ColonelPete

You are right. Maybe the difference will be less significant.

I just look at my captain in game...

Lyon works, since she has at least 1.6 Sigma. Marlborough has guns that work worse on Tier IX and than Lyons on Tier VII with a 1.4 Sigma. Probably a great ship for people who cannot hit the broadside of a barn. Just aim at the general area, something will hit.

So how many kids do you know compared to adults playing the game? Not in all countries do you have a right to a bank account. And not everyone feels comfortable using their bank account online.

A ship that looks like a dude? Interesting.

I usually do not have problems with her in DD fights. As with all FR DD, timing matters. You have to pounce the enemy when he does not expect it and has no meaningful support. Rushing a DD that is kiting towards his teammates, will usually end badly for FR DD. FR DD profit a lot from high point captains as you can improve the reload a lot.

Which I said... Not sure what your problem is. The revenue is relevant, that means they do not participate much in these mechanics. And no, nothing is nullified. You should notice the difference between "is zero" and "is near zero". And how does a statement about WoWs apply to WoT? Which confirm the ratio of kids playing the game. You doubted these numbers... I asked "Do you think the children would stop playing WoWs when the game becomes PEGI 18?" Note the difference.

The models are extremly similar. Cannot spot a difference at first glance.

Marlborough, Tier IX is a design nightmare, she is a HE spamming BB and even when AP shells of that size can be useful on that Tier, that Sigma will frustrate good aiming Giuseppe Verdi, Tier IX, instead of improving the Marco Polo, you bring the same ship in a stronger version

Ich kann sie einbauen. Versuch es doch erst mal, bevor Du behauptest das geht nicht...

It would primarily limit the influx of new players overall. When a game gets barely any players, then yes, then there will probably be less children. That their business model does not depend on children in WoWs. The vast majority of revenue comes from adults. 4% is near zero, when you consider the lack of revenue Misdirection is when you discuss WOWs and bring up WoT... WoT is a different game I do not play and never played. It is also not relveant for WoWs. In other words you have no idea, but are of a different opinion than someone who has access to the data. Great! The numbers are for a different situation and you can only guess how that relates to WoWs, so I would not pay too much attention to that.

Was wird da genau unterbunden? Empfehlen würde ich es übrigends auch nicht....

Your logic does not compute. Please rethink your post

Compared to what? To the children watching gambling ads online nearly daily? Children going past sports betting or gambling parlors during their life? Do you think the children would stop playing WoWs when the game becomes PEGI 18? Apart from the fact that you already need to be 18 to use the premium shop of WoWs...

Und das sage ich doch...

What is dishonest there? I is just a fact. He is speaking about WoWs, not WoT. see 2. Then please tell us how many kids you know that are playing the game, compared to adults. 50%? 20%? 10%? 5%? Apart from applying to social media, not WoWs, that would increase the number of kids playing WoWs to around 6% at best...

The opposite of that is a minority... 4% is a very low number and considering that kids have less access to money, that covers their claim that WoWs has a very low relation to children. I see no relevance for mixing up WoWs with total Wargaming numbers. WoT has a younger audience than WoWs for example. I was talking about people I got to know. But feel free to ask around where all these hordes of kids are hiding.

Aber das war keine offzielle Ankündigung, sondern, wie gesagt, ein Plaudern aus dem Nähkästchen. Es ist ja auch entsprechend unscharf formuliert. Und wie ich schon gestern sagte, wurde das Thema im englischen Forenteil schon seit Montag Nacht diskutiert.

Wrong module in slot 3...

Weil das nicht weitergeben und nicht Fernhalten ist. Fernhalten wäre wenn der Link zu der Diskussion oder die Diskussion hier über die Diskussion auf dem NA Forum unterbunden würde. Falls es Dir nicht aufgefallen ist, wird nicht jeder Beitrag eines WoWs Mitarbeiters in diesem Forum sofort in alle Sprachen übersetzt und an alle anderen Spielregionen weitergeben. Das geht auch gar nicht. Sub hat aus dem Nähkästchen geplaudert und keine 12h Stunden später war die Information hier und wir können darüber frei diskutieren.

I have no reason to not believe him. If I would meet kids in game, clans and the forum regularly, I might doubt it.

And still, after years of these collabs, they are the vast minority. Sub Octavian told us the numbers.... And how do you propose to cross check the numbers of a company? I suggest to think about that, before you demand that. But feel to ask around how many minors are playing this game. After 6 years of playing the game, the youngest player I personally encountered was 17. And that was one. The vast majority of players I met in my clan and other clans were MUCH older. This also applies to the forum. I know of players that let their kids play on their account, but I never met these. The whole game and price design makes it obvious that this game is targeted at older adult males with large disposable income. Or do you demand stats on women in this game before you can believe that?

And the vast majority of customers of these things in game are adults in reality...

Zum Verständnis: Du hast EINE Siegesserie und glaubst an manipulierstes MM? Was ist mit den Tausenden anderen Spielern, die keine Siegesserie mit Premium Leihschiffen hatten? Ich würde den Fortschritt im Spiel verlangsamen und die Wartungskosten erhöhen. Damit würde über die Tiers der Skilllevel der Spieler besser sortiert, was zu einem ausgeglichenerem MM führt. Und das Abkürzen mit Geld brächte mehr Umsatz. Außerdem würde ich das Low Tier überarbeiten, damit neue Spieler eher beim Spiel bleiben und nicht abgeschreckt werden. WG hat sich für die Lootboxmethode entschieden und scheinbar bringen auch die Dockyards ordentlich Umsatz, sonst hätten wir davon nicht mehrere im Jahr. Geld verdienen ist Statistik. WG schaut genau darauf wievel Umsatz sie pro Spieler machen. Wenn der Wert einbricht, müssen sie dringend was machen. Siehe ARPU und seine abgewandelten Größen (Kapitel 2.7): In der Schriftenreihe der Bayerischen Landeszentrale für neue Medien (BLM) ist im November 2020 der Band 109 zum Thema "Monetarisierung von Computerspielen" von Prof. Dr. Jochen Koubek erschienen https://www.ludologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDFs/Ludologie_Monetarisierung_von_Computerspielen_Jochen_Koubek_blm_109.pdf Es gibt da Abhandlungen, die im Bezug auf das Finanzielle noch weiter in die Tiefe gehen, aber das findet man eher in Englisch. Ein Patent ist kein Beweis für die Nutzung. Das versuche ich verschiedenen Leuten schon seit JAHREN beizubringen. Das Patent ist nicht gerade neu... Es gibt Patente für Weltraumaufzüge - Wo steht der? Wohnkolonien auf dem Mars - Wer wohnt da? Maschinen, die Energie aus dem Nichts erschaffen - Energieprobleme gelöst? (Ok, hier haben viele Patentbehörden reagiert und ihre Anforderungen erhöht) Kompakte Fusionsreaktoren - Klimawandel ade? https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2021/02/08/what-is-behind-the-us-navys-ufo-fusion-energy-patent/

I explained something. Note the difference. I do not mind the dicussions, otherwise I would not engage in them. The cluelessness of most people trying to engage me with offtopic discussions is quite entertaining.