ColonelPete

Got? The credit income will be lower tomorrow.

Nope.

She has less DPM than Chapa and much less than Cleveland. The heal is nice, but will not compensate for the much lower DPM, unless she is a tank, which I doubt.

Then do not throw mulitpliers like 1.17 or 3 around, when you do not know what they mean.

Musashi had never a higher credit multiplier than Missouri. And when you compare multipliers, you have to state what the base is.

You are ignoring the fact that you claim something without proving it. To compare results, you need result screens, not claims.

Das sind die Modifikatoren, die oben in der Listen aufgelistet sind (Clan, Typ 10, Equal Speed Charlie London).

You will find the same people who did it back then...

That is with modifiers.... And the gamescom camo that gives +50% credits exists since 2016...

As I said, without modifiers.

That does not explain the difference. I bet the earning screen to that screenshot shows modifiers.

What is common for you? Every 20th match? March 2017: 200k damage, no credits multipliers: https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/123570-credit-output-of-the-missouri/ Dez 2017:

It was not. LWL states 50% in her Missouri review that was published, when Missouri was introduced... And 1.6M credits games without modifiers were never common, not even among unicums.

17% is not enough, especially when it does not multiply with signals and camos. Normal Tier IX premiums earn 12.5% more than Tier VIII premiums. Missouri earns 50% more than Tier VIII premiums. That is an advantage of 33% to Tier IX premiums. Edit: LWM assumes that the advantage of Missouri compared to Tier IX premiums is between 20 to 25%.

Because small changes to CV will not change the issue. We just had the rocket aiming change and the opinion about CV did not really change on the forum, but it cost WG around 15% of their regular CV players. The only thing that would help would be a complete rework that made CV, Non-CV players and WG happy. Good luck More like around 0.2% of the EU playerbase.

Sie fühlt sich so frustrierend an, weil sie eine niedrige Feuerrate hat. Sie triff aber ganz gut. Sie profitiert davon das man näher ran geht. Aushalten kann sie es.

The HE is slightly slower, which means you have to slightly predict more. Dispersion is the same.

It is just the way the site does math. Here is the "difference" between a stock and upgraded Bismarck:

All BB rely on dispersion...

I do not see anything in your post that would make it broken. you get more range have an advantage to aim behind islands (when your shells reach there) have an advantage to aim at ships in smoke The accuracy does not change. To the contrary, players, not used to aiming from the different angle, will hit less.

Das hat wohl weniger mit dem Verständnis des Konzeptes zu tun, sondern eher damit ob man die Konzepte notwendig und unterhaltsam findet. Das Konzept der KM DD ist in der Beschreibung benannt. Da ist nichts zu verstehen. Aber wir haben etwa 40% BB in jedem Gefecht, die sehr gut die Kreuzer kontern. Dazu gibt es eine CV Linie, die gegen Kreuzer ausgerichtet ist und die restlichen CV sind auch nicht schwach gegen Kreuzer. Dazu kommen die Superkreutzer und Kreuzer mit starker AP, die es anderen Kreuzern auch noch schwer machen. Denkst Du wirklich das Kreuzer so dominant im Spiel sind, das es einen weiteren Konter brauchte? Hast Du Dir die Kreuzerzahlen mal angeschaut? Das ist Design am Spiel vorbei. Vor allem wenn das Konzept nur für die Hälfte der Linie funktioniert und für die läuft es nur, weil WG tief in die Trickkiste gegriffen und ihnen magische Geschosse verpasst hat. Und damit diese Schiffe nicht zu stark sind, wurde ihnen fast alles genommen, was einen DD ausmacht. Der Rest des Teams freut sich. Dabei gab es im Vorfeld genug Vorschläge beides zu vereinen, ohne das es zu stark wird. Und Schlachtschiffe mit einer niedrigen Feuerrrate und großer Streuung bringen sicher einen großen Spielspaß...

Looks like we do not get De Ruyter.

See patchnotes...

She is a premium, so you have to consider the players. While WG has more detailed data, that could show a worse performance, they tend to act very late, especially with premium ships. So it could be years, even if they decide to do something. Her torps are just gimmick, and do not contribute much. Her guns have a slow reload and for some reasons very badly performing shells, much worse than Mogamis, despite being from the same time period.

I did not ask for a why, but a yes or no answer. Do you understand polar questions?