ColonelPete

Nope. You have the theory that player contribution does not matter. Why play at all?

WG has heatmaps with timestamps for sunken ships. They can see it. No idea if they look at it, understand it or just do not care.

The overall player numbers did not drop compared to 2-3 years ago. But WG changed how Low Tiers work (no missions for Tier IV, early access, Low Tier CV).

That is quite easy to test out. Be afk for the whole match for around 300 battles. When you win as much as before, you are right.

They can be happy with that ship. Nobody is preventing that. And since you seem to ignore battle numbers, there are quite a few of your ships that perform worse, even premiums...

Or Bourgogne for that matter... And when you have trouble with English, you should question if you are seeing the insults you are seeing...

No. See above. And the statement was about ALL premiums, not some.

Subs haben sogar ne eigene Kategorie... Einfach nach den anderen Kategorien sortieren...

Nobody is so incompetent to get to 25% WR in Jean Beart in the long run.

And one time that was the job of the economy, which reduced the ratio of bad players in high Tiers...

And nobody does...

And have you looked at the WR of the players of these ships? And even if they are better, that would be a balancing issue, not a MM issue.

exactly....

And where is the "long run"?

Und wieder einer der nicht versteht wie man Gefechte gewinnt. Selbst WG benutzt Winrate als Skill Parameter....

Getting 25% winrate in a ship is pretty hard. I know of nobody that ever achieved that in the long run...

What have premium ships to do with MM? If you want, you can ask WG to get the old MM back:

When you are bad and get bad results, that is hardly a reason for WG to change something...

While the article and video are quite interesting, it does not change the fact that you mess up quite often and the players can tell you that in advance, without the fancy tools... And no matter how often you claim that gimmicks make ships unique and interesting, reality says something different. Players like ships without special gimmicks and uniqueness comes from a ships history and her historical design.

Es haben sie auch genug Veteranen wieder ausgepackt, um zu sehen wie sich das Crediteinkommen geändert hat.

Just take the coal containers...

They told us in the announcement... 5 weeks of Tokens.

PEF and Mackensen both have the problem with their WW1 shells, that are too weak for that Tier. When the early access is over, we will see how the performance of Mackensen goes down and how much improvement these ships need.

Das ist eine Tabelle über die letzen 2 Monate... Die Schiffe gab es da schon alle...

Forrest Sherman, ok, but not a fan of SAP DD hunters, I fear that this will be another Research Bureau Power Creep ship Sevastopol, would not be surprised if this one breaks the mold again, it that really necessary? There is a reason normal cruisers are that unpopular in game when you have to face 5 BB and 2-3 Supercruisers, who just wait for your broadside... Spanish Tier VI Cruiser Canarias, a bit questionable that you give Spain its own tree and the super salvo mode will just make the difference between good and bad players even bigger. If you make it balanced for average players, good players will wipe the ocean clean with ease, if you make it balanced for good players, average and bad players will just get a bad ship... British Tier VI Cruiser Dido, best announcement of the bunch, HP seem slightly low RU Sub, just no....