ColonelPete

It has impact, as you have to play specific ships. If you decide to play something else, you do not advance in the mission.

Exactly

When one is a bad player, the red team usually wins, when one is a good player, the green team usually wins. So much for the resulf being independent of ones game strength. As you said yourself, the green clans have the advantage. Skill matters. There are people who claim that people who spend money on the game get better match results. Can I refer these players to you?

Why is fear necessary? Sounds more like bad game design when you have to work with fear. Starting a mission gives you nothing. You have to finish them.

How is that bad game design? What has risk to do with that? Without playing these missions, you would not get a thing.

Yes, every time someone loses connection to the game, for whatever reason, that account is perma banned. There is obviously no other answer.

It would be better if you did not lose access to your ships. You could accomplish the same with missions for specific Tiers, Classes or even ships. You could even better control which ships are played more.

Depends on your definition of ready. The game will run. You will just not see every shell every time.

That is called "Russian Bias".

Because they are not OP....

Aliens! That should be obvious!

This playerbase is so silly sometimes.

No, old engine. When there are too many shells, the engine cannot handle it.

The base dispersion, yes, but overall I am not so sure with the much worse Sigma. 1.9 and 1.4 is a huge difference.

Interesting change, considering that the remaining shell parameters are the same. But I doubt a difference of less than 5% in damage makes a shell trash.

The AP is the same...

No. The modules are not needed. Some are even a complete waste of time like the Kleber legendary module.

But they do not. What I am doing wrong?

Yes, when you expect quick results. No, when you want to help the community. It needs a lot of reports of multiple people to get rid of these players. I know of two cases where such players got permanently (as far as one can see) banned. But it took months and who knows how many reports of different players. WG is a bit slow on the uptake. When someone plays a few dozens of such battles, WG should make it clear to these players that when they continue like this, they will lose their accounts. And after ten more of these battles they should pull the plug. In reality, these players can bot for hundreds or even many thousands of battles before WG does something. When you calculate how many players are affected during this time, then it should be obvious to WG that this is not a small matter.

She has the same AP performance as GC and Andrea Doria, which is similar to Normandie, which is noticable weaker than 356mm guns. Her biggest problem is the 1.4 Sigma, despite the fact that she has a slightly improved base dispersion.

Some people do that. But since WG lowered the requirements for Random, it is easy to do there to.

The last two months: http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20211204/eu_2month/average_ship_u.html

Wann ist früher?

Und Schaden an BB ist weniger wert.

One needs to know: the ship you played the visual of the icon on the ship in port, before you played it your collection of ingame currencies, before and after your game