Zoom in.

And that is why most cruisers work well vs DD and Dutch guns are sufficient to deal with DD.

Sieht stark danach aus als haettest Du das Schiff nur zum Testen gehabt.

they have Hydro and the guns are good enough against DD Air Defender does not work well in this game since the CV rework Enemies that close to you are not camping anyway they work decently vs other cruisers it is not a cruisers job to counter BB...

I think the server stats decide that better than me.